In the wake of the FDA giving full approval to a not-yet-on-the-market COVID injection
named Comirnaty on August 23, the floodgates of “vaccine” mandates nationwide have been opened. From private enterprise to educational institutions and even the military, the message is clear: Take the jab or lose your job. Or your enrollment. Or your honorable discharge. States, including New York and Colorado, are requiring all health care workers to be vaccinated stat, with no exceptions, medical or religious. But for critical thinkers, the most obvious exception is being unilaterally ignored—people who possess active natural antibodies, having already recovered from the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Let’s review what’s really going on with literally millions of people
worldwide: Person A gets infected with SARS-CoV-2. Person A’s body elicits an
immune response that attacks the foreign antigen and disables it by creating
virus-neutralizing antibodies, enabling the person to recover. Person A now
harbors antibodies that protect the body in case of future attack. These
antibodies, by definition, are “any of numerous Y-shaped protein molecules
produced by B cells as a primary immune defense, each molecule and its clones
having a unique binding site that can combine with the complementary site of a
foreign antigen, as on a virus or bacterium, thereby disabling the antigen and
signaling other immune defenses.” Now-healthy-again Person A goes back out into
the world only to be bombarded with widespread and subliminal messaging,
including that of Anthony Fauci, purporting that his newly generated antibodies
are somehow inferior, insufficient, incompetent or even unable to defend him
against future encounters with the virus and/or one of its future
variants. Put your mask back on. Get the jab anyway. This is gaslighting
at its finest!
No doubt many scientists wish they could ignore a large Israeli study that indicates that “newly-released data show
people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than
never-infected, vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or
become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.” The study goes so far as to
question the validity of the injections against the Delta variant given
that the vaccinated were 13x more likely to be infected than those who naturally
recovered from the infection, and 27x more likely to be symptomatic.
According to another published scientific study evaluating 254 COVID-19 patients up to
eight months, cumulative results “suggest that broad and effective immunity may
persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients.” And the proof doesn’t stop
there. In fact, there are over 15 studies—including New York University, The University of
California, Emory University and Cornell, among others—all coming to the same
conclusion: Natural immunity from prior infection is more robust than the
immunity generated from the COVID injections.
So, as of Sept. 1, 2021, where does this leave the almost 196
million recovered cases worldwide or the over 31
million antibody-touting Americans in the United States alone?
Why is this science being ignored even as millions of recovered Americans are
being coerced into taking the shot even though antibodies are present? It goes
without saying, given the relatively new nature of fully understanding the
virus and its effects, that more research needs to be completed. It is
imperative that decision-makers gather more verifiable information before
unequivocally mandating a knee-jerk, one-size-fits-all supposed remedy that
even now has been proven to wane over time and has become downright dangerous to
many people. The presence of
long-lasting robust antibodies in millions of recovered COVID patients
worldwide is reason enough to pause and reevaluate the necessity of forced
vaccinations.
Liberty Counsel advances religious
liberty, the sanctity of human life and the family through litigation and
education. We depend on your support, which enables us to represent people at
no cost. Click here to
give.
No comments:
Post a Comment