Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denies constitutional rights
to Marine
court-martialed over a Bible verse
court-martialed over a Bible verse
WASHINGTON, DC – Today,
the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) issued an opinion in the case
of United States v. Sterling, denying a United States Marine her
constitutional right to religious freedom.
“This is absolutely outrageous,” Kelly Shackelford,
President and CEO of First Liberty Institute, says. "A few judges decided
they could strip a Marine of her constitutional rights just because they didn’t
think her beliefs were important enough to be protected. If they can
court-martial a Marine over a Bible verse, what’s to stop them from punishing
service members for reading the Bible, taking about their faith, or praying?”
"General Patton famously prayed on the eve of battle,”
Mike Berry, Director of Military Affairs for First Liberty Institute, says.
“According to the majority opinion, if General Patton couldn't prove how
important praying was to him, he could be court-martialed for his prayer."
“This is shameful, it’s wrong, and it sets a terrible
precedent, jeopardizing the constitutional rights of every single man and woman
in military service,” Shackelford says. “We will appeal directly to the U.S.
Supreme Court. This cannot be allowed to stand."
First Liberty Institute, along with former solicitor
general of the United States, Paul Clement, of Bancroft PLLC, represented LCpl Monifa
Sterling at an April hearing before the CAAF. LCpl Sterling was court-martialed
for refusing to take a Bible verse down from her workspace.
Read more and view legal documents at SterlingFacts.com.
About
First Liberty Institute
First
Liberty Institute is the largest legal organization in the nation
dedicated exclusively to defending religious freedom for all Americans.
No comments:
Post a Comment