WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week a Texas court protected the rights
of families and their doctors to
make medical decisions for their child free
from government bureaucrats’ interference.
The
court ruling comes after eight states, an association of almost
18,000 doctors, and a Catholic hospital system challenged a federal regulation that requires
doctors to perform gender transition procedures on children, even if the
doctor believes the treatment could harm the child. Doctors who followed
their Hippocratic Oath to act in the best interest of their patient would
have faced severe consequences, including losing their job.
“This
is a common-sense ruling: The government has no business forcing privte
doctors to perform procedures on children that the government
itself recognizes can be harmful and exempts its own doctors from
performing,” said Lori Windham, senior counsel at Becket Law, which filed a lawsuit against the new federal regulation.
“Today’s ruling ensures that doctors’ best medical judgment will not be
replaced with political agendas and bureaucratic interference.”
The new regulation
applied to over 900,000 doctors—nearly every doctor in the U.S.—and would
have cost healthcare providers and taxpayers nearly $1 billion. The
government itself does not require its own military doctors to perform
these procedures. It also does not
require coverage of gender transition procedures in Medicare or
Medicaid—even for adults—because
HHS’s medical experts that oversee those programs did not
believe medical research demonstrates that gender
reassignment surgery improves health outcomes, with some studies
demonstrating that these procedures were in fact harmful. But under
the HHS rule developed by political appointees, doctors citing the
same evidence and using their best medical judgment in an
individual case would have faced potential lawsuits or job loss.
A
recent website provides
leading research on this issue, including guidance the government itself
relies on, demonstrating that up to 94 percent of children with gender
dysphoria (77 to 94 percent in one set of studies and 73 to 88 percent in
another) will grow out of their dysphoria naturally and live healthy leaves
without the need for surgery or lifelong hormone regimens.
“This
court ruling is an across-the-board victory that
will ensure that the deeply personal medical
decision of a gender transition procedure
remain between families and their doctor,” said Windham.
Becket Law
defended Franciscan Alliance, a religious hospital network sponsored by
the Sisters of St. Francis of Perpetual Adoration, and the Christian Medical
& Dental Associations from the new government regulation. The States of
Texas, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Kentucky, Kansas, Louisiana, Arizona, and
Mississippi joined Becket’s legal challenge. More information can
be found at www.transgendermandate.org.
|
Faith on Trial is where we examine the influence of law and society on people of faith. Here we will look at those cases and events that impinge on the rights of people to fully practice their faith. Faith on Trial is heard every Saturday at 2 p.m. and Sunday at 9 p.m. on the Iowa Catholic Radio Network and anytime on our podcast at : https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/.
Monday, January 2, 2017
Court strikes down harmful transgender mandate; Ruling protects children, doctors, and hospitals from federal regulation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment