In Doster v. Kendall, (6th
Cir., Sept. 9, 2022), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to grant an
emergency stay of a class-wide injunction that was issued by an Ohio federal
district court in a suit by Air Force and Space Force members who object on
religious grounds to receiving the COVID vaccine. The district
court enjoined the military from taking enforcement measures, while
litigation is pending, against service members who have submitted confirmed
requests for a religious accommodation from the military's vaccine mandate. The
6th Circuit said in part:
[T]he Department challenges only the merits of the district
court’s decision to certify the class—the Department’s position being that,
even if the named plaintiffs are likely to prevail on their individual claims,
the court’s certification of the class was an abuse of discretion, and thus so
too was the court’s issuance of a class-wide preliminary injunction....
The Department ... argues that RFRA claims categorically
cannot be certified for class treatment. Here, for example, it says that the
plaintiffs’ RFRA claim requires the court to determine separately for each
service member whether the vaccination mandate is the least restrictive means
of furthering a compelling governmental interest. We agree that most RFRA
claims require that kind of individualized analysis; and we have no quarrel
with the Department’s contention that such an analysis could not be conducted class-wide
here. But the Department’s argument misconceives the nature of the RFRA claim
that the district court certified. The court’s order emphasized on almost every
page that the RFRA claim it certified was one based on a class-wide “clear
policy of discrimination against religious accommodation requests.” ... That
claim ... does not turn on an analysis of the class members’ individual
circumstances and likely can be adjudicated class-wide.
No comments:
Post a Comment