Faith on Trial is where we examine the influence of law and society on people of faith. Here we will look at those cases and events that impinge on the rights of people to fully practice their faith. Faith on Trial is heard every Saturday at 2 p.m. and Sunday at 9 p.m. on the Iowa Catholic Radio Network and anytime on our podcast at : https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/.
Monday, August 12, 2024
Saturday, August 10, 2024
Vatican officials deny involvement in rumored Latin Mass crackdown
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Two of the four Vatican officials reported to be aiding efforts to restrict the traditional Mass have denied any such involvement, whilst rumors not always in accord with evidence continue to stoke fears of upcoming restrictions.
The papal nuncio to France, Archbishop
Celestino Migliore, and the prefect of the Dicastery for Eastern Churches,
Cardinal Claudio Gugerotti, have both denied to this correspondent that they
are involved in fresh efforts to restrict the traditional Mass.
Both Migliore and Gugerotti had been
named in a June report by The Remnant, along with
Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, as being the three key aides in a
move to compile a new document ushering in restrictions on the traditional
Mass.
The document is believed to be being
written by Archbishop Vittorio Francesco Viola, who serves as the Secretary of
the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments (CDW), and
who – according to some reports – is drawing up a text restricting the
traditional Mass which he will present to Pope Francis for approval.
But when questioned by this
correspondent, Migliore and Gugerotti denied that they were supporting or
encouraging Viola in his project. Full details are provided below, but first
some background and context is necessary.
Background
to rumors
On June 17, the traditional blog Rorate
Caeli issued a report suggesting that the Vatican is set to publish new
measures restricting the traditional Mass even further than it already
is. Rorate wrote that there is an attempt to implement a
“stringent, radical, and final solution banning the Traditional Latin Mass.”
Describing their sources as
“credible,” Rorate stated that the sources for the information
were
the very same sources that revealed
to Rorate that the Vatican had sent out a survey to bishops
on Summorum Pontificum (in preparation for what would
become Traditionis Custodes), and Rorate was
the first source to post this; and the very same sources who
first revealed that a document like Traditionis Custodes would
come (and Rorate was also the first to reveal
it at the time). [Emphasis original]
Rorate’s report was published by one of the site’s editors known as “New Catholic”: this correspondent understands that “New Catholic” has kept information about his sources strictly to himself.
Where
would it come from?
No information was given by Rorate as
to which body of the Roman Curia would be leading operations in issuing any new
document. Were it to affect the former Ecclesia Dei traditional Mass
communities, then it would have to also involve the Congregation (now
Dicastery) for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life
(CICLSAL).
However, with Pope Francis having
just recently met with, and affirmed the charism of, the two most
notable ex-Ecclesia Dei communities offering the traditional Mass – the FSSP and the ICKSP –
it is therefore unlikely that restrictions would be ushered in against them via
CICLSAL, and would therefore be issued via the CDW.
Indeed when this correspondent
questioned the notoriously anti-traditional prefect
of CICLSAL – Cardinal João Braz de Aviz – if his dicastery had any document
restricting the traditional Mass, his secretary issued a reply July 4, stating:
We cannot answer your question because
the topic is not our responsibility but that of the Dicastery
for Divine Worship. [Emphasis original]
Such would correspond with the
information reported by The Remnant, which cited “well-informed
sources” as stating that the rumored document “would prohibit all priests other
than those belonging to approved ex-Ecclesia Dei institutes from offering
the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the Vetus Ordo, or old rite
as it is commonly called.” This would involved the CDW, rather than CICLSAL.
It appears from these two aspects that
the rumored document would originate from the offices of the CDW, and chiefly
by the hand of Archbishop Viola.
Disagreement
over existence of document
But sources disagree on the existence of the document. Rorate was the first to report that it existed and has maintained that position, with The Remnant following suit in supporting the argument some days later.
“I have been informed by reliable
sources that a new Vatican document more restrictive than Traditionis
Custodes does indeed exist, is backed by Vatican Secretary of State
Cardinal Pietro Parolin, and has been presented to Pope Francis,” wrote Diane
Montagna for The Remmant.
Well-placed Vatican sources close to
Pope Francis questioned by this correspondent could not attest to the existence
of the document. They highlighted the confusion emanating from the Vatican
about the current state of affairs regarding the future of the traditional
Mass, though none of the sources consulted denied that such a document might
exist.
Nor has The Pillar been
able to confirm existence of the rumored document, despite its record of having
talkative and apparently well-placed sources throughout the Vatican and
especially in the Secretariat of State – the office led by Cardinal Parolin,
who is reportedly a key advocate of measures to restrict the traditional Mass.
Cardinal Arthur Roche – prefect
of the CDW – and Parolin have not replied to email questions by this
correspondent about the rumored document. Roche has, in the meantime, blocked this correspondent on a social media platform.
A source previously informed LifeSiteNews’ John-Henry Westen that the rumored
document was likely to be published on July 16, the third anniversary of Traditionis
Custodes, the 2021 motu proprio through which Francis
ushered in sweeping restrictions on the traditional Mass. The date swiftly
became the international focus of much hype, both in the media and for
Catholics outside of the media bubble.
The reports – by Rorate and The Remnant –
which attested to the existence of the document did not give any details about
such a date. Nothing was issued by the Vatican on July 16, with the month
officially being a quieter holiday period for Pope Francis.
Vatican
officials deny involvement
While Rorate’s original
reports had been sparse in providing details of any fresh restrictions, The
Remnant’s report provided names of its alleged proponents and
details of its alleged contents.
As noted above, papal nuncio Migliore
– who is noted for his stance opposing the traditional Mass in France – was
listed as a key supporter, along with the prefect of the Dicastery for Eastern
Churches Cardinal Gugerotti and Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Parolin.
After 21 years as a nuncio, Gugerotti
returned to the Dicastery for Eastern Church in 2022 as its prefect, having
served as an official in the Dicastery for 16 years prior to his diplomatic
service. He was raised to the cardinalate last September.
Cardinal Parolin
(center) with Abp Gugerotti (R) in 2015. Credit: Paval Hadsinzki/Flickr
Following The Remnant’s June
25 report, this correspondent contacted both Migliore and Gugerotti on July 19
asking if they would comment on the report and if they were giving “support or
assistance or encouragement to an attempt by Archbishop Vittoria Viola, who is
preparing a new document on the ‘Latin Mass.’”
Migliore swiftly replied by saying:
Short question, short answer: these
are conjectures, to say the least, fanciful.
Gugerotti’s private secretary replied
August 6 with a less direct statement, which nevertheless appeared to distance
the cardinal from the rumored document. The reply read:
Thank you for your kind request, of
which His Eminence Cardinal Claudio Gugerotti, Prefect of the Dicastery for the
Oriental Churches, has taken careful note. In this regard, I would like to
inform you that no information appears on the subject to which you refer.
Parolin has yet to reply to the same
question posed to Migliore and Gugerotti.
Denials
and confusion
In early 2023, similar rumors abounded
that Cardinal de Aviz was set to issue issue a document which would usher in
hefty restrictions on the former Ecclesia Dei communities. This
correspondent managed to meet with de Aviz on April 5 last year, and
the cardinal firmly denied that his dicastery was going to issue any such
document and that he was not aware of any such document.
The rumored text never emerged, though
the strong body of evidence from multiple sources speaking to multiple news
outlets and journalists indicated that the document did indeed exist, despite
Cdl. de Aviz’s denial. This correspondent’s own Vatican sources also attested
to the fact that the document did exist, with the sources adding that the only
question was whether it might be published or not.
With the official denials of Migliore
and Gugerotti about their involvement in the rumored 2024 document, in the face
of reports which named them as specifically involved, the confusion over the
entire case appears to grow.
The Remnant places
faith in its sources which name the pair amongst the three key supporters of
Archbishop Viola; should a document soon emerge and Migliore and Gugerotti be
found to have been supporting it, then they would have lied on record to a
journalist.
In the meantime, Argentine Catholic
blog Caminante Wanderer (CW) published a July 22 report (translated and republished by Rorate) which attested that
Francis had actually received a copy of the rumored document but had not signed
it. CW suggested that this was partly due to Francis not being as devoted to
attacking the Latin Mass as Abp. Viola is – as highlighted already – but partly due to the outpouring of
petitions and vocal calls defending the Mass made in recent weeks.
However, in an apparent discrepancy
with official details, CW stated that Cardinal Roche had fallen out of favor
with Francis – an aspect which sources for multiple outlets do confirm – and
that he had not been received in papal audience since February 2022.
Official records of the Pope’s
audiences show that Roche was received by Francis in June 2022 with the leadership of the CDW. Roche was then
received again in January 2023, in February 2023, and (with the CDW leadership) in September 2023.
Either the Holy See’s records are not
accurate or the sources for that aspect of CW’s report were not informed
correctly.
Whatever the case, it serves to
highlight the immense confusion and lack of clarity surrounding the entire
affair, with numerous Catholics concerned over the future of the traditional
Mass. With denials, contradictory evidence and rumors circulating, the truth of
the affair appears elusive in many respects.
Parents and Teachers Allowed to Join Proposed Class Action Against “Parental Exclusion Policies”
Federal Judge Roger T. Benitez Permits Thomas More Society to Proceed with Proposed Class Action
San Diego – On August 8,
2024, U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez allowed Thomas More Society
attorneys to join parents and additional teachers and proceed to file the
proposed class action complaint in Mirabelli
v. Olson. The federal court
order also permits the addition of California Attorney General Rob Bonta
as a defendant in the proposed class action lawsuit challenging “Parental
Exclusion Policies.”
On June
7, 2024, Thomas More Society asked the federal court to permit additional teachers, parents, and a school
district, to be part of a proposed class action lawsuit, as representatives
seeking class-wide relief. While the August 8 order from Judge Benitez denied
the addition of a school district-plaintiff, Lakeside Union School District, it
does allow the case to proceed forward with added parents and teachers, along
with their associated classes and claims.
Paul Jonna, Thomas More Society Special
Counsel and Partner at LiMandri & Jonna LLP, reacted:
“We are incredibly pleased that
Judge Benitez has granted our motion for leave to amend our complaint in Mirabelli v. Olson, permitting us to
proceed forward with filing a statewide class action lawsuit that includes both
teachers and parents. We intend to file a motion for class certification in
short order, which will seek to expand our case to secure class-wide protection
for not only the teachers forced to keep parents in the dark through
unconstitutional Parental Exclusion Policies, but for all parents who seek this
critical information about their school-aged children.”
“Moreover, we look forward to
prosecuting this case against California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose
addition to the suit has now been permitted with this order. Despite the clarity
in the law brought by the federal preliminary injunction we won before Judge
Benitez in Mirabelli v. Olson, in
September 2023, Attorney General Bonta has ignored it, and state officials have
pursued legal action in open defiance of the court’s order. In doing so,
Attorney General Bonta is at the tip of the spear of the institutional push to
unconstitutionally violate the rights of parents and teachers. Our clients hope
to put this issue to rest once and for all—by obtaining class-wide relief on
behalf of all teachers and parents.”
Read the
Order Granting-In-Part and Denying-In-Part Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend in Mirabelli, et al. v. Olson, et al., filed
by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez, on August 8, 2024,
in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of California, here.
About
Thomas More Society
Thomas More Society is a national
not-for-profit law firm dedicated to restoring respect in law for life, family,
and freedom. Headquartered in Chicago and with offices across the country,
Thomas More Society fosters support for these causes by providing high quality
pro bono legal services from local trial courts all the way up to the United
States Supreme Court. For more information, please visit thomasmoresociety.org.
ANALYSIS: Harris on Crime and Abortion
|
ON CRIME: “Harris
faces a serious problem,” writes CatholicVote’s Anthony Iafrate: “no matter
which way she turns, she finds people blasting her crime policies one way or
another.” Is Harris really the tough-on-crime prosecutor many of her campaign
ads claim she is? Is she the soft-on-crime candidate who solicited donations
to bail out violent rioters in 2020? Or is she the authoritarian “cop” who
wrongfully imprisoned black men in California? READ
|
Friday, August 9, 2024
Thursday, August 8, 2024
Wednesday, August 7, 2024
Catholicvote, others respond to new Harris-Walz ticket
A chorus of critics are voicing concerns over Walz’s gubernatorial record and the newly minted Harris-Walz ticket’s agenda. “Harris-Walz is the most anti-Catholic ticket ever,” stated CatholicVote President Brian Burch. “Gov. Walz’s COVID lockdowns, mandates, and ‘stay-at-home orders’ were some of the harshest in the nation – and they targeted the Church in particular.” READ
Friday, August 2, 2024
Florida pro-life leader sues Google
A Catholic pro-life leader in Florida is suing Google for de-platforming her after the tech giant suspended her email account. Trudy Perez-Poveda sent an email on September 23, 2023 to members of Family for Life, her pro-life group which peacefully prays, counsels, and holds Mass and Eucharistic processions outside abortion facilities in Jacksonville, Florida. She had used the account for over 11 years. READ
CatholicVote confronts Biden-Harris DOJ on church attacks
In a letter to Biden-Harris Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, CatholicVote President Brian Burch wrote that the administration “has repeatedly met and coordinated with the abortion industry, but has refused to meet with representatives of the millions of pro-life Americans and concerned Catholic citizens who are being threatened and intimidated across the country.” READ
Biden-Harris admin okayed ‘trans’ drug despite knowing risks
According to an internal email, the Biden-Harris administration’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) greenlit hormonal drugs for children despite acknowledging that it could lead to an increased suicide rate among minors. “We did find increased risk of depression and suicidality, as well as increased seizure risk … there is definitely a need for these drugs to be approved for gender transition.” READ
Monday, July 29, 2024
Report from the Iowa Catholic Conference
|
Saturday, July 27, 2024
Olympics Opening Ceremony features people in ‘drag’ appearing to mock the Last Supper
CV NEWS FEED // The Paris 2024 Olympics Opening Ceremony
this week featured a display of a group of people wearing “drag” costumes
appearing to mock the Last Supper, sparking outcry from Catholics and
non-Catholic Christians on social media.
Footage from the opening event shows a woman wearing a
large crown headpiece standing by the center of a long table, and on both sides
of her are people wearing drag costumes. Especially alarming is that a child is
present at the table, Collin Rugg pointed out in a July 26 X post.
Per news outlet Deadline:
“Recreating a runway to showcase the fashion Paris is known for, a group of
drag queens appeared on screen positioned similarly to how Jesus and his Twelve
Apostles are depicted in Leonardo da Vinci’s mural painting.”
Catholics, non-Catholic Christians, and some non-Christians
on X have spoken out against the display, including a Catholic bishop, who has
called for prayers of reparation.
Podcast host Clint Russell posted on his X account on July 26 a video clip of
the display, writing:
There are 2.4 billion Christians on
earth and apparently the Olympics wanted to declare loudly to all of them,
right out of the gate
NOT WELCOME
Dom Lucre posted on his X account more footage from the
shocking display, writing: “The dancing blue man featured in the 2024 World
Olympic Games opening ceremony is now being placed in the middle of the red
carpet to represent being the ‘dish’ in the drag queen recreation of Jesus Last
Supper. How could a Catholic nation allow this?”
Marion Maréchal, a member of the European Parliament, posted on X on July 26: “To all the Christians of
the world who are watching the #Paris2024 ceremony and felt insulted by this
drag queen parody of the Last Supper, know that it is not France that is
speaking but a left-wing minority ready for any provocation. #notinmyname”
Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker, a
Catholic, posted a clip
of the display on X, and above the video posted a quote from Galatians: “’Be
not deceived, God is not mocked. For what things a man shall sow, those also
shall he reap. For he that soweth in his flesh, of the flesh also shall reap
corruption. But he that soweth in the spirit, of the spirit shall reap life
everlasting.’ Galatians 6:7-8″
In a July 26 video post on X, Bishop Robert Barron of the
Diocese of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, decried the display as a “gross,
flippant mockery” of the Last Supper.
He explained that he initially started watching the Olympic
Opening Ceremonies. He then saw “this gross mockery of the Last Supper.”
“France felt, evidently, as it is trying to put its best
cultural foot forward, the right thing to do is to mock this very central
moment in Christianity, where Jesus, in His Last Supper, gives His Body and
Blood in anticipation of the cross,” he also said.
Bishop Barron later remarked, “This deeply secularist,
post-modern society knows who its enemy is, they’re naming it, and we should
believe them. They’re telling us who they are. We should believe them. But
furthermore, we Christians, we Catholics should not be sheepish. We should
resist. We should make our voices heard.”
Bishop Donald Hying of the Diocese of Madison, Wisconsin,
in a post on X,
called for fasting and prayers in reparation for the blasphemy.
“In reparation for the blasphemy in Paris, let’s fast and
pray, renew our devotion to the Eucharist, the Sacred Heart and the Virgin
Mary. May Jesus be adored and loved in every tabernacle throughout the world.
Thank you Lord for the Eucharist and the Last Supper, your love for us,” he
wrote.
Friday, July 26, 2024
Jane’s Revenge Vandals Plead Guilty to Felonies
Tampa, FL—Attorneys with First Liberty Institute and Lawson Huck Gonzalez, PLLC announced that four vandals associated with Jane’s Revenge who sought to injure, intimidate, and interfere with access to several Florida pregnancy resource centers, including Heartbeat of Miami, pleaded guilty to felony charges related to violence last year. Charges against the four were brought under the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (“FACE”) Act just before First Liberty and Attorney General Ashley Moody also filed civil lawsuits authorized under FACE on behalf of several life-affirming reproductive health facilities in Florida.
Attorney
General Moody said,
“We will not allow radicals to threaten and intimidate women seeking help from
crisis pregnancy centers or the counselors and health care professionals
serving these women and their babies. In Florida, illegal actions have
consequences, and I am proud of the work our attorneys did in this case to make
sure these extremists were held accountable.”
“Women who
seek care at life-affirming reproductive health care facilities should never
fear for their safety,” said Jason Gonzalez, shareholder at Lawson Huck
Gonzalez, PLLC. “We are grateful that AG Moody has led the effort to not
only protect our client, but every life-affirming reproductive health facility
across the State of Florida.”
“The entry
of these felony plea agreements serves as a reminder that no one should suffer
violence for simply providing faith-based counseling and baby supplies to women
and their babies,” said First Liberty Senior Counsel, Jeremy Dys. “Attorney
General Moody’s leadership, together with our lawsuit, sends a clear message:
those who target life-affirming reproductive health facilities with violence
will face the legal penalties Congress established for their crimes.”
Last year,
First Liberty Institute and Lawson Huck Gonzalez, PLLC filed a lawsuit similar
to one filed by Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody seeking to assess
$170,000 in penalties against each defendant. General Moody’s lawsuit is
the first instance of a state attorney general to use the FACE Act to hold
violent protestors of life-affirming pregnancy care centers accountable for
their actions.
Following
the leak of the Dobbs decision,
vandals associated with Jane’s Revenge began attacking faith-based pregnancy
resource centers across the nation. Vandals spray painted threatening
messages like “If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you,” fire-bombed
life-affirming reproductive health facilities, broke windows, doxxed the staff,
board, and volunteers of pregnancy resource centers, and disrupted private
events with supporters in an effort to intimidate those centers, injure their
facilities, and interfere with clients seeking to access their free services.
Heartbeat
of Miami (“Heartbeat”) is a religious ministry providing life-affirming
reproductive health services to women and couples facing unplanned pregnancies
in Hialeah, Florida. First Liberty’s lawsuit, filed on behalf of
Heartbeat, alleged that Caleb Freestone and Amber Marie Smith-Stewart, as
representatives of Jane’s Revenge, vandalized Heartbeat’s clinic with spray
painted threats on July 3, 2022. Annarella Rivera then allegedly joined
Caleb Freestone on September 17, 2022 to hack their way onto Heartbeat’s guest
list, giving them access into Heartbeat’s annual gala where they shouted
obscenities, disparaged Heartbeat’s staff, volunteers, and supporters, and
leafletted the venue with propaganda hoping to dissuade women from using
Heartbeat’s services. On January 18, 2023, a federal grand jury issued a
criminal indictment against Freestone and Smith-Stewart.



