Brandon first
applied for admission to the Radiation Therapy Program in April 2013. He met
the standards of a competitive candidate and scored the maximum points allowed
during his observation. During the interview process, college officials asked
Brandon, “What is the most important thing to you.” Brandon answered simply,
“My God.”
Brandon was
denied entry into the program. After Brandon inquired why he was denied, the
Program Director, Adrienne Dougherty, told him:
"I understand that religion is a
major part of your life and that was evident in your recommendation letters, however, this field is not the place for
religion. We have many patients
who come to us for treatment from many different religions and some who believe in nothing at all. If you
interview in the future, you may want to leave your thoughts and beliefs out of the interview process."
Brandon made
several attempts to address with defendants the discriminatory reasoning upon
which they denied his admission to the program. In response to a letter from
the ACLJ outlining CCBC’s retaliation, CCBC defended Director
Dougherty’s comments to Mr. Jenkins suggesting that such comments were merely
intended to advise Brandon that "he not wear them [his religious beliefs]
on his sleeve," and “[s]tated bluntly, that is not bad advice.”
Since Director
Dougherty’s comments, CCBC has attempted to provide additional reasons for
Brandon’s non-admission to the Program. Nonetheless, despite persistent denial
by CCBC of unfair treatment, CCBC acknowledges that Brandon lost points during
the interview process because Brandon allegedly stated that he was pursuing a
career in radiation therapy at the behest of God. This, CCBC asserts, was not
“the best answer.” CCBC further stated, "[c]andidates who describe
thoughtful considerations about what the candidate will contribute as an
individual to patients and the advancement of care make far better therapists
than those who are told by others [God] to pursue the field. . . the fact is
that in any secular job or program interview it is better to have a concrete
reason for wanting to undertake the training at hand than to say only that God
directed one to do it."
The lawsuit, filed
in federal court in the district of Maryland in Baltimore, names a number of
school officials as defendants. The complaint requests the court to declare
that the actions taken by CCBC officials violated Brandon’s First Amendment
rights and that defendants be prohibited from further retaliating and/or
discriminating against Brandon based on his religious views and/or his
expressions thereof. Further, the suit requests an injunction requiring CCBC to
admit Brandon to the Radiation Therapy Program.
The ACLJ is
defending religious freedom on campus from coast to coast. Last month, ACLJ
attorneys won a jury verdict on behalf of a Christian conservative professor
denied a promotion because of his free speech. Also last month, the ACLJ successfully
defended a Christian campus ministry from attempts to prohibit the use of
faith-based criteria in its hiring decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment