Grand Rapids, MI—First Liberty Institute filed a federal lawsuit against University of Michigan Health – West on behalf of Valerie Kloosterman, a physician assistant terminated after she sought a religious accommodation from referring patients for sex-obscuring procedures and experimental drugs, and from using biology-obscuring pronouns.
You can read the complaint here.
“Because Valerie wouldn't violate her conscience, Michigan
Health violated her rights and ended her employment,” said Kayla Toney, Counsel
for First Liberty Institute. “It is blatantly intolerant of Michigan Health to
demand that medical professionals like Valerie abandon their religious beliefs
in order to remain employed. Valerie loves her community and her
job. She is devastated that the University of Michigan health system
derided her beliefs and demanded that she choose between her faith and
providing health care.”
As the third generation in her family to work in her local
health care system, Kloosterman served her community for 17 years at Michigan
Health. She regularly received exemplary reviews, and supervisors called
her “professional,” “very ethical,” and a “pleasure to work with.” She
treated all her patients respectfully, regardless of their background, sexual
orientation, or declared gender. In summer 2021, after mandatory
“diversity and inclusion” training, she asked for a religious accommodation
because she could not affirm statements about gender that violated her
Christian beliefs, nor could she participate by referring patients for
sex-obscuring surgeries or using pronouns that conflicted with human
biology. During follow-up meetings, a Michigan Health diversity
representative called Kloosterman “evil,” blamed her for gender
dysphoria-related suicides, and told her she could not take the Bible or her
religious beliefs to work with her. Less than a month later, she was
fired.
In the lawsuit, First Liberty attorneys state, “Defendants
targeted Ms. Kloosterman for termination because she requested an accommodation
for her religious beliefs. Defendants also violated the Free Exercise
Clause of the First Amendment, as incorporated against the states via the
Fourteenth Amendment, when they granted secular accommodations to other
employees regarding common drugs and medical procedures while failing to grant
a religious accommodation to Ms. Kloosterman regarding much more rare drugs and
medical procedures.”
No comments:
Post a Comment