Voters in Florida will be asked in November to decide whether a “right” to abortion – at any time prior to viability, and at any time “when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider” – should be codified in the state’s constitution. The three dissenting justices, however, wrote the amendment “misleads” voters, “fails to convey the breadth of what the amendment actually accomplishes,” and includes in its language numerous “undefined terms,” such as “viability,” “health care provider,” and “patient’s health.” READ
No comments:
Post a Comment