In this lawsuit, the American Freedom Law Center (“AFLC”) sued SUNY-Buffalo officials on behalf of the Center for
Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc., a national pro-life group, and its student sponsors
for permitting an unruly mob of pro-abortion protestors to purposely disrupt a
peaceful, pro-life demonstration on the university’s campus. The case is
captioned Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Black.
This order requires the “State University of
New York” to “not engage in discriminatory enforcement of its regulations
against Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc., and UB Students For Life” and to
“take all reasonable measures to enforce its policies against deliberately
disrupting or preventing the freedom of any person to express his or her
views.” The order also requires the State of New York to pay AFLC $30,000
in attorneys’ fees.
The order came as the result of a prior
favorable ruling in which the judge denied the motion to dismiss filed by the
SUNY-Buffalo officials, who argued that the lawsuit failed to state a
constitutional violation.
In that important First Amendment ruling, the
judge held as follows:
CBR’s “exhibition was unquestionably subject
to First Amendment protection,” that “when the University defendants allowed
counter-demonstrators to use signs, umbrellas, and bed sheets to block the
photo-murals from view,” these facts were “sufficient to allege that the
defendants took adverse actions against plaintiffs,” and “that the protected
speech was at least a ‘substantial’ or ‘motivating’ factor in defendants’
alleged discriminatory and retaliatory acts.” To that end, the court
found “the specific allegations of plaintiffs of statements and circumstances
tending to show the defendants were hostile to the content and viewpoint of
plaintiffs’ photo-murals, and plaintiffs’ insistence on exercising their rights
to freedom of speech, are legally sufficient.”
Robert Muise, AFLC Co-Founder and Senior
Counsel, commented:
"This is an important case which establishes
the principle that public university officials cannot stand idly by as
protesters seek to disrupt the free speech rights of other students and groups
on their campuses. Indeed, we’ve accomplished every goal we pursued in
this litigation: we established an important First Amendment principle of law
and we ensured that our clients’ speech is fully protected by this
constitutional safeguard. And on top of that, the State of New York is
paying us $30,000 in attorneys’ fees. Victory is complete."
No comments:
Post a Comment