The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) has published the results of a comprehensive survey of over 37,000 students at over 150 colleges and universities; the survey was taken in 2021. [The 2022-2023 survey results were subsequently released.]
The
subject of the survey is the extent to which freedom of speech is honored on
college campuses. The findings are not sanguine, and this is particularly true
of Jesuit-run schools.
The
overall state of free speech on campus is not good. Here are a few examples
found in the survey.
- More than 80% of
students reported self-censoring their viewpoints at their colleges at
least some of the time.
- More than 50% of
students identified racial inequality as a difficult topic to discuss on
their campus.
- Two-thirds of students
(66%) say it is acceptable to shout down a speaker to prevent them from
speaking on campus.
- Almost one in four
(23%) say it is acceptable to use violence to stop campus speech.
As
I’ve long said, there is more free speech allowed at your local pub than there
is at your local college campus. This proves it. Moreover, whatever
happened to the “peace loving” reputation of college kids—almost one in four
say it’s okay to violently attack someone who says something disagreeable.
Marxism
in practice, of course, has a long trail of bloodshed, and it is Marxism, in
its cultural iteration, that is popular on college campuses these days. It’s
not hard to connect the dots.
Of
the 154 colleges listed in FIRE’s 2021 Campus Free Speech Rankings, the five
schools with the best free speech rating, are, from top to bottom:
Claremont
McKenna
University
of Chicago
University
of New Hampshire
Emory
University
Florida
State University
The
five worst, beginning with the worst, are:
DePauw
University
Marquette
University
Louisiana
State University
Boston College
Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute
FIRE
awarded Rensselear Polytechnic its lifetime censorship award.
It
may surprise some to learn that sixteen of the twenty schools that scored the
lowest are private institutions, while sixteen of the twenty highest free
speech institutions are public institutions.
Some
other surprises include schools like the University of Mississippi weighing in
at #11, while Harvard was near the bottom at #130; Princeton was #135.
Most
people would expect the results to be the opposite, given the prestige of Harvard
and Princeton. Maybe the Ivies would benefit by hiring faculty such as
University of Mississippi law professor Ronald Rychlak (he is a member of our
board of advisors): he co-founded and chaired The Declaration of Independence
Center for Study of American Freedom at Ole Miss. Maybe they can hire him so he
can “reeducate” the professoriate.
Regarding
Catholic institutions, none were in the top twenty. In fact, none were in the
top one hundred. But there were three among the worst: Fordham was tenth from
the bottom (#145); Boston College was fourth from the bottom (#151) and
Marquette was second to last (#153). All three are Jesuit-run institutions.
While
Fordham is a disgrace, it is clear from reading the report that Boston College
and Marquette are much worse. Free speech is so under fire at Marquette that
the FIRE gave it special mention.
“For
two years running—in 2015 and 2016 (for the years 2014 and 2015)—FIRE named
Marquette one of the ten worst colleges for free speech because of its attempts
to revoke the tenure of Professor John McAdams and then terminate him. It took
more than three years, but McAdams ultimately won his lawsuit against the
university and was reinstated to his faculty position in the fall of 2018.”
What
did McAdams do that made a faculty panel recommend sanctions against him? He
complained when a graduate instructor tried to muzzle the free speech of a
conservative student. In November 2014, McAdams criticized Cheryl Abbate for
telling a student she would no longer tolerate his position objecting to gay
marriage in her ethics class. McAdams was subsequently fired. He sued.
In
July 2018, Marquette said it would comply with a court order from the Wisconsin
Supreme Court to reinstate McAdams. Abbate was not just a graduate student—she
was paid as an instructor by the university.
It
was the free speech of McAdams that was endangered, not Abbate’s. Indeed, she
was the one who was guilty of stifling free speech, and by a student who
defended the Church’s teachings on marriage at a supposedly Catholic
university!
Previously,
in 2014, the Catholic League criticized Marquette for telling employees at an
“anti-harassment” training presentation that merely voicing objections to gay
marriage may be considered discriminatory; they were urged to report such
offenses. At that time, I raised the following question. “Would they bring the
pope up on charges following a speech on marriage?”
What’s
going on at these Jesuit schools? Why are they breeding such intolerance? The
time has come for those who run Fordham, Boston College and Marquette to have a
campus-wide forum on the root causes of Jesuit intolerance for freedom of
speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment