By Catholic League president Bill Donohue
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that Catholic foster
care agencies can reject gay couples from adopting children. This is a huge
victory for religious liberty and a resounding defeat for LGBTQ activists.
It was these activists who launched a contrived assault on
the rights of Catholic social service agencies—no gay or transgender couple had
ever complained that they were discriminated against by these Catholic
entities—and now their effort to impose their secular beliefs on Catholics has
been rejected.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the six members who
joined his majority opinion (others offered their own opinions), noted that the
Catholic agency named in the lawsuit only sought "an accommodation that
will allow it to continue serving the children of Philadelphia in a manner
consistent with its religious beliefs; it does not seek to impose those
beliefs on anyone else (my italics)."
The First Amendment guarantees religious liberty, and that
provision means little if it only means the right to worship. The right to
freely exercise one's religious beliefs in the public square is central to
religious liberty, and while that right—like all other constitutional rights—is
not absolute, it must be seen as presumptively constitutional.
This decision makes it more difficult for LGBTQ activists
to argue that sexual orientation and sexual identity are analogous to race.
They are not. Race is an ascribed characteristic, and as such it is an amoral
attribute. Sexual orientation (at least when it is behaviorally operative) and
sexual identity are achieved, and to that extent they are normative, thereby
making them legitimate categories for moral judgment.
We await all the anti-Catholic bigots who will maintain
that we have too many Catholics on the Supreme Court. Hope they notice that two
Jews and one Protestant were on the same side as the Catholic justices.
No comments:
Post a Comment