By Deacon
Mike Manno
(The
Wanderer) – I saw
last week a news story reporting that adolescent boys as they near voting age
are becoming conservative politically. Myself I’d like to see them become more
Catholic and Christian, but I suppose I can live with conservative.
Girls,
on the other hand, are trending liberal. Jean Twenger, a professor of
psychology at San Diego State University was quoted as saying, “Among liberals,
the future is female. And among conservatives, the future is male.”
My
first reaction to the news was that it was no surprise to me. For some years
I’ve been watching young boys pushed to the sidelines while schools, teachers,
and society measured conduct by a girls’ standard. Let me give you an example:
When I
was a school boy we played rough, much rougher than the girls did. The nun’s
main job in babysitting us was to make sure we didn’t permanently harm one
another. Now there were occasional fights, which usually never lasted very long
since those wonderful black-veiled women were quick to pull the offenders apart
before either received a black eye or bloody nose.
And for
guys, once the fight was over (and thank you, Sister for breaking this thing up
before I really got beat) that was it. We had shown our manhood by asserting
ourselves with our fists, and that was all we needed to prove.
You see
boys played hard. We didn’t skip rope or play Ring Around the Rosie. And, in fact, that hard playing was what
kept us calm and our fights short: We simply wore ourselves out. But in recent
years that is not what I hear happening. Boys who are a little too energized
behave outside the norms set for them. And those norms have been patterned
after how young girls play, quietly with no rough-housing. You see, the girls
were setting the decorum rules for the boys.
And, of
course, when boys began to act up — that is, like boys — the message was sent
home and far too often they were put on drugs to keep them calm. Getting the
picture?
Boys
were not allowed to act like boys; their conduct was circumscribed by rules
natural to girls. Girls were nice and sweet but the boys were ADHD.
I’ve
known a lot of schoolteachers in my lifetime and I cannot think of one who has
not told the story of a boy on Ritalin because he didn’t comport himself as the
girls did. It simply made for a better classroom. And, of course, it was
necessary to send the message to the girls that they could succeed just as a
boy could.
After
all, nowadays there is no real difference between the boys and the girls, they
are interchangeable. And the disservice is that boys are not allowed to play,
horse- play, and rough-house as boys are inclined to do. After all, a boy’s
role model should be his dad, the support and protector of the family.
Unfortunately, due to societal changes inspired by governmental programs, far
too few boys have that father figure in the home to guide them into strong
adults capable of negotiating the complex ways of today’s world.
Back in
2019 clinical psychologist Michael Alcee, Ph.D., wrote in Psychology Today:
“While
it is wonderful that society has been focused on helping girls, empowering them
not to feel like the ‘odd girl out’ and tackling issues surrounding ‘mean
girls,’ boys’ experiences, unfortunately, have often been neglected. And by
failing to zero in on this important aspect of a boy’s psychology, we not only
do boys a disservice, but we also miss the boat in treating them with the kind
of empathy that will truly help them become strong. Fortunately, this doesn’t
need to be a zero-sum game: We can empower, support, and celebrate girls and
boys at the same time.”
Years
ago, I am told, some schools tried to tie a left-handed student’s left hand to
his desk so he would learn to write with his right hand. It didn’t take long
for the professional educators involved to realize that it wouldn’t work. You
can’t force someone to be something he is not; you can’t turn a lefty into a
righty and you can’t turn an energetic young boy into a hop-scotch fan. It’s as
simple as that. Eventually you have to untie the left hand, just like you have
to let boys act out their natural personhood.
But I
don’t think that has been the experience for far too many boys in this critical
period of their lives. They have been demoralized and demonized, warned to
avoid all that toxic masculinity that is running the country and the world. Far
too many grow up in either female-headed households, or whose only male role
model is some transient companion picked up to take care of mom’s needs with
little regard to the effect they will have on the adolescent boys in the home.
So,
while the nation was warned about toxic masculinity, the boys were suffering
from toxic femininity by being measured against girls’ social development, not
their own.
This
was illustrated to me by a cable-TV commentary on a fight at a major league
baseball game. Those brawls happen and they oftentimes clear the benches as one
team tries to stand up for one of their own. In this particular case there were
four hosts, two women and two men.
They
split on their view of the fight, with the women calling it unprofessional and
unsportsmanlike, and the men took the position that while it may not be a very
good part of the game, these things happen and, in effect, the guys will be
guys.
Now you
might ask: What about all the riots and gang violence we see on the news these
days? Aren’t most of those people guys? That’s right, we do see them. If I
might be permitted to make this observation: Most of those you see have not had
the role models — male and female — needed to develop into true adulthood.
So now
look at the boy-problem from the boys’ perspective. For all his life he has
been told to play nice like his sister, his growth dynamic has been pooh-poohed
by teachers and administrators, and many were raised by single moms who lack
the skills to raise a boy without a male role model. And on top of that,
society is now telling him that there is no difference between boys and girls,
unless a girl accuses you of something, then she must be believed.
Is it
any wonder they are becoming conservatives? They are growing into manhood and that
tie on the left hand has to be broken. A boy is a man and a man should be a
man.
Any
wonder who these new conservatives will vote for? Someone they see as filling a
very masculine role: leader, defender, national father.
Sorry, Joe. It won’t be you.
(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every weekend on Faith On Trial or podcast at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)
Agree with you a 100%
ReplyDelete