Tuesday, November 29, 2022

Parents Give Disney A Wake-Up Call

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue 

The most common word used by reviewers of Disney’s new film, “Strange World,” was “bombs.” Disney expected to bring in $30 to $40 million over Thanksgiving weekend, but instead netted only $18.6 million. That’s pretty bad considering it cost $180 million to make the flick. 

It is expected to cost Disney $100 million when the final numbers are posted. The Wrap called it “one of Disney’s biggest failures ever,” saying it was the “biggest animated bomb in 20 years.” 

What happened? Those who live inside the Hollywood bubble can’t figure it out. But parents can. 

“Strange World” was the first animated movie for children featuring a gay teen romance. That’s not what most parents want their kids to see: they don’t want to sexualize their children. 

Disney was founded as a family-friendly organization. In more recent years it became a gay-friendly outfit, and now it has gone beyond that by showing no tolerance for parents who do not ascribe to the politics of  sexual engineers. 

Very few of the reviewers who slammed the movie mentioned that it was subject to parental backlash. Instead, some critics floated a conspiracy theory maintaining that Disney wanted the movie to bomb. 

“Here’s the theory,” says TMZ. “Disney could use the poor performance as rationale to not include LGBTQ characters going forward....” It even floated that idea that the LGBT character was “scapegoated,” as a foil for not going down this road again. 

This is nonsense. Disney made this movie for two reasons: it wanted to make money and it wanted to advance the cause of gay activists.  

 Have these critics not remembered that earlier this year Disney sought to impose its morally debased ideas on children in kindergarten through the third grade? It intentionally sought to do battle with Florida Gov. DeSantis for promoting a bill designed to protect parental rights, one which prohibited teachers from questioning children on whether they were satisfied being a boy or a girl. 

Parents have not forgotten, nor are they forgiving. 

No movie tabloid was more out of touch than the Hollywood Reporter. Pamela McClintock said “Strange World” bombed because of poor marketing. She opined that it was “pummeled by poor word-of-mouth.” 

She is twice wrong. In fact, “word-of-mouth” succeeded brilliantly: parents passed the word about Disney trying to impose its radical gay agenda on children, and it was that kind of social marketing that did the flick in. 

Then there is Lovia Gyarkye of the Hollywood Reporter. She hailed the gay character, saying it was “a historic moment for the conservative studio.” Only someone living in a left-wing ghetto would call today’s Disney a “conservative” studio. She outdid herself again when she said the movie has “the makings of a new classic.” More cluelessness. 

“Strange World” bombed for the same reason “Lightyear” did earlier this year. Parents don’t want to allow Hollywood to seduce their children. It’s time Disney adjusted its sails and got with the times. As some critics have noted, “woke = broke.” Broken financially, as well as morally.

The Heritage View: These GOP Senators Won’t Say Whether They Support Vital Religious Freedom Amendments

Following the Thanksgiving holiday, the Senate will hold a procedural vote Monday on an amendment, introduced by Republican Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Democratic Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin and others, that alleges to protect religious freedom. Conservative leaders have said that the amendment is not adequate and pushed for Lee’s amendment to be adopted. The Daily Signal repeatedly asked Sens. Collins, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Shelley Capito of West Virginia, Rob Portman of Ohio, Mitt Romney of Utah, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Todd Young of Indiana whether they will still support the bill without amendments protecting religious freedom. Heritage Experts: Jay Richards and Roger Severino

Bits And Pieces

By Deacon Mike Manno 

(The Wanderer) – Well, we’re on to Christmas having now survived the Midterm Elections and Thanksgiving, which sometimes turns out to be family bickering day if, in fact, siblings have now ended up on opposite political poles. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to solve the problem you may have with your pesky relatives who refuse to believe your logically particular ideology. I, at least, am satisfied that this column was able to duck political and legal issues for two weeks while we celebrated All Saints and Thanksgiving.

But I can’t stay quiet about such things for too long, which is probably why my wife and I had to eat Thanksgiving dinner by ourselves. There’s not a whole lot I can dwell on at length this week, but I do have a few nuggets that I’ll pass on for whatever they are worth.

First some good, but not unexpected, news: Another federal judge, earlier this year, has ruled that “In God We Trust” is, in fact, constitutional.

The case in which our national motto was involved arose from a public charter school which had displayed a plaque or poster containing the motto in the school entrance. One Dustin Faeber, an attorney, filed the suit on behalf of his minor daughter. Evidently, the parents took umbrage over the plaque’s message that they saw while they were dropping their child off for her first day in kindergarten because they wished to raise their daughter in a non-religious manner.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs asked, on behalf of their kindergartener — who presumably could not even read the poster — for an order for the state to remove its display.

Judge Aleta A. Trauger rejected the challenge to the motto, citing a long line of cases which had supported it, and dismissed the parents’ argument noting: “The entire display in which the poster of the national motto is situated itself contains no religious symbolism or references and, as such, reflects no intention on the part of the School Defendants to establish or promote a religion. . . . It is not coercive; and it does not involve any excessive entanglement of a government institution and religion.”

One for the good guys.

In another case about public expression of faith, a school upheld a teacher’s right to paint her parking stall with a Bible verse.

In Wesley Chapel, Fla., the Wiregrass Ranch High School allows teachers to paint and decorate their parking spaces. Of course, that’s probably not as popular as Twitter employees getting free lunches and wine coolers on tap, but it was something nice.

Anyway, a teacher painted on her spot the words, “I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me.” Hardly fighting words, but it did cause a ruckus. Apparently, an instructional assistant, Marina Gentilesco, did find offense in it. “I feel like it’s attacking me as a Jew,” she claimed.

She was quoted in the local press as saying, “It brings me to the verge of tears, because it brings me back to the six million that perished. Six million perished because of our faith — because we’re Jews.”

Apparently, those painful moments were just too much for Ms. Gentilesco, who opined that the Bible verse would not be offensive if found on a church building, but doesn’t think it belongs on school grounds.

