In Petro
v. Grewal, (NJ Super., April 1, 2020), a New Jersey state trial
court dismissed a suit challenging the constitutionality of New Jersey's Medical Aid in
Dying for the Terminally Ill Act. Plaintiffs challenged the law on
numerous grounds, including under the free exercise clause. First the court
held that plaintiffs lack standing to challenge the law, saying in part:
"Their deeply felt religious, ethical or professional
objections to the Act do not suffice to establish standing, even under New
Jersey's liberal standard."
The court however went on to also reject plaintiffs' claims
on the merits. In part of its opinion, the court rejected plaintiffs' free
exercise objections to the obligation of a doctor who refuses to provide aid in
dying to transfer health care records to a patient's new doctor. The court said
that the law is a neutral law of general applicability, and that the obligation
to transfer records is "minimally burdensome."
No comments:
Post a Comment