Wednesday, February 19, 2014

School will allow pro-gay posters but not pro-life ones! Thomas More Society enters fray in support of pro-life student group

Wilson High School in Tacoma, Washington has received a letter from the Thomas More Society, a Chicago-based public interest law firm, demanding that the school end its discriminatory treatment of a pro-life student group. Wilson Students for Life (“WSFL was established in the Fall of 2013 “loudly proclaim the pro-life message.”  Since its founding, the group has faced constant hostility from the school’s administration, such as forbidding the group to hang its posters or host certain events, while other student groups have faced no similar restrictions.

Students for Life Poster
“Public schools have a duty to treat all student groups equally,” said Peter Breen, Vice President and Senior Counsel of the Thomas More Society.  “Wilson High School’s current policy allows administrators to censor any messages they deem ‘offensive’—in this case, any pro-life message—while allowing other groups broad freedom of speech.  The administration is violating the rights of the students involved in Wilson Students for Life, who do not lose their constitutionally protected freedom of speech when they enter the schoolhouse door.”

The group selected two posters to promote its club and asked the administration’s permission to hang these posters.  The first read “Since Roe v. Wade 1/3 of our generation has been aborted” with a picture of a milk carton and the word “missing” above the photo of a baby. The second poster quotes President Ronald Reagan: “I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion is already born.”

The administration refused to give WSFL permission to hang the posters.  The administration stated that the school policy only allows posters that “do not offend staff or students, put others down if they have a different belief/opinion, or otherwise cause disruption.”  WSFL’s posters, the administration maintained, would violate this policy because they promote a message rather than solely promoting the group’s meetings.

Despite this policy, however, the administration has permitted the Wilson Gay Straight Alliance (“GSA”) to hang flyers, for example, promoting homosexual relationships by showing conjoined male symbols and conjoined female symbols and stating “Love knows no limits.” 

After the administration’s denial of WSFL’s posters, school administrators met with WSFL leaders to “give them advice” on how to best run their club.  On student said he left the meeting feeling like his group was encouraged to only host events after school, while other groups were allowed to do what they wanted during the school day. 

“The Wilson High School administration cannot be allowed to trample on the constitutional rights of Wilson Students for Life,” said Kristan Hawkins, President of Students for Life of America. “Our pro-life students will not accept their right to free speech being taken away. Sadly, this case shows that viewpoint discrimination is alive and well in today’s schools and that administrators think they can still get away with it.  Students for Life of America is proud to stand with Wilson Students for Life to demand that the Wilson High School administration reverse their unjust decision and give equal treatment to all students and student groups, regardless of their views on abortion.”

The federal Equal Access Act requires that schools give each student group the same opportunities, without discriminating against any group.  In 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that a Washington school which gave one group access to its bulletin boards must give that access to all student groups.  Moreover, a number of Supreme Court decisions, such as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Sch. Dist., have held that students’ speech cannot be silenced simply because the administration has vague fears of disruption.

“Wilson Students for Life is passionate about the pro-life movement,” stated Bryce Asberg, Founder of Wilson Students for Life, “and we will continue to stand for life in our community. We simply desire to be allowed to express our views.”

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

University removes ‘offensive’ pro-life display without notifying pro-life student group

A University of Alabama official removed a previously approved pro-life student group’s hallway display last week without any notification to the group after she claimed that some students found the display offensive. Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent the student group, Bama Students for Life, which provided a letter to the university Tuesday to register a formal complaint about the incident.

The display, which featured several abortion-related facts, pictures of women who died as a result of having an abortion, and two small pictures of aborted babies, was among numerous other student group displays. A university official claimed that university policy allows her to remove displays that have “offensive or graphic material”; however, the university’s policy pertaining to display cases mentions nothing about offensive or graphic content.


“Universities are supposed to be the marketplace of ideas, not arenas for censoring particular viewpoints just because someone feels offended,” said Legal Counsel Matt Sharp. “We support Bama Students for Life and look forward to continuing to working with them to ensure that their constitutional freedoms are protected.”

On Jan. 17, Bama Students for Life placed the display in a display case it reserved in a hallway of the Ferguson Student Center. When the club’s president and another member of the club went to check on the display Feb. 6, they found that the university had removed it. They went to the center’s event coordinator to ask what happened. The coordinator told the students that she removed the display after receiving complaints that its content was offensive.

As the letter to the university states, “We believe that the removal of our pro-life display violates our First Amendment right to free speech. The United States Supreme Court has said that educators cannot ban offensive speech…. The Ferguson Center permits all kinds of speech by other students and student groups that many people would find ‘offensive’ or ‘graphic.’”

“For example,” the letter continues, “on one bulletin board is an ad for the UA Theatre & Dance program’s presentation of ‘Blood Wedding.’ The poster states that the event is ‘For Mature Audiences’ and features blood stained glass superimposed on a picture of a bride and groom. A few months ago the Ferguson Center Art Gallery displayed student artwork, and one painting showed male full frontal nudity. Other student groups are also permitted to display information about women’s health, safety issues, and the consequences of sex. All of these problems were addressed in our pro-life display that provided facts and information on the harm caused by abortion--both to the infant who is killed and to the mother.”

“This incident is yet another all-too-common example of university administrations attempting to silence speech with which they or others disagree,” said Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, which honored Bama Students for Life as its 2014 Group of the Year. “Bama Students for Life deserves to have its rights protected, and we look forward to the university righting this wrong.”

County fair discriminates against Catholic religious speech by denying group’s application to renew its fair booth

The Thomas More Society, a Chicago-based public interest law firm, together with Wisconsin attorney Jerome Buting, have demanded that the Walworth County (Wisconsin) Fair reverse its initial rejection of booth renewal from “Peter’s Net,” a group promoting Catholic teaching and Catholic churches in Walworth County.

Thomas More Society claims that the fair’s rejection of the group is contrary to the fair’s standard policy for returning exhibitors and that it amounts to illegal discrimination against religious speech. The Peter’s Net booth promotes Catholic Church teaching through visuals and activities.

“The Walworth County Fair staff’s apparent discrimination against Peter’s Net’s religious display violates the Wisconsin Equal Rights Programs statute, which prohibits discrimination based on a person’s creed,” said Attorney Jerome Buting of Brookfield, WI, co-counsel with Thomas More Society, representing Peter’s Net.

“By silencing Peter’s Net’s religious speech, the fair is wielding the censor’s scissors out of anti-religious bias,” added Thomas Brejcha, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Society. “The First Amendment guarantee of free speech and the civil rights law guaranteeing religious liberty on the part of places of public accommodation alike compel the fair foundation to allow religious speech a full and equal voice.”

According to Paula Emmerth, executive director of Peter’s Net, her group hosted a booth at the 2013 Walworth County Fair, which Fair staff members affirmed to Ms. Emmerth did not violate any of the Fair’s probationary requirements for first time exhibitors. The Peter’s Net booth fully complied with the Fair Foundation’s own principles, “provid[ing] the citizens of our area with a wholesome and educational experience.” Nevertheless, at the close of the fair, two fair staff members informed Ms. Emmerth that the fair would not accept Peter’s Net’s deposit for a 2014 booth reservation. The staff gave vague reasons for the denial, which the Thomas More Society and Attorney Buting contend are pretextual, and really amount to unlawful discrimination against the group’s religious speech.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Legatus names FOT guest Erin Mersino “Defender of the Faith”

Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) attorney and Faith On Trial guest, Erin Mersino, has been given the “Defender of the Faith” award by Legatus, America’s largest organization of top Catholic business owners.  The award was presented to Mersino by John Hunt, the Legatus Executive Director, last Friday morning at the annual Legatus convention in Orlando, FL.

According to Hunt, recipients of the award have exhibited perseverance and a visible defense of the tenets of the Catholic Faith, many times at some personal risk. “We are deeply grateful to Erin for her service to Legatus, to the Church and to the constitution that we all hold dear.” said Hunt, as he presented her with the award.
The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) is a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. TMLC’s mission includes defending the religious liberty of Christians guaranteed by our Constitution.  Erin was chosen for the award, in part, for her prescient, creative and tireless work in defense of religious freedom and her service to those whose religious rights are under attack.

Erin’s defense of religious freedom includes her representation of 23 plaintiffs challenging the Obama Administration’s HHS Mandate, and her defense of Father Ray Leonard, the contract Naval Chaplain who was banned from celebrating Catholic Mass during the recent government shut-down and threatened with arrest if he volunteered to celebrate Mass or if he entered the chapel.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law, commented, “Erin is not just an outstanding and courageous attorney; her dedication and unyielding work ethic are what sets her apart. Her passion for these principles, religious freedom and the faith, makes her an undeniable force to be reckoned with.”


Friday, February 7, 2014

Christian pre-school excluded from state scrap tire program files appeal

State claimed religious daycare centers can’t participate,
then admits it has approved such centers on 15 other occasions


Attorneys for the Alliance Defending Freedom have appealed a ruling that held Missouri officials were within their rights to deny a Christian pre-school access to a state program because it was a religious school.
Trinity Lutheran Church Child Learning Center in Columbia sought a grant from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources Solid Waste Management Program to participate in the 2012 Playground Scrap Tire Surface Material Grant Program. The center wished to remove and replace a large portion of the pea gravel surfacing on its playgrounds with a safer, recycled, pour-in-place rubberized product.

Because the program has a limited amount of money to distribute, the department ranks the applications to determine which applicants will receive grants. Trinity Lutheran scored fifth out of 44 applicants, and the department provided grants to 14 projects in 2012. Nonetheless, the department disqualified Trinity Lutheran solely because it is operated by Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia.
Despite the fact that the department recently admitted that it allowed religious pre-schools to participate on at least 15 occasions, it continues to defend its denial of Trinity Lutheran’s application by pointing to a section of the state constitution that prohibits government funding of religion. ADF attorneys explain, however, that providing grant monies for the purpose of purchasing recycled tires for a playground is clearly not furthering religious purposes.

“That same section of the state constitution also states that ‘no preference shall be given to nor any discrimination made against any church, sect or creed of religion, or any form of religious faith or worship,’” said Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley. “The state cannot single out this pre-school for exclusion when it has allowed other religious daycare centers to participate in the program in the past.”

 

Thursday, February 6, 2014

President: Not even a “smidgen” of IRS corruption? Is he right? We'll discuss that next Tuesday on Faith On Trial

Last week, in response to a question from FOX News about how the IRS treats pro-life, pro-family and conservative organizations, President Obama told Bill O’Reilly that there was not
Sally Wagenmaker
a “smidgen” of corruption in the IRS.  Was he correct? Are conservative leaning and Christian groups being singled out?


The Thomas More Society says it is “shocked” that the president would deny IRS abuse, and it should know: it represents many of the groups that have been targeted [see earlier story]. Next Tuesday on Faith On Trial Chicago Attorney Sally Wagenmaker, special counsel with the Thomas More Society will be our guest and will discuss these issues.
Through her law office, Wagenmaker & Oberly, LLC, Sally provides legal counsel in corporate, tax, employment, and real estate matters for nonprofit, tax-exempt clients. She is president of the Northern Illinois Chapter of Christian Legal Society and a director of the national Christian Legal Society.

Join Deacon Mike Manno, co-host Gina Noll and Sally Tuesday morning at 9 (Central) on Iowa Catholic Radio, 1150 AM; 88.5 & 94.5 FM and streaming live on IowaCatholicRadio.com. The program will be re-broadcast at 9 p.m. and don’t forget to “like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter (@FaithOnTrial).

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Thomas More Society “shocked” that Obama would deny IRS corruption; refutes president’s statements citing client victims of IRS

After irrefutable evidence of corruption in the IRS, including harassment of pro-life organizations, why would Obama deny that corruption took place? 

President Obama told Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly that the recent IRS targeting scandal had “not even a smidgen of corruption.” The denial-laden interview on Sunday leaves the Thomas More Society shocked, as the President adamantly rejected the suggestion that the IRS was abusing groups not in concert with his administration. He claimed that IRS officials were confused about how to implement laws governing tax-exempt groups.  The Thomas More Society, however, a national public interest law firm based in Chicago, was heavily involved in providing Congress with evidence of specific wrongdoing on the part of Lois Lerner—disgraced former IRS director of the exempt organizations division—and her staff.

“Thomas More Society has defended six pro-life organizations whose First Amendment rights were trampled upon by the IRS because of the groups’ dedication to the sanctity of life,” said Peter Breen, vice president and senior counsel of the Thomas More Society. “In fact, in May and August of 2013, Thomas More Society produced two memos to the House Committee on Ways and Means, totaling over 500 pages of evidence that the IRS specifically targeted and harassed pro-life and conservative charities, illegally questioning their religious activities and withholding their tax exemptions. Frankly, we are shocked that President Obama would state that there was ‘not even a smidgeon of corruption’ involved in the IRS scandal. The Obama Administration must stop making excuses to cover up the IRS’ illegal activity and instead deal justly with the corruption and scandal that occurred.” The following links record the Thomas More Society exposure of the IRS pro-life discrimination scandal:
 

Monday, February 3, 2014

“IMPEACH OBAMA” T-shirts, American flag display deemed illegal by town; Federal lawsuit filed

The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, announced today that it has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Town of Campbell, Wisconsin’s ordinance which police are enforcing to prohibit citizens from displaying the American Flag and wearing t-Shirts which call for the impeachment of President Obama on the highway overpass managed by the Town. 

At issue is the enforcement of the Town of Campbell’s ordinance, 9.12, which prohibits the display of signs and flags on, or within 100 feet, of the only pedestrian overpass managed by the Town of Campbell. The Town enacted the ordinance on October 8, 2013 in response to some angry calls about the “Impeach Obama” expression on the t-shirts and the resulting media attention. 
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin on behalf of La Crosse residents Gregory Luce and Nicholas Newman against the Town of Campbell, its police chief, and one of his officers. Luce and Newman were participating in a nationwide movement called “Overpasses for America.”

Erin Mersino, a TMLC attorney and frequent guest on Faith on Trail, who is handling the case, said, “Viewpoint discrimination is one of the most harmful threats to our freedom of speech.  The answer to contempt of a certain viewpoint is not to silence that viewpoint, but to invite more speech and create a discourse.  That is one of the most fundamental tenets of our Republic.  The ordinance at issue turns the public sidewalk on the overpass, which is otherwise open to the public into a dead speech zone.”
The lawsuit claims that the Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights to freedom of speech and peaceful assembly have been violated and that the Ordinance is unconstitutional on its face and as applied by the police. Because the Plaintiffs wish to continue their constitutionally protected speech, they asked the Court to enter a Preliminary Injunction banning further enforcement of the ordinance during the pendency of the lawsuit.  

Gregory Luce is a Catholic who is pro-life and opposes President Obama for many reasons including the President’s actions in support of abortion.  On October 24, 2013, Luce along with a few of his supporters appeared on the pedestrian overpass wearing t-shirts that collectively spelled out “IMPEACH” on one side and “OBAMA” on the backside. A Town of Campbell police officer confronted Luce and his supporters and ordered them to leave or receive citations.  Luce and his supporters left as ordered.  This police action also thwarted a similarly planned demonstration by Luce on public land 100 feet from the overpass in question, which was also prohibited by the challenged ordinance.
Plaintiff Nicholas Newman is a patriotic American.  On October 27, 2013, Newman appeared on the overpass in question carrying an American Flag to express his pride for his country and the ideals on which it was founded.   Police issued Newman a citation for displaying the American Flag in violation of the ordinance, which carries a fine of $139.00.

The pedestrian overpass consists of only a sidewalk with a fence on either side.  Sidewalks are considered by the courts as traditional public forums.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “The Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that a bedrock principle of the First Amendment is that government cannot ban the expression of ideas just because some find it offensive.   In fact, the Supreme Court has allowed the burning of the American Flag on the grounds that it is matter of free expression.  So I’m astonished that the Town of Campbell and the police department think it can ban a citizen from displaying the American Flag.”


Thursday, January 30, 2014

Next Tuesday, Brad Dacus from Pacific Justice Institute on FOT: Middle school sex posters, gay therapy ban, and bible banned from school free time

Our old friend, Brad Dacus, founder and president of the Pacific Justice Institute, will be our guest next Tuesday on Faith On Trial.  Topics will include his reaction to a middle school sex poster (see story below); updates on the gay therapy ban litigation; and a case from
Brad Dacus
Michigan where an autistic boy was told he could not bring his bible to school to read in his free time, yet his sister is given a handout about wine helping dad make mom happy.


The Pacific Justice Institute has a network of attorneys who defend religious liberty and parental rights.  Brad can be heard weekly on “The Dacus Report” on radio stations across the country and has been a guest speaker on numerous radio and television programs and has appeared on America Live, CBS Evening News, CNN, Dateline NBC, Good Morning America, MSNBC, NBC News, News Talk TV, The Today Show, and many times on the O'Reilly Factor.
Join host Deacon Mike Manno along with his co-host Gina Noll Tuesday morning at 9 a.m. (Central) on Iowa Catholic Radio 1150 AM, 88.5 & 94.5 FM and streaming live on IowaCatholicRadio.com.  Re-broadcast at 9 p.m.

Don’t forget to “Like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter @FaithOnTrial.

Middle school sexual expressions poster under review

While middle school tends to be a time of discovery, one Kansas school took that discovery too far. Mark Ellis, the father of a student at Hocker Grove Middle School in Shawnee, was surprised to learn of a poster in his daughter's class that covered a variety of sexual acts.

"It upsets me," said Ellis. "You know this had to pass through enough hands that someone should have said, 'Wait a minute, these are 13-year-old kids, we do not need to be this in-depth with this sexual education type of program,'" he continued.


After this story hit the news, the Shawnee Mission School District Superintendent, Dr. Jim Hinson, told parents that the poster and curriculum it belonged to were placed under review. Another district official stated that the poster is part of curriculum that aligns with national standards and is in use by the rest of the district.

Pacific Justice Institute now represents Mr. Ellis in this matter. PJI sent a letter to the district requesting—under state and federal law—to allow him to review the curriculum and corresponding materials.

"We are here to protect the rights of both students and parents," said Brad Dacus, President of PJI and a frequent guest on Faith On Trial. "When it comes to sexuality, we can't control what kids talk about at school. But as parents we can control what the school teaches our children from an authoritative position. This material was both inappropriate and offensive."

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Democrats to Christians: we don’t care about your religious beliefs

Nineteen Democratic senators have filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court siding with President Obama against the craft chain Hobby Lobby.  The Christian owners of Hobby Lobby have sued the government over the Obama Administration’s HHS Mandate which requires them to provide birth control and abortion causing drugs free of charge to their employees.  Hobby Lobby claims that this is against its owners’ religious beliefs. The case is now pending before the U. S. Supreme Court.

The senators who believe that the government can trump conscience rights are: The other senators who signed the brief are: Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Barbara Mikulsi (D-Md.), Patty Murry (D-Wash.), Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.), Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

Monday, January 27, 2014

This week on Faith on Trial: End of life issues with Tom Moreland

Tom Moreland, founder and CEO of St. Jude Hospice will be our guest to discuss recent end of life issues that have been in the courts recently.  Tom utilizes the ethical directives of the Catholic Church to ensure that all have dignity and a place to be cared for until God calls them home.   

Tom Moreland
He currently is pursuing his Master of Theology with a concentration in bioethics from Holy Apostles Seminary. He is certified in Catholic bioethics by the National Catholic Bioethics Center and as a Higher Ground Leadership Pathfinder. Tom is a Knight of Magisterial Grace and Regional Hospitaller with the Order of Malta, a Catholic religious order dedicated to defending the faith and serving the poor and the sick around the world. He is a member of Legatus, cofounder of the Des Moines Catholic Medical Association Guild, Knight of Columbus, Board member for Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Des Moines and a member of the Bishops Council. He is currently serving on the National Association of Homecare & Hospice Board of Directors as a representative for region seven, which includes Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas and Missouri, and is a member of the board's executive committee.
Join Deacon Mike Manno and co-host Gina Noll Tuesday morning at 9 (Central) on Iowa Catholic Radio 1150 AM, 88.5 & 94.5 FM and streaming live on IowaCatholicRadio.com for a discussion of recent end of life cases as well as other legal news of interest to men and women of faith. Don’t forget to “Like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter (@FaithOnTrial).

Friday, January 24, 2014

Supreme Court sides with Little Sisters over Big Brother

The Little Sisters of the Poor today (Friday) received an injunction from the Supreme Court protecting them from the controversial HHS mandate while their case is before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The injunction means that the Little Sisters will not be forced to sign and deliver the controversial government forms authorizing and instructing their benefits administrator to provide contraceptives, sterilization, and drugs and devices that may cause early abortions. The Court’s order also provides protection to more than 400 other Catholic organizations that receive health benefits through the same Catholic benefits provider, Christian Brothers.

“We are delighted that the Supreme Court has issued this order protecting the Little Sisters,” said Mark Rienzi, Senior Counsel for the Becket Fund “The government has lots of ways to deliver contraceptives to people–it doesn’t need to force nuns to participate.”

To receive protection, the Supreme Court said that the Little Sisters and other organizations that receive benefits through Christian Brothers must simply inform HHS of their religious identity and objections. The Court said that the Little Sisters did not have to sign or deliver the controversial government forms that authorize and direct their benefits administrator to provide the objectionable drugs and devices.

The order was issued by the entire Supreme Court. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who is the Justice assigned for emergency applications from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, had previously issued a temporary injunction to allow the court time to consider the Little Sisters’ emergency appeal, filed on New Years’ Eve.

Prior to the order, injunctions had been awarded in 18 of the 19 similar cases in which relief had been requested.

“Virtually every other party who asked for protection from the mandate has been given it,” said Rienzi.  “It made no sense for the Little Sisters to be singled out for fines and punishment before they could even finish their suit.”

The Little Sisters are joined in the lawsuit by religious health benefit providers, Christian Brothers Services, Christian Brothers Employee Benefits Trust.  The lawsuit is a class action on behalf of all the non-exempt organizations that receive benefits through Christian Brothers. The Plaintiffs are also represented by Locke Lord, a national law firm, and by Kevin Walsh, a law professor at the University of Richmond.

To date, there are currently 91 lawsuits challenging the unconstitutional HHS mandate.

Priests for Life's challenge to the Obamacare HHS Mandate heads to Supreme Court

Yesterday, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) filed a “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” in the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court to grant review of its case challenging the Obamacare HHS mandate on behalf of Priests for Life, a nonprofit, Catholic organization; Father Frank Pavone, the National Director of Priests for Life; Dr. Alveda King, the niece of
Fr. Frank Pavone
civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Pastoral Associate and Director of African-American Outreach for Priests for Life; and Janet Morana, the Executive Director of Priests for Life. 


The HHS Mandate requires employers, such as Priests for Life, to provide free contraception and abortion producing drugs to its employees. The petition specifically asks the Court to decide whether the challenged mandate as applied against non-exempt, nonprofit religious employers violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
On December 19, Federal Judge Emmett G. Sullivan, sitting in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, upheld the government’s enforcement of the mandate as applied against Priests for Life.  Within an hour, AFLC filed an immediate appeal of the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and within 24 hours, filed an emergency motion asking the court to halt the mandate pending appeal.  On December 31, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit granted the injunction.

Robert Muise
AFLC is now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case pursuant to a special Supreme Court rule, which allows review of a case pending in a U.S. appellate court before judgment is entered in that court if “the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.”
Robert Muise, Co-Founder and Senior Counsel of AFLC, and a former guest on Faith on Trial, commented: “There is little doubt that the question of whether Obama’s unconscionable mandate violates the free exercise rights of religious organizations is not only important to Priests for Life, but to all freedom-loving Americans.  Consequently, it is imperative and of great public importance that the Court grant review of this case and promptly resolve this question, which ultimately affects the religious freedom of all private citizens.”

David Yerushalmi, Co-Founder and Senior Counsel of AFLC, commented: “It is evident that the Obama administration has little regard for the religious beliefs of Catholic organizations like Priests for Life and even less regard for our Constitution and the rule of law.  Consequently, it is imperative that the Supreme Court grant review of this case and immediately halt this administration’s assault on our Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees all American citizens.”

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Planned Parenthood laying off in Iowa, closing clinics in secret; Quietly abandons surgical abortions in Bettendorf and Sioux City

Iowa Right to Life has discovered that Planned Parenthood of the Heartland has quietly laid off all but one employee (a center manager) at their Creston and Red Oak, Iowa locations.  In addition, Iowa's largest abortion provider has halted surgical abortions at its Bettendorf and Sioux City abortion centers.

This is not the first time PPH has tried to keep closings and layoffs quiet.  Last November, IRTL alerted the media that PPH was closing centers in Ankeny, Fort Dodge, Mount Pleasant and Washington, after hearing of massive layoffs at those locations on Veteran's Day (11/11/13), as well as cuts in key staff at PPH's headquarters in Des Moines.  IRTL also forced PPH to come clean in December, when it discovered the hours at the Creston and Red Oak centers were reduced to zero.
Iowa Life to Right Executive Director, Jenifer Bowen, says PPH's covert changes and layoffs should surprise no one.  "Planned Parenthood does not want the public to know they are closing clinics," said Bowen, "so they can continue to collect millions from donors and Iowa taxpayers, while providing zero services."

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland's most recent Annual Report for Fiscal year ending in June 2013 shows the organization made a profit of $740,241 last year, before their Veterans Day layoffs.  In addition:
* PPH's Taxpayer-funded Grants were up to $3,303,171 in 2013 from $2,673,281 in 2012.

* PPH's Investments Income jumped to $969,721 in 2013 from $264,068 in 2012.
* PPH's Patient Services Revenue leaped to $17,219,377 in 2013 from $13,890,520 in 2012 (PPH talks about serving the poor, while collecting millions from patients.)

* PPH's Public Donations jumped to $10,784,476 in 2013 from $6,974,442 in 2012.
* PPH also received $214,427 from the Department of Health and Human Services in August 2013 to hire and train Navigators to sign people up for Obamacare.

PPH sent out an email soliciting donations on 1/8/14 with no mention of the layoffs in Creston and Red Oak or that they were abandoning surgical abortions in Bettendorf and Sioux City.  Both Bettendorf and Sioux City still perform the more dangerous medication abortions, which are more profitable for PPH.
Where did the money go?

PPH's downward spiral since 2012 is curious, as PPH President Jill June had just announced in April 2011 that the abortion giant would open new locations in Carter Lake, Clinton, Marshalltown, Mason City, Muscatine and Ottumwa and that $7 million had already been raised in PPH's $11.5 million capital campaign toward that goal.  None of those locations ever materialized.
When PPH officially announces the closing of its Creston and Red Oak locations, that will mean six of PPH's controversial medication abortions by webcam locations will have closed and six more "abortion referral" will have closed sites since 2012.

"The next question is, 'What happened to all the webcam equipment and the high-tech ultrasound machines from the closed webcam abortion facilities?'" said Bowen.  "The IRS should be investigating Planned Parenthood of the Heartland instead of bullying grassroots pro-lifers."
The closings and layoffs did not seem to hurt PPH's abortion business.  PPH's Annual Report showed their abortions up to 6,367 in 2013 vs. 5,832 in 2012.  (Now an average of 17.4 abortions every day.)  Without Creston and Red Oak, Planned Parenthood of the Heartland will still have 15 locations in Iowa, including its headquarters in Des Moines.  12 of those locations perform abortions.