The school officials looked at the issue a little differently, however. School spokesman Stephen Hegarty said the Bible verse was not a violation but a personal expression.

“There is no proselytizing going on,” he said. “It’s not compelling students to do anything one way or the other….It has nothing to do with instruction,” he said. “It’s just a teacher expressing themselves just like they might wear a crucifix on their shirt. Teachers and students are free to express themselves.”

Another one for the good guys. And some good legal news:

In Amarillo, Texas, a federal district court rejected the government’s interpretation of the word “sex” in federal law to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”

The case, Neese v. Becerra, involved two physicians who challenged the Biden administration’s mandate in the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) that required them to perform medical procedures that violated the physicians’ religious or conscience rights. It also challenged the administration’s requirement that men (trans-women) be allowed to compete on women and girls athletic teams.

The court wrote in reference to female athletics: “Title IX’s protections center on differences between the two biological sexes — not SOGI [sexual orientation and gender identity] status,” the court wrote in its opinion. “Title IX expressly allows sex distinctions and sometimes even requires them to promote equal opportunity. . . . Defendants’ theory actively undermine[s] one of [Title IX’s] major achievements, giving young women an equal opportunity to participate in sports.”

The court ruled that the administration’s interpretation, or reinterpretation, of the word “sex” was overbroad and must be struck down.

But even with harbingers of good things to come I can’t overlook the fact that no sooner did we get rid of all those annoying political ads (except for Georgia — sorry about that), than we now have to listen to all those mind-numbing ads for Medicare annual enrollments. I don’t know which is worse. On second thought I do. It is the ads for Camp Lejeune victims that I now get every day in my email.

Finally, I know we’ll have a lot to say about the election — that is if we ever get all the ballots counted, but I do not understand how with all of our technology it takes us to Thanksgiving to count votes cast in early November. I have a solution. Get rid of all the electoral gimmicks in the law to streamline the process: ballot harvesting, jungle primaries, ranked-choice voting, and month-long mail-in voting.

Absentee and mail-in voting should be limited to just a few weeks and require signature matches. For in-person voting all should be required to provide a photo identification. I simply do not believe the Democrats who claim that minorities are under a hardship to provide the ID.

My one comment on the results: despite the overly optimistic advance claims by national partisans, I thought the election went well here in Iowa. We re-elected our pro-life governor, Kim Reynolds, by a landslide and turned out our longtime attorney general in favor of a pro-life Republican, Brenna Bird, who will, hopefully, be a counterweight to the newly elected George Soros funded Democrat county attorney.

I think I should just try putting my head in the sand for another few weeks.

(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every Thursday on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)

Tuesday, November 22, 2022

Heritage Foundation: It’s time for pro-life policy-makers to go on offense

The GOP finally managed to take control of the House of Representatives. So, what should pro-life lawmakers do to advance their cause in the next Congress? They don’t have to reach for the full pro-life enchilada, where every person is protected and welcomed in both life and law, on day one. Even the next-best goal, legislation to protect unborn human beings after a heartbeat is detected, would be a massive uphill battle. After all, Joe Biden is still in the White House, and the Senate presents its own challenges. But pro-lifers in the House need to do everything they can to advance the ball and, importantly, expose the soft pro-abortion underbelly — which now tolerates even infanticide. Heritage Expert: Jay Richards and Emma Waters

Disney’s Iger Is The Problem, Not The Answer

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue 

Bob Chapek, who was fired as the Disney CEO, certainly made enemies in and out of Disney. But he is not entirely to blame. Much of that goes to his predecessor, and now successor, Bob Iger. 

Few outside of Disney even heard of Chapek until he made a big splash sticking his nose into politics earlier this year. In March, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the “Parental Rights in Education” bill, a measure that prohibits attempts to sexualize little boys and girls in grades kindergarten through third grade. 

Chapek’s initial stance was to stay out of the controversy. But Iger, who had retired, couldn’t resist undercutting the man he handpicked to succeed him. 

On February 24, while the bill was being debated—in Florida and around the country—Iger tweeted his opposition to it, siding with President Biden. Our “devout Catholic” president called the attempt to protect children from being sexualized “hateful.” Iger added that the bill “will put vulnerable, young LGBTQ people in jeopardy.” 

Less than two weeks later, Chapek folded. On March 7, he pledged his opposition to parental rights. “I want to make it crystal clear: I and the entire leadership team unequivocally stand in support of our LGBTQ+ employees, their families, and their communities.” On March 11, he dug himself in deeper when he apologized to the radicals who pressured him. 

It would be a mistake to think that Iger opposes parental rights for business reasons. No, he does so for moral reasons. 

On March 31, CNN aired an interview that Iger had taped with Chris Wallace a few weeks earlier. 

“A lot of these issues are not necessarily political. It’s about right and wrong.” Similarly, he said, “When you’re dealing with right and wrong or when you’re dealing with something that does have profound impact on your business, I just think you have to do what is right and not worry about the potential backlash to it.” 

Iger’s statement could not be more clear. The man who now leads Disney thinks it is morally right for teachers to question kids about whether they are content being a boy or a girl—that is exactly the kind of grooming exercise that DeSantis, and millions of Americans, oppose. 

Look for things to deteriorate further, on the moral front, at least. 

Chapek’s biggest weakness was in working with the creative team at Disney. One of Iger’s first comments as CEO was to assure that this will be corrected. “It is my intention to restructure things in a way that honors and respects creativity as the heart and soul of who we are.” 

By “creativity,” the woke masters at Disney mean such things as women kissing each other in children’s films. That’s why the LGBT crowd pressured executives to include a gay kiss in the movie “Lightyear.” They got what they wanted. 

Well, not exactly. Disney did not show the gals kissing in the Middle Eastern and Asian version, electing not to offend Muslim despots and the Communist slavemasters in China. As for religious folks in America who would like to be spared such fare, that’s just too bad—they need to be reeducated. 

It’s not just Iger who wants to morally pollute America—it’s Disney’s president Karen Burke. She likes to brag that she has “one transgender child and one pansexual child.” More important, she boasts Disney has “many, many, many LGBTQIA characters.” 

Disney won’t stop until parents rebel. While there are some very encouraging signs that parents have had it, there needs to be more resistance to those who want to eroticize children. We need to teach Iger what “right and wrong” should really mean.

Religion Clause: Football Coach Sues After Being Fired for Religiou...

Religion Clause: Football Coach Sues After Being Fired for Religiou...: Suit was filed last week by the former head football coach for Washington State University who was fired after refusing on religious grounds...

Monday, November 21, 2022

The Catholic Roots Of Thanksgiving


By Deacon Mike Manno 

(The Wanderer) -- As Thanksgiving approached I began thinking about what to write for a good Thanksgiving column, especially after last week’s column about my father, baseball, and youthful times in Philadelphia.

As I wracked my brain for an idea, I remembered a friendship I developed as an aspiring novelist with another writer looking for her first publisher as well. She and I met in an online writers’ group and while we never actually met person to person, we did develop a friendship which lasted several years.

She was a teacher and interested in children’s books and told me about the book on which she was working about the first Thanksgiving in what became the United States — it was not in Jamestown in 1619 as we all believed, but in 1565 in St. Augustine, Fla. So I did a little digging.

As I followed the corresponding links to her book, I found the story was much more involved than the place and the date: There was a real connection with the Catholic Church and the Eucharist which I had been unaware. For the first Thanksgiving was held in conjunction with a Thanksgiving Mass, Holy Communion, and a banquet to which the Spanish settlers in St. Augustine invited the local Tumucuan Indians to partake, which they did.

The Catholic connection to the Thanksgiving began when the priest, who was the chaplain to the Spanish Fleet, Fr. Francisco Lopez de Mendoza Grajales, who also became the first parish priest in St. Augustine, planted a cross in the sand and celebrated the first parish Mass, September 8, the feast of the Nativity of Our Lady who ultimately became the patroness of the Americas. Fr. Lopez then celebrated a Mass of Thanksgiving.

The Spanish expedition leader, Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, with some 800 Spanish settlers, joined the celebration with their invited guests.

What we inherited from the later Jamestown Thanksgiving was a New England dinner, including turkey — which was not on the menu in 1619. Since it was their first harvest in Jamestown they probably ate vegetables, including cabbage, beans, carrots, corn, fruits including blueberries, plums, grapes, and cranberries, as well as fish, shellfish, mussels in curd. Lobster, bass, clams, and oysters were probably on the menu, too.

The Spaniards, by contrast, probably feasted on cocido — a stew made with salted pork and garbanzo beans, hard sea biscuits, and red wine. If the Indians brought their own food, the feast would have included turkey, venison, gopher tortoise, and seafood such as catfish, drum, and mullet. Also included might have been squash, beans, and maize (corn).

Now I must admit, today’s turkey with all the fixings, pumpkin pie, and football sound like a better mix . . . but I digress.

The meal was shared by all but no one really knows what the natives thought of the Mass. However, Fr. Lopez, in his journal, said they imitated all that they had seen. Interesting how we should imitate Thanksgiving in our lives, Mass and Eucharist, followed by a celebratory meal. Remember, the word Eucharist comes from the Greek Eucharistia, which means “thanksgiving.” Thus, the Body of Christ is the true Thanksgiving meal, which we should understand and imitate at every Mass we attend.

Obviously there were other celebrations of thanks for safe arrivals by many Catholic explorers, notably from Spain and France during that time period, including Juan Ponce de León in 1513. The difference between these celebrations was that they were not at a permanent settlement, as was St. Augustine. St. Augustine was important notably because it was the first community act of Thanksgiving in the first permanent European settlement in the land, according to Michael Gannon, in his book, The Cross in the Sand.

There is one other connection with the Catholic Church and Thanksgiving lore: This one is from the Jamestown settlement in 1619. The Native American who mediated between the English Pilgrims and the Indians to establish what is thought of as the original Thanksgiving, Squanto, brings a new religious connotation to the event.

Squanto had been enslaved by the British but was freed by the Spanish Franciscans, who converted him to Catholicism. Thus, it was a Catholic convert who, in effect, was responsible for the Jamestown Thanksgiving celebration we think of every year at this time.

But why don’t we think of the Spanish Thanksgiving and Mass in 1565? Did we lose it in history? Well, in a word, yes.

During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the French, Spanish, and British vied against each other, seeking to expand their influence in the New World against the other nations. Unfortunately for the French and the Spanish, the British won the expansion battle and ultimately British history and traditions eclipsed the others, especially when the British began an annual reenactment of the “first” Thanksgiving in 1621. That reenactment survived to provide the historical genesis for the Thanksgiving tradition ultimately adopted by the soon-to-be independent United States, which inherited the traditions of the Mother Country.

Well, we’ve come a long way from the time of the first Spanish settlers and the Pilgrims. Thanksgiving customs and foods have changed, but the central idea has not: setting aside a day for giving thanks for what you have; a day to appreciate your family and friends, who, after all, provide for you the greatest joys in your life. And, of course, we should remember the Eucharistic roots of the day, especially as you decide whether or not to attend morning Mass that day.

So enjoy all the turkey and gravy and football. Have a peaceful and joy-filled day!

By the way, my writer friend and I both received book contracts. Her first was the children’s book America’s REAL First Thanksgiving, by Robyn Gioia. It’s still available on Amazon, paper bound and Kindle editions.

(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every Thursday on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)

Friday, November 18, 2022

South Carolina fights back against ACLU attempt to shutter faith-based foster agencies

WASHINGTON – South Carolina’s 3,500+ foster kids need loving homes. Governor Henry McMaster has asked a federal district court to protect the state’s right to partner with private faith-based foster care ministries that provide loving homes for children in need. In Rogers v. Health and Human Services, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is suing the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Governor Henry McMaster to penalize South Carolina for working with religious foster agencies that serve children in need. 

“Over 3,500 of South Carolina’s children are currently in foster care and we need all the help we can get to see that they are placed in loving homes,” said Gov. Henry McMaster. “This lawsuit is a shortsighted attack against every South Carolinian’s constitutionally-protected religious liberty. We will continue to fight against any attempt to stop our private partners from being able to help provide these critical services simply because they choose to do so in accordance with their faith.” 

South Carolina’s Department of Social Services works directly with families seeking to foster and adopt children in crisis situations, serving children and families without regard to religion, race, disability, sex, or sexual orientation. The state also partners with an array of diverse private agencies that help recruit and retain more parents for foster children who need a safe place to live. Gov. McMaster issued an executive order protecting the religious freedom of foster agencies in South Carolina. 

Out of dozens of private agencies serving South Carolina, one agency, Miracle Hill Ministries, chooses to partner with families who share its Christian faith. Miracle Hill has an 80-year tradition of recruiting and serving families. Upon learning about Miracle Hill’s foster parent requirements, the ACLU used social media to recruit individuals who did not share Miracle Hill’s faith to apply to foster with the agency. Rather than reach out to any other agency or the state of South Carolina, which supports and licenses foster families directly, the ACLU sued South Carolina and the federal government, alleging that allowing Miracle Hill to serve foster families violated the law. 

“South Carolina’s efforts to protect all avenues of foster care should be applauded, not forced into a courtroom,” said Miles Coleman, partner at Nelson Mullins. “Too many places around the country have shuttered religious foster care agencies, making it harder to find children a home. South Carolina is doing all it can to prevent that.” 

Thankfully, the law does not allow the government to exclude foster agencies because of their religious beliefs. The Supreme Court recently affirmed this in Fulton v. Philadelphia, ruling unanimously that the law protected Catholic Social Services’ right to stick to its religious beliefs and continue serving foster children in Philadelphia. Just as in Fulton, South Carolina licenses many private agencies. This provides families looking to open their homes to children in need with numerous opportunities to find an agency that will be agood fit, while also protecting the religious freedom of all South Carolinians. 

“Faith-based agencies are effective at placing children in loving homes, and the Supreme Court unanimously protected their rights,” said Lori Windham, vice president and senior counsel at Becket. “This attempt to shutter faith-based agencies means fewer choices for foster parents and fewer homes for kids. South Carolina decided it could do better, and it shouldn’t be hauled into court for doing the right thing.”

US bishops’ new pro-life chair supported banning Pelosi from Communion


The election of Bishop Michael Burbidge as chair of their pro-life committee was one of several leadership decisions the U.S. bishops made during their assembly.

(LifeSiteNews) — The new chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ pro-life committee supported the Communion ban on Nancy Pelosi for her radical pro-abortion stance. 

On Wednesday, during their annual fall meeting in Baltimore, the U.S. bishops elected Bishop Michael Burbidge instead of Bishop W. Shawn McKnight as chair of their pro-life committee by a vote of 174 to 63. 

The election of Burbidge as pro-life chair was one of several leadership decisions the U.S. bishops made during their assembly. Archbishop Timothy Broglio was elected to serve a three-year term as the new president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), and Archbishop William Lori was elected its vice president. Burbidge will succeed Lori who held the position as pro-life committee chair before him. 

When San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone barred pro-abortion politician Nancy Pelosi from receiving communion in May, Burbidge upheld the ban in his diocese of Arlington. He said that Cordileone’s directive is “not limited to just a geographical area,” and that he would “respect the decision of Archbishop Cordileone and be consistent with that decision

Bottom of Form

Burbidge praised the San Francisco archbishop for barring Pelosi from Holy Communion until she repents, calling Cordileone “a courageous man” who “loves the Lord” and the Catholic Church. 

Burbidge also revealed that he has privately instructed individuals “who have continuously scandalized the Church by holding a personal Catholic identity while also publicly advocating for abortion or other inherent moral evils” not to come up for Holy Communion in his diocese. 

Moreover, the Arlington prelate publicly condemned President Joe Biden’s plan to codify a national “right to abortion” if Democrats were to win control of Congress. “I condemn abortion and any political tactic that would codify abortion as national policy,” Burbidge said. 

“Fundamentally, abortion ends the life of a precious child and deeply wounds the child’s mother,” Burbidge continued. “The role of Congress is to pass laws that serve the common good — and yet this priority of the president only brings about pain and death.” 

Burbage has also acted to protect both children and adults from the junk science touted by transgender activists and their allies.  

In August 2021, he published a catechetical letter on gender ideology, warning of the “great danger of a misguided charity and false compassion” and told the faithful who interact with a gender-confused individual to avoid using names and pronouns that “contradict the person’s God-given identity” and “reinforce the person’s rejection of the truth.” 

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

In this letter, he also condemned so-called “gender affirming therapy” for children as a “harmful and life-altering path.” 

“We must love in the truth, and truth must be accurately conveyed by our words. At the same time, clarity must always be at the service of charity, as part of a broader desire to move people towards the fulness of the truth,” Burbidge’s letter read. 

But whereas Burbidge has been a champion of doctrinal truth, he has cracked down on the celebration of the form of Mass attended by those U.S. Catholics most likely to believe it. The bishop of Arlington implemented severe restrictions on the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), eliminating 13 of 21 Latin Mass locations in the diocese, following Pope Francis’ controversial motu proprio Traditionis Custodes.  

In response to the TLM restrictions, 300 Catholics held a pilgrimage march from Arlington to Washington, D.C. to show support for the TLM and express their sorrow over the “cruel and unjust” restriction.

