WASHINGTON, D.C. – A federal appeals court
rejected a one-man crusade to eliminate the long-standing tradition of
allowing county commissioners to open their meetings in prayer. In Bormuth v. County of
Jackson, the court rejected pagan activist Peter Bormuth’s lawsuit against the
county of Jackson, Michigan, addressing an important church-state issue that
will likely set up the need for Supreme Court review because of its conflict
with another recent ruling.
In 2014, the U.S.
Supreme Court unanimously protected legislative prayer in its Town of Greece v. Galloway decision, which required courts to consult history
to interpret the Constitution’s Establishment Clause. Yet Bormuth attempted
to dodge that ruling by using the discredited Lemon test to end the county’s prayer practice. The ruling
by the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati
directly disagrees with a very similar case, Lund v. Rowan County, in the Fourth Circuit in North Carolina.
“The Court was right to look to
our nation’s history—and not the archaic Lemon test—to interpret the
Establishment Clause” said Daniel Blomberg, counsel at the non-profit,
religious liberty law firm Becket. “And the court’s strong disagreement
with a very similar case just decided in the Fourth Circuit means that the
Supreme Court will soon have the chance to provide much-needed clarity in
this area of the law.”
Legislators have opened meetings
in prayer since before the founding of the country, and no one considered it
to be an establishment of religion. As Becket explained in the friend-of-the-court brief
that it filed with Stanford Law School Professor Michael McConnell, the
Founders understood an establishment of religion to be government control of
the church or government attempts to force people into or out of a church.
Yet the
Lemon Test, named after the 1971 Lemon v. Kurtzman case, ignores history and encourages
anti-religious activists to file lawsuits against religious expression,
including monuments to fallen soldiers and the national motto “In God We
Trust” in U.S. currency. Town of Greece and yesterday’s Bormuth
decision are important steps to ensuring that the Establishment Clause is
interpreted in the same way the rest of the Constitution is: by analyzing it
through its historical context.
“Small-town officials and weary
judges shouldn’t be held hostage to activists determined to fight over
anything that hints at religion in public life. Today’s ruling helps both
reconnect the First Amendment with its historical roots and prevent future
divisive church-state lawsuits,” said Blomberg.
|
Faith on Trial is where we examine the influence of law and society on people of faith. Here we will look at those cases and events that impinge on the rights of people to fully practice their faith. Faith on Trial is heard every Saturday at 2 p.m. and Sunday at 9 p.m. on the Iowa Catholic Radio Network and anytime on our podcast at : https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/.
Thursday, September 7, 2017
Court protects small-town prayer from pagan activist
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment