BOISE, ID – Liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit on behalf of an Idaho Army National Guard infantry officer against Governor Brad Little and two army generals for unlawfully removing the officer from command solely due to his personal Christian expression on biblical sexuality made outside of the military environment. An investigation into the officer, which revealed no wrongdoing, nevertheless recommended a policy to monitor potential candidates for command for any “concerning ideologies” as a way of “rooting out” any “extremism” in the ranks. In this case, the decision to remove him from command on this basis shows that his superiors believe his Bible-centered beliefs on sexuality to be concerning and essentially puts an unconstitutional “No Christians in Command” policy into action.
The investigation noted that the Idaho Army
National Guard should consider “creating a policy…of conducting public records
search on the Internet and on popular social media sites to see how a selected
candidate portrays themselves publicly,” and that candidates for command be
“scrutinized to ensure there is no concerning information within the public
domain.”
In the lawsuit, Liberty Counsel contends that
despite finding no evidence of wrongdoing by the officer, the Idaho Army
National Guard affirmed the investigation’s policy recommendation by ordering
the officer removed from command “for the mere exercise and expression of his
religious views.”
These discriminatory actions violate the First
Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the
Idaho Free Exercise of Religious Protection Act. Liberty Counsel seeks a
permanent injunction against the discrimination of Christians in the Idaho Army
National Guard and a temporary restraining order for it to restore the officer
and cease all efforts to force him out of the military.
In addition to Gov. Little, the lawsuit names
Adjutant General of the Idaho National Guard Major General Timothy J. Donnellan
and the Assistant Adjutant General for the Idaho Army National Guard Brigadier
General James C. Packwood.
The events that led to this unjustifiable
policy began when Major David Worley, an infantry officer, ran for mayor in
Pocatello, Idaho. During Worley’s political campaign, which he conducted
strictly outside his military duties, he expressed his religious convictions
and moral objections to certain issues relevant to political discourse in his
community. He expressed his opposition to issues involving so-called “Drag
Queen Story Hours,” pornographic material for minors in public libraries, and
the medical mutilation of gender-confused children. All of Worley’s protected
speech occurred off-duty in his private capacity and before he took command of
the Idaho Army National Guard’s Recruiting and Retention unit.
In 2023, a subordinate senior enlisted man
under Worley’s command, who claims to be homosexual and is ideologically
opposed to Worley’s religious beliefs, filed a formal discrimination complaint
against Worley. Despite only meeting Worley twice without incident, the
complaining guardsman alleged he was discriminated against because of his
sexual orientation and that Worley created a hostile work environment. The
complaining guardsman noted he felt “threatened and unsafe” merely due to
Worley’s beliefs.
However, Worley’s Christian beliefs denote that
all people are made in God’s image and have inherent dignity and are worthy of
respect. He is committed to serving those under his command, regardless of
political or religious disagreements, and would give his life in defense of his
state and nation. As a result, the Idaho Army National Guard suspended Worley
from command in July 2023 following the complaint and then illegally pressured
him to resign without benefit of any counsel or notice. He rescinded his notice
two hours later after contacting Liberty Counsel.
The Idaho Army National Guard then proceeded
with a formal investigation into the complaint. Ultimately, General Packwood
found the complaints from the complaining guardsman were unsubstantiated and
found no evidence Worley did anything wrong in the workplace. Yet, out of the
investigation came the recommendation that all candidates for command be
scrutinized to ensure any concerning expression is discovered, reported to the
Department of Defense, and investigated for extremist activity. Accordingly, General
Packwood concluded Worley’s religious beliefs were “toxic” and removed him from
command solely due to those protected religious views.
“The ‘No Christians in Command’ policy
constitutes a religious gerrymander by unconstitutionally orphaning sincerely
held religious beliefs while permitting the more favored nonreligious value
systems,” wrote Liberty Counsel. “On its face and as applied, [the policy]
lacks any rational basis and is irrational and unjustifiable.”
Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver
said, “The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that military members do not shed
their constitutional rights when they step forward to serve the nation. Nor are
the military departments immune to the laws protecting their individual
freedoms. By suspending and removing Major David Worley from command over his
Christian beliefs, the Idaho Army National Guard informally adopted an
unconstitutional ‘No Christians in Command’ policy. The Constitution simply
does not allow the military to punish those with sincerely held religious
beliefs or to specifically target religion for disparate and discriminatory
treatment. Governor Brad Little must ensure that the Idaho Army National Guard
upholds federal and state law and protects the free speech of its service
members. This discrimination against Major Worley must stop and his record must
be cleared and his career restored.”
No comments:
Post a Comment