Murrieta, CA— Today, two female high school athletes from California, K.S. and T.S., along with their families, and the Save Girls’ Sports association, filed an amended federal lawsuit against the State of California, Riverside Unified School District, and school officials. The lawsuit now challenges AB 1266, the radical California law that requires schools to allow biological males to compete in girls’ sports and use female bathrooms. This law conflicts with federal Title IX protections, which were established to ensure fairness, safe, and equal opportunities for female students and athletes.
AB 1266
undermines female athletes, forcing them to compete against biological males
who hold undeniable physical advantages. This is not equality. This is an
assault on fairness and safety.
As a result
of AB 1266 and the school district’s discriminatory practices, school officials
removed T.S. from the girls’ varsity cross-country team and replaced her with a
biological male who had previously broken female cross-country records at
another high school. In an effort to speak out against this unfair treatment,
T.S. and K.S. wore shirts displaying the message “Save Girls’ Sports” and “It’s
Common Sense. XX ≠ XY.” However, school officials then ordered them to remove
or cover the messages, labeling the shirts as “hostile” and comparing the
shirts to swastikas.
The lawsuit
names California Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond and
Attorney General Rob Bonta for enforcing AB 1266, along with Riverside Unified
School District officials Principal Leann Iacuone and Assistant Principal
Amanda Chann, who discriminated against K.S., T.S., and members of the Save
Girls’ Sports Association.
Since filing
the lawsuit, more than 200 students have worn the “Save Girls’ Sports” shirts
on campus in solidarity with K.S. and T.S., sending a clear message to school
administrators and State officials that discrimination against female athletes
will not be tolerated.
Plaintiffs
seek a federal ruling that AB 1266 violates Title IX as well as a decision
holding the District accountable for violating their First Amendment rights.
They demand injunctive relief to stop schools from forcing biological girls to
compete with and against males, a judgment affirming sex-based protections in
athletics, and compensation for damages caused by these discriminatory
policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment