By Catholic League president Bill Donohue
Left-wing advocacy organizations are wasting no time
pressing Joe Biden to do away with the religious liberty protections afforded
by the Trump administration. As we have previously detailed, no president has done more to secure religious
liberty than Donald Trump.
The three most prominent organizations asking Biden to undo
Trump's progress are the American Civil Liberties Union, the Human Rights
Campaign, and the Center for American Progress.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is obsessed with
sex: it wants to make sure that homosexuals, the sexually confused (transgender
people), and women seeking an abortion never have rights that are subordinate
to religious rights. It does not matter to the civil libertarians that the
former are nowhere mentioned in the Constitution and the latter are enshrined
in the First Amendment. The ACLU is worried that "a new wave of bills
seeking to create religious exemptions" will succeed, endangering the
rights of "LGBTQ" people.
No right is more important than conscience rights, a
liberty which is ineluctably tied to religious rights. It is this premier right
that the ACLU loathes. In a statement released after the election, it condemned
"attempts by the Trump administration to invoke religious or personal
beliefs." It said that such exercises can be used to discriminate against
LGBTQ people. It further stated that "invoking religious or moral
objections" to the LGBTQ agenda cannot be tolerated.
On November 11, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) issued its
"Blueprint for Positive Change 2020." It is chock-a-block full of
recommendations for Biden. One of its priorities is to upend the new direction
taken by the Office of Civil Rights within the Department of Health and Human
Services under President Trump. It specifically takes aim at the Office's
enforcement of "federal conscience and religious liberty laws." Once
again, the LGBTQ agenda is considered to be more important. Thus HRC joins the
ACLU in the left-wing assault on conscience rights.
HRC also wants to pare back the religious liberty
protections afforded faith-based programs by the Trump administration. If its
position were followed, it would essentially excise the faith element in
faith-based initiatives. This, of course, is its goal.
The most draconian recommendation promoted by HRC is its
call for the Department of Education to reconsider its standards for
accrediting religious institutions of higher education. In short, it wants to
deny accreditation to religious colleges and universities that do not meet its
secular vision of education.
HRC is incensed over the current mandate that accreditation
agencies "respect the stated mission" of these religious institutions.
It takes particular umbrage at the religious liberty protections cited in the
Higher Education Opportunity Act, a law passed by the Congress during the
outgoing Bush administration in 2008.
The Center for American Progress (CAP) encourages the Biden
Administration to do everything the ACLU and HRC want, focusing on doing away
with religious exemptions initiated by the Trump administration. However, it
does have a few novel ideas of its own.
CAP is big on "diversity outreach" efforts to
minority religions. This multicultural game, of course, is less interested in
recognizing minority religions than it is in whittling away at our
Judeo-Christian heritage. It does not stop there.
"Religious outreach efforts should also specifically
include secular humanist or nonreligious groups, as well as faith-based or
spirit-rooted communities who do not observe a specific religious
tradition." If the gurus who wrote this were honest, they would simply say
that religious outreach efforts should embrace organizations founded to subvert
religion. Inviting atheists to have a table at religious gatherings is like
having racists participate in a forum on racism. Yes, there are non-bigoted
atheists, but organized atheist entities invariably harbor an animus against religion.
CAP urges the Biden administration to "safeguard the
separation between religion and government." Really? Then why does it say,
"Together with Pope Francis, the Biden administration should organize a
global gathering of religious leaders to discuss climate change and refugee
issues"?
Whatever happened to that proverbial "wall"
separating church and state? No matter, if the pope is to have a voice on
climate change (not exactly his specialty), why not invite the Holy Father to
share his views on gender ideology—the fanciful notion that we can switch our
sex? He properly calls it "demonic."
Constitutional law professor Patrick Garry notes that it
was never the intent of the Founders to "place religion and nonreligion on
the same level." In fact, "Textually, the Constitution provides
greater protection of religious practices than for any secular-belief-related
activities." This is what gnaws at the ACLU, HRC and CAP.
Much is being made of Biden's alleged "devout"
Catholic status. Yet many of his polices on life, marriage, the family, and
sexuality are at variance with the teachings of the Catholic Church. Now he is
being besieged by organizations that are positively inimical to his professed
religion. He cannot have it both ways any more. It is time for him to draw a
line in the sand, before his allies eviscerate it altogether.
No comments:
Post a Comment