Faith Leaders Warn So-Called Respect for Marriage Act Will Hack Away at Religious Freedom

Roger Severino, vice president of domestic policy at The Heritage Foundation, condemned the legislation in a Tuesday statement that accused Democrats of “threatening to empower woke activists inside and outside of government to attack people of faith with this bill that will be used as a cudgel against those who believe in the reality of marriage as between a man and a woman.” “This bill provides no benefit or protection that same-sex couples don’t already have,” he warned. “All this bill does is target people of faith who don’t support woke ideology.” Heritage Experts: Roger Severino, Jay Richards, and Emma Waters 

Thursday, November 17, 2022

Empowering Parents with School Choice Reduces Wokeism in Education

Conservative school choice skeptics are right to raise alarm over the prospective regulatory capture of expanded school choice programs. However, they are mistaken in fearing that giving parents the ability to choose their children’s schools will not reduce wokeism. If regulations can be held in check, as many states have managed to do with their charter sectors, schools tend to be less woke. Conservatives would do well to be vigilant against regulatory capture rather than resigning themselves to defeat. Parental empowerment represents a viable path to fighting back against woke indoctrination in K–12 schools. Controlling wokeism can be achieved by ensuring that schools are more accountable to parents than to regulators. Heritage Expert: Jay Greene 


Our interview with the new attorney general

 

This week on Faith On Trial (https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/) we were able to welcome Iowa’s new attorney general elect Brenna Bird for a discussion of upcoming issues of interest to people of faith. Deacon Mike and Gina discussed with the new AG issues such as religious liberty, parental rights, conscious protection, and dealing with George Soros supported local prosecutors, as we will be facing in Polk County. Listen to this week’s program, or any others, by clicking the link above.

Faith On Trial airs every Thursday morning at 9:30 CT on the So Iowa Catholic Radio Network.


Beware Of Anti-Christmas Acts On Campus

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue

We have previously documented many violent anti-Catholic incidents that have taken place in the wake of the overturning of Roe v. Wade. We have also documented our appeals to the U.S. Attorney General and the FBI to conduct a probe of these crimes. With the Christmas season upon us, we need to do more.

Much of the hostility against Catholics, and Christians in general, is fueled on college campuses. They are the intellectual seedbed of hate speech. It is with this in mind that we are alerting Catholics on campus to beware of acts of bigotry this Christmas season.

To that end, we are emailing over 350 Catholics who are associated with the Cardinal Newman chapters on their campus. These ministries are being asked to contact us in the event they learn of anti-Catholic rhetoric or behavior. We will take it from there.

Cardinal Newman societies are nicely positioned to help us. They are the eyes and ears of practicing Catholics on secular campuses nationwide.

Whether the issue is an anti-Catholic play, or the censoring of Christmas events, we need to know of it at the Catholic League so we can respond with vigor. It is a sad commentary on our society that this needs to be done, but it would be even sadder if our side did nothing about it.

Trust us. We will not be passive. 

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

This week on FOT: Iowa’s new attorney general

 

Iowa's Newly Elected Attorney General 


Attorney General - Elect Brenna Bird

This Thursday Iowa’s newly elected attorney general, Brenna Bird, will join Deacon Mike and Gina to discuss several legal issues that could occupy her time in office:

Ø Religious liberty

Ø Protection of parental rights

Ø Protection of conscious rights especially for health care workers

Ø Dealing with “woke,” or “rogue” prosecutors such as those supported by George Soros

So join us this Thursday morning at 9:30 on the Iowa Catholic Radio Network or follow our links to the podcast of the program.

Religion Clause: Court Says Title IX and ACA Do Not Bar Transgender...

In Neese v. Beccera(ND TX, Nov. 11, 2022), a Texas federal district court granted declaratory relief concluding that neither Title IX nor Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act that incorporates Title IX's ban on sex discrimination prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.  At issue is a Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care issued by the Department of Health and Human Services in March 2022 which is challenged by two physicians who make sex-specific medical decisions relevant to gender identity. The court reasoned that the Supreme Court's Bostock decision that interprets Title VII's prohibition of discrimination "because of" sex does not automatically carry over to Title IX that prohibits discrimination "on the basis of" sex. The court began its opinion as follows:

In his Bostock dissent, Justice Alito foresaw how litigants would stretch the majority opinion like an elastic blanket to cover categories, cases, and controversies expressly not decided. Justice Alito warned: "The entire Federal Judiciary will be mired for years in disputes about the reach of the Court's reasoning."...

And here we are....

The court reasoned in part:

Title IX presumes sexual dimorphism in section after section, requiring equal treatment for each "sex."...

Defendants' reinterpretation of Title IX through the Notification imperils the very opportunities for women Title IX was designed to promote and protect -- categorically forcing biological women to compete against biological men.

ADF issued a press release announcing the decision.

Monday, November 14, 2022

Dad, Baseball, And The Phillies

By Deacon Mike Manno

(The Wanderer) – As I write this, we are all awaiting the returns from the mid-term elections. When they come in, I’m sure there will be a lot of time to ponder what it all means, and I’m equally sure there will be pundits aplenty to explain it all to us.

But for now, I’d like to go back to last week when we celebrated the feasts of All Saints and All Souls, and — at least for me — watched the Philadelphia Phillies in the World Series.

Now you might wonder why a guy who grew up in Des Moines, Iowa, would be so excited about an East Coast team from Philadelphia. It’s very simple, both my parents were from there. My dad was from South Philly — think Dick Clark and Bandstand — and my mother was from Roxborough-Manayunk, next to the Schuylkill River. My dad was a printer who had his own print shop in Philadelphia before he was forced to sell to the city.

He then took a job in Richmond, Va., where they lived for about a year and it was during that time I was born. He was finally offered a job in Des Moines as a superintendent of an envelope manufacturing firm and moved my mom and the 15-week-old me to Iowa.

Every year we would take our vacation in Philly and Atlantic City where we would visit relatives, see the city, and bask in the sun. My dad took me all over, Independence Hall, all the historic sites, and even Admiral Dewey’s flagship from the Battle of Manila Bay, the Olympia (“You may fire when ready, Gridley”), which was in the Philadelphia Naval Yard. In the gift shop Dad bought me a model of the Olympia which I took back to Iowa, built, and displayed in my bedroom for as long as I can remember.
We rode the subway, trolley, and any other conveyance there that wasn’t in Des Moines, as we did in Atlantic City and especially on the Boardwalk (“Watcha wheel, Watcha wheel”).

But the one thing he always talked about was Connie Mack and the Philadelphia Athletics. The A’s were the city’s American League team until it moved to Kansas City in 1954. The city’s National League team was, of course, the Phillies. Even though he knew more Connie Mack stories, he was also a fan of the Phillies and would often take me to their games when we were there. He was a big baseball fan and every morning before work he would cut the standings from the paper to post at work.

I remember how we both suffered through the end of the 1964 season when Phillies’ Manager Gene Mauch blew a five and a half game lead in the last two weeks by changing the rotation of his pitching staff, according to Dad.

Anyway, he taught me a lot about baseball and life, and we lost him just as I was completing college — a day he was looking forward to since no one in the family had ever attended college before.

So, this year the Phillies, in improbable fashion, made it to the playoffs and finally into the World Series.
But there was something that made this year different from the rest. First, I was home and got to watch all the play-off games from there; last year I saw the World Series from a hospital bed and not a very comfortable one at that. I had just suffered a stroke, apparently a mild one, and could not talk or make sense with my conversation for several days. Naturally it was during that “babbling phase” when my bishop came to visit me.

But the difference from hospital bed to easy chair at home also reminded me how lucky I was in such a rapid recovery, I’m here, alive, and well. My only lasting effect is that while I can see, for some reason, I cannot read. That curbs my activities somewhat. Obviously, I cannot practice law if I cannot read, but I still can serve at the altar if the priest and lector can read my parts.

I even do my weekly hospital runs, although my peripheral vision limits my driving, but I have a kind and loving wife who will take me to the hospitals and nursing homes so I can take Communion to parishioners. She also helps me edit my columns and reads to me the material I need for my radio program. I still can compose — I was a journalism major in college and was taught to think behind a keyboard. Thus, I’m like the blind pianist who can play the melody but just can’t read the music.
It also made me more thankful the stroke wasn’t worse than it was and for all the folks who prayed for my recovery.

The second reason this World Series was different was because it coincided with the observations of All Saints and All Souls. My parish had several Masses to commemorate those days which included two Latin Masses. I was privileged to be present on the altar for two All Souls Masses, one Novus Ordo, and the other a Traditional Latin Requiem Mass for the dead, as well as a Traditional Latin Mass for All Saints.

Now the Mass times did conflict with the World Series a bit, but I was usually able to get home to pick up the night’s game from an early inning. But the Feasts of All Saints and All Souls, mixed with the World Series, led me to reconnect with my deceased father, my past, and how God had kept me safe and close, and how He had provided me with such a wonderful family (my mother is deceased as well) and the best of possible circumstances for a young boy to grow into manhood.

It made me thankful for all I have received in this life but sad that I could have done much more with it. In other words, it gave me a new perspective on life, how to live, and how to be thankful — things that I will carry to the Thanksgiving Mass where I am scheduled to assist next week.

There’s more to life than just politics and law and this has provided me with a nice pause from my usual routine. There is baseball and family and faith.

Unfortunately, as you must know by now, the Phillies lost the Series to the Houston Astros, four games to two. My dad would have reminded me that it’s not as important to win the game as it is how you played it. That’s the lesson today. Play the game with honor and you will always have honor even in defeat.

But I’m left with the sentiment expressed by the late National League President Bart Giamatti on the emptiness felt by fans at season’s end: “The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall all alone.”

Alone hell, the Eagles are going to the Super Bowl, Dad!

(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every Thursday on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)

Thursday, November 10, 2022

Intolerance For Free Speech Is Spiking

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue 

There have always been extremists on the right and the left who are completely intolerant, and while both sides need to be condemned, the real danger comes more from the left. Not because the right-wing extremists are less intolerant, but because those on the left are more numerous and they occupy the command centers of our culture. 

I know from a lifetime of working with those in education, activist circles and the media just how intolerant the left can be. Indeed, I could fill a book with my personal experiences. They have kept me from getting jobs, and have tried to get me kicked out of jobs, including this one. They are masters of the politics of personal destruction. 

More objectively, we have the wholesale attacks on free speech and the destruction of property conducted by the likes of Antifa, the urban terrorists. Let's not forget about the Silicon Valley elites who gave us the cancel culture. We also have recent polling data that prove my point. 

In 2020, a Cato survey found that 77 percent of conservatives, 64 percent of moderates, and 52 percent of liberals were afraid to say what they think. Why are conservatives the most afraid? It's not because the moderates are guilty of creating a "chilling effect" on the free speech of conservatives. We know who the guilty are. 

An even more recent survey, conducted in February, and commissioned by the New York Times and Siena College, found that only 34 percent of Americans said they believed that all Americans enjoyed freedom of speech completely. It also revealed that 84 percent said it is a "very serious" or "somewhat serious" problem. 

As we shall see, Republicans and conservatives are the least likely to enjoy freedom of speech. 

On several issues, respondents were asked, "Do you feel more free, less free, or as free as you did before to express your viewpoint in most situations on a daily basis today than you did 10 years ago?" What they found was striking. 

When it comes to expressing yourself on politics, 28 percent of Democrats and 13 percent of Republicans said they felt more free; the figures for liberals and conservatives were 29 percent and 16 percent, respectively. 

On the subject of religion, 33 percent of Democrats felt more free as compared to just 14 percent of Republicans; it was 32 percent for liberals and 18 percent for conservatives. We know from many studies that Democrats and liberals are much more likely to be secularists, therefore Republicans and conservatives, who are more likely to be religious, suffer the most. 

The findings of the Catholic League survey, which were released in September, found that 62 percent of Catholics agree that “it is getting harder to practice your faith publicly in America.” While two out of three practicing Catholics (weekly and monthly churchgoers) say it is getting harder, even 58 percent of those who rarely or never go to church agree that it is. 

When asked how free they are about discussing gender identity, the majority of Democrats (54 percent) said they felt more free today but only 20 percent of Republicans felt that way. Similarly, the figures for liberals and conservatives were 58 percent and 18 percent, respectively. That's quite a difference. In other words, those who have the greatest reservations about gender identity are the most afraid of speaking their mind. 

When asked about race relations, more than twice as many Democrats (37 percent) as Republicans (15 percent) felt they were more free to discuss this issue today than they were 10 years ago. This suggests that those who don’t follow the thinking set by elites on racial issues are seen as a problem. 

None of this is hard to figure out. The ruling class has adopted the politics of the left, making it harder for conservatives and people of faith to speak their mind in public. 

Further proof of the intolerant streak on the left can be ascertained by examining the responses to a question about the limits of free speech. "While I support free speech, sometimes you have to shut down speech that is anti-democratic, bigoted or simply untrue." 

The poll found that 4l percent of Democrats and 16 percent of Republicans agreed with this statement; the figures were 39 percent for liberals and 25 percent for conservatives. 

Notice that respondents were not asked if they supported the abridgement of speech for reasons that threatened public safety: the issue was speech that someone might object to, and that is a very different matter. 

It is this kind of thinking that led the University of California, Berkeley, to recently create “Jewish-free zones” on campus, places where students can safely discuss support for Israel. That’s just how sick this state of affairs has become. This proves a point I have long made: there is more free speech allowed in neighborhood pubs than in neighborhood colleges and universities. 

We are at a serious juncture in American history. If people cannot express their political views—especially on college campuses—the entire nation is at risk.

Abortion rights were on the ballot in these 5 states. Here's what voters decided.

A number of so-called “reproductive rights” ballot initiatives enshrined abortion on-demand at any point in pregnancy in the state constitutions, though it’s worth noting that these states had already embraced abortion on-demand in their laws. Unfortunately, the task facing pro-life Americans in these states has gotten more challenging and in the meantime, citizens in these states have lost their ability to have a say on critically important policy matters. In Kentucky, robust pro-life laws remain in place and women and their babies are protected. But last night highlights that beyond ballot initiatives, the makeup of state Supreme Courts will be critically important going forward as pro-life laws are challenged in state courts. Elections come and go, but for those who believe in the inherent dignity of every human person, the goal remains the same. The pro-life movement will never shy away from the task of making abortion unthinkable. Heritage Experts: Melanie Israel and Emma Waters 

Election week on Faith On Trial

Turning Iowa Red https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/ This week we were joined by Kathie Obradovich, editor-in-chief of the Iowa Capital Dispatch to discuss Tuesday’s election returns. While not all the returns are in there were enough to see that Iowa has turned into to a red state with the sweeping victories of Gov. Kim Reynolds, Sen. Charles Grassley and the rest of the state’s congressional delegation as well as the defeat of several long-time state Democratic officials. Faith On Trial airs every Thursday at 9:30 a.m. CT on the Iowa Catholic Radio Network.

Tuesday, November 8, 2022

‘There Is Zero Accountability’: Heritage Documentary Shows Devastating Impact of Soft-on-Crime Policies on Law Enforcement

The Heritage Foundation today released a new documentary on the devastating soft-on-crime policies that are harming American communities and led to the tragic death of Sheriff’s Deputy First Class Glenn Hilliard in Maryland. On June 12, 2022, Hilliard was shot and killed by Austin Davidson, a career criminal who had 29 previous interactions with law enforcement, including a conviction for armed robbery in Baltimore City. Hilliard was shot while attempting to arrest Davidson, who was wanted on three outstanding arrest warrants. Hilliard’s death followed the decision of Baltimore City State Attorney Marilyn Mosby to not send Davidson to prison after his conviction for armed robbery. Mosby, who has a history of pro-criminal policies and sweetheart plea deals, allowed Davidson to get probation before judgment for the armed robbery and walk out of the courtroom, only to commit more crimes. Charles Stimson, a former prosecutor and deputy director for The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, added that “the murder of Deputy Sheriff Glenn Hilliard was entirely preventable had Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby done her job in the first place. Mosby failed to put the murderer in prison after an armed robbery, and then refused to revoke his probation after he committed three more violent crimes before he shot Hilliard in cold blood. That blood is on Mosby’s hands.” Heritage Expert: Cully Stimson 

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Election-Related Referenda on State Ballots

This Tuesday, voters in many states will weigh in on several election integrity-related referenda. Some are good changes that would improve election integrity; others are bad and would make elections in those states less secure; and one is downright ugly—written in a way intended to fool voters. The ugly referendum is Michigan’s Proposal 2, which would make a series of damaging changes to the state’s constitution. Everyone agrees that individuals should be able to vote “without harassing conduct,” something already banned by federal law. The proposal then says that voters should verify their “identity with a photo ID,” since voters like that requirement. But that language is there to con voters into not paying attention to the rest of the proposal, which actually guts the ID provision by saying anyone can vote if they simply sign a form claiming that they are who they say they are. The proposal also makes it legal to give money to election officials and election offices to “fund elections,” opening the door for political donors to influence how elections are administered in order to benefit their favored candidates. The Michigan proposal further creates permanent absentee ballot lists, guaranteeing that ballots will go to voters who are deceased or have moved out of state; authorizes unguarded, unmonitored, unsecured drop boxes; and says that only election officials can conduct audits, which would result in election officials auditing their own behavior—a clear conflict of interest. Heritage Expert: Hans von Spakovsky 

Monday, November 7, 2022

New Heritage Report Reveals That Blue Counties, Cities Have a Murder Problem

When you remove the crime-infested, homicide-riddled cities from the state murder rate featured in the Third Way article, you dramatically lower the murder rate for that state, upending their conclusions and exposing the article for what it really is: a straight-forward attempt at political projection dressed up as a ‘study,’” the Heritage authors write in their new report. Another claim the Left makes is that COVID-19 caused or at least contributed to the general rise in crime. But the authors note there are no reputable studies that prove that crime increased as a direct result of COVID lockdowns. “What the data does show is that crime, including violent crime, was rising in cities with the toxic trio prior to the onset of the pandemic, and that the murder of George Floyd, which happened in May 2020, resulted in a rise in murders and auto theft in key cities. Heritage Experts: Cully Stimson and Zack Smith 

Doubling Down Or Double Crossing?

