The case involved two Ohio brothers,
Frank and Phil Gilardi, whom the mandate would force to either violate their
consciences or face over $14 million in fines as they run their two businesses
in the town of Sidney.
Justice Janice Rogers Brown wrote in
the decision
that “the burden of the HHS mandate “becomes substantial because the government
commands compliance by giving the Gilardis a Hobson’s choice. They can either
abide by the sacred tenets of their faith, pay a penalty of over $14 million,
and cripple the companies they have spent a lifetime building, or they become
complicit in a grave moral wrong.”
“If that is not 'substantial
pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs,' we
fail to see how the standard could be met,” she wrote.
Read the rest of the story here.
No comments:
Post a Comment