“Pregnant women in Raleigh should be
allowed to choose Hand of Hopes’ free help and support and should not be
limited to an abortion clinic. Those who go to Preferred Women’s Health will
not be fully informed about their choices.” said Hand of Hope’s Executive
Director Tonya Baker Nelson.
Earlier this year, Hand of Hope went
through the zoning process and obtained favorable votes from the Citizen
Advisory Council and Planning Commission. From a land use perspective, the
Planning Commission and City Zoning Staff unanimously found that Hand of Hope’s
use was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the
surrounding area. In fact, Hand of Hope was pleased that the City’s official
plan adopted in 2013 was to rezone the property that would have allowed for the
ministry’s needs. Nevertheless, the City Council ignored its own staff, the
Planning Commission and Citizen Advisory Council and voted to deny Hand of
Hope’s zoning request on July 5, 2016.
Though the City’s plan is to eventually rezone the property, the City Council
indicated that it would be “premature” to rezone it now.
The City Council and City Attorney
further defended the decision by citing their power and “wide discretion” to
decide what is the best use for Hand of Hope’s property. The lawsuit however
claims that the City’s power and discretion is limited by the United States
Constitution and the Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act.
This federal law was passed in 2000 after Congress uncovered widespread
discrimination against religious organizations in land use regulations across
the country.
“The City Council is not above the
law and tried to hide their political power play. Thankfully, the federal law
was put in place to prevent politicians from masking their political
preferences behind broad discretionary regulations,” said attorney Noel Sterett
of Mauck & Baker in Chicago, representing Hand of Hope. “I hope we can all
agree that our freedoms, property rights, and a woman’s right to be fully
informed should not be subject to the political whims and discretion of a few
city council members,” added Sterett.
Read the lawsuit filed by Mauck
& Baker in Federal Court here.
No comments:
Post a Comment