By Deacon Mike Manno

(The Wanderer) – One of the issues that I’ve been watching closely during the run-up to the mid-term elections had to do with children, their schooling, what happened to close the schools for so long, and how public schools and the teachers’ unions have reacted to, and possibly encouraged, young people in their care to consider transgenderism.

In fact, while my radio program has been on the air for over six years, I think we have spent more air time on this topic in the last six months than in all of our previous air times put together. When we started, parental complaints and legal fights were usually over something we would consider mundane by today’s standards, for we have gone from kids being told they cannot pray over their food at lunch to after school drag-queen programs, Trans closets, new pronouns — but remember, don’t tell your parents. And of course, the renegade teacher that does let the secret out of the bag gets fired and has her teaching career blackballed.

As they say, we’ve come a long way, baby. Unfortunately, long or short, it’s the wrong way.

And we’ve been trying to warn parents, who are now starting to fight back against school boards and teachers’ unions who consider your kids their property to influence at will, in spite of the threat of being criminally investigated by the corrupt Biden administration and their fellow-travelers in the Department of Justice.

So, I just saw a new case about a child taken from his/her/its (hard to know anymore) parents for not accepting the young man’s (yes, that is how he was born) delusion that he should be a girl. Now this is not the first case of this sort in which a family trying to deal with this “mess” has lost custody, or even parental rights, over their unwillingness to “accept” a teenager’s decision to make the change.

Reading the case I was reminded of my early days practicing juvenile law, and how children and parents were treated in the system.

In that system there are three parties, or camps, if you will. The first are the children who, for whatever reason need — or so it is thought — the protection of the state. They are usually represented by court-appointed attorneys familiar with juvenile law and known by the judge to be at least somewhat competent. The second camp includes the parents whose actions have somehow raised some questions about their parenting ability. The third group includes the social workers from social services who investigate and with state attorneys present their findings to the court for adjudication.

The key player in this contest are the social workers from the state social service agencies. Their lawyers follow their lead and respond as any lawyer would to a client’s requests or demands. Sometimes they are able to talk sense into them when they are clearly wrong, but most of the time they dutifully follow the company line.

The next key player is the judge who is supposed to be neutral. But when the he-said, she-said conflicts surface in the court proceedings, the judges will, like their counterparts in criminal law who tend to believe the police, tend to rely on the social worker.
Thus I’ve seen some pretty questionable conduct from that camp.

Now I’m sure things have gotten better, and I know and get along with several social service workers, and would trust them with my reputation, but when I started many of those workers were opinionated and tended to jump to conclusions without giving any thought to the other side. Thus they would receive a complaint, meet with a child at school, make a decision and mom or dad were consulted only after a decision had been made.

In my later years doing this, perhaps because I became more experienced, the social workers would often ask me for my recommendations and we could sit down and dissect the facts and often come to a reasonable outcome that was satisfactory to each camp. Those social workers were invaluable to the system and worth their weight in gold — or at least chocolate.

What brought these visions of the ghost of courtrooms past was a case decided by the Court of Appeals in Indiana. The case started out simply enough, a mother was accused of verbally abusing her then 16-year-old son. The reason, apparently, was that he wanted to be a she and that did not sit well with mom who didn’t take the news well.

The child’s demeanor had changed throughout this matter. He was sullen, tended to isolate himself from others, including his parents, and changed his dining habits, rarely eating full meals, hiding his food and throwing it away. The state laid the blame at the feet of the parents who were ultimately charged with two rather serious counts of child abuse and the child was removed from the home.

As I read the court’s decision, it appeared that while the situation was difficult for the parents, they were at least trying to get their boy-girl some help with counseling and therapy, and social services was on-board with the plan, although they did have some differences.

The child involved was diagnosed with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, parent/child relationship problems, and gender dysphoria. The diagnosis was made by a neuro-psychologist. A later psychologist and sex researcher also reviewed the child’s records and opined that the child may be suffering from borderline personality disorder (BPD) rather than gender dysphoria, and reported that BPD is associated with eating disorders not gender dysphoria.

The state (social workers) then offered the family a compromise. The two charges would be dismissed and all reports expunged from the record if they would agree with a single third charge which characterized the child’s abuse as self-inflicted, thus eliminating serious repercussions against the parents. Everybody, including the child, agreed to that resolution. Naturally, the parents thought that since they were not responsible for the abuse, they would regain custody.

Wrong. The state doubled down on their position and maintained custody which was upheld by the appeals court. What happened here? What happened is not clear, but the court rejected all the parents’ claims, especially those related to the dismissed counts, and left standing the custody order which was birthed from the first set of hearings with those counts, some of which were based on the parents’ reaction to their child’s gender claims. Remember, those counts were dismissed and the reports were expunged from the record. Yet the parents and the child agreed to accepting the third count for a complete dismissal of the other counts, apparently under the belief that the child might be returned.

This brings back memories of my go-arounds with state social workers. My early experience was that oft-times the workers would befriend the parents, meeting them for lunch for a friendly discussion of the case. Once the worker had established a certain bond with the parent, promises were inferred until the next court hearing. Then the situation changed and the promises turned out to be illusory and things the parents told the worker which they thought were in confidence were placed, often with some exaggeration, on the record.

Now I hope this is not the case here, but it does bring up something I think all parents should understand. When you are dealing with a public agency that is investigating your family, use extreme caution, especially nowadays when so many are populated by “woke” employees who are bound to promote their own agenda over the public good.

Just a word of warning, I’m not suggesting that this happened here or that any party was operating with malicious intentions, only that a situation such as this is rife with opportunity for nefarious manipulation.

(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every Thursday on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial.)