By Bill Donohue, Catholic
League president
A new poll on LGBT rights has been
published by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), a left-wing outfit
with a reputation for crafting politically skewed surveys. Its most
prominent researcher, sociologist Robert P. Jones, is well known for demonizing
so-called Christian nationalists.
PRRI recently released its 2023 American
Values Atlas report, “Views On LGBTQ Rights In All 50 States.” It offers more
proof that the aforementioned flaws are extant. As a sociologist and a Catholic
leader, I have great interest in this subject.
First a word about LGBT people
(there is no need to add a “Q”—it stands for Queers and is therefore a
redundancy).
The typical LGBT person is a young
Democrat with no religious affiliation. This makes perfect sense.
Transgenderism, the ideology that
falsely holds that the sexes are interchangeable, is a culturally induced
phenomenon that is more attractive to young people than older Americans.
Democrats are mostly liberals, and as such they have an expansive view of
sexuality. Secular-minded persons reject nature, and nature’s God, and are therefore
easy bait for transgender influencers.
To put it differently, the older a
person is, the less likely he is to buy into this mad idea. Republicans tend to
be conservatives and are therefore more immune to trendy fashions unhinged from
reality. Religious Americans appreciate nature, and nature’s God, and are thus
inhospitable to militant secular ideas.
There are two aspects of the
survey that deserve a riposte.
One of the questions asked
respondents was whether they supported or opposed “allowing a small business
owner in your state to refuse to provide products or services to gay or lesbian
people if doing so would violate their religious beliefs.”
This is a dishonest question. In
fact, it is a red herring designed to make religious persons look intolerable.
It is dishonest because PRRI knows
that this issue, which was broached in two similar Colorado cases that wound up
in the Supreme Court, had nothing do to with denying homosexuals products or
services because of their sexual orientation. It had to do with the religious
rights of Christians being violated for having to affirm conduct they could not in good conscience do.
Neither Jack Phillips nor Lorie
Smith ever denied serving a customer who was gay or lesbian. Phillips sold them
cakes and Smith serviced their websites. But when Phillips was asked to
personally inscribe a wedding cake for two men, he refused. Smith issued a
preemptive strike by publicly stating that she would not provide web services
celebrating gay weddings. The high court agreed with them, noting the obvious
religious liberty issues involved.
PRRI, following Jones’ obsession
with Christian nationalism, claims that those who believe that America was
founded as a Christian nation and should return to its moorings are a threat to
democracy.
If someone were to say that
America was founded as a secular nation and should become even more secular,
would it be fair to say that this person is a threat to democracy? Of course
not. One may disagree, but to assert that we are on the verge of a despotic
secular regime would be as irresponsible as saying that Christian nationalists
are about to establish a theocracy.
PRRI is not simply reporting
survey results—it is setting the political table for liberals.
For example, Politico, a mostly
responsible liberal media outlet, seems to go off the rails when it comes to
Christian nationalism. Last month it maintained that if Trump wins in November,
his allies are ready to infuse Christian nationalism in his second
administration. It claimed to have the evidence to buttress its position, yet
it conceded that “The documents obtained by Politico do not outline specific Christian
nationalist policies.” That’s because there are none.
Heidi Przybyla wrote a piece for
Politico last month that set off the alarms. The issue was the conviction,
shared by millions of Americans, and encoded in the Declaration of
Independence, that our rights come from God, not from government (that was what
Stalin, Hitler and Mao believed). This simple observation was enough to send
her into orbit. Now it would have come as a shocker to Jefferson, who was not
exactly a religious guy, that he was a Christian nationalist.
PRRI knows what it is doing. None of what they did was a mistake. Which is why they are not to be trusted.
No comments:
Post a Comment