Data from a recently released poll show increasing despair among Gen-Z voters over the current political climate in the U.S., with the vast majority expressing the belief that almost all politicians are corrupt. The poll found that 64% of voters ages 18 to 30 agreed with the statement “America is in decline.” READ
Faith on Trial is where we examine the influence of law and society on people of faith. Here we will look at those cases and events that impinge on the rights of people to fully practice their faith. Faith on Trial is heard every Saturday at 2 p.m. and Sunday at 9 p.m. on the Iowa Catholic Radio Network and anytime on our podcast at : https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/.
Friday, May 31, 2024
Political leaders should bolster the family
“Gallup surveys reveal that at least half of women with children prefer to stay home — and supermajorities prefer at least the option to stay home,” write Steve Cortes and CatholicVote’s Brian Burch. It’s time America’s political leaders responded to the needs of American families. READ
Many ‘pride’ events took place on military bases
According to documents newly obtained via a Freedom of Access to Information (FOIA) request from CatholicVote and Judicial Watch, U.S. Air Force bases have recently hosted numerous pro-LGBTQ “Pride” events geared toward children. It appears several such events have taken place since the Biden Department of Defense last year stated it would no longer allow drag shows on military bases. READ
Wednesday, May 29, 2024
Iowa drops hate crime charge against ‘Satan slayer’
Iowa reportedly dropped a “hate crime” charge against Michael Cassidy, the Christian veteran who destroyed a Satanic statue in the state capital last December. Cassidy’s attorney Sara Pasquale said she is “hopeful that this case will bring awareness to similar situations throughout the country.” READ
Most British voters want immigration freeze
A recent survey found that most of the British public wants to end mass immigration. When asked if “Britain should have a five-year freeze on all further immigration that is not essential to supporting the NHS,” 32% of respondents strongly agreed, 17% tended to agree, 13% tended to disagree, and only 11% strongly disagreed. READ
NY Attorney General Letitia James Loses First Round in Legal Battle Against Pregnancy Help Organizations
Update: New York Court Orders Lawsuits Remain in Rochester, Rejecting State’s Attempt to Shift Cases to Manhattan
New York Supreme Court Justice Sam Valleriani issued the consolidation order on
May 24, 2024. This combines a lawsuit brought by James against pregnancy help
organizations in Manhattan, New York, with the previously filed case brought by
the organizations in Rochester’s Monroe County Court. James had tried to
relocate the lawsuit against her from its Rochester venue to New York County
Court in Manhattan, hundreds of miles aways.
Peter Breen, Thomas More Society Executive
Vice President & Head of Litigation:
“For the
past month, Letitia James’ has tried to illegally frighten and harass New
York’s pregnancy help organizations into silence, threatening them with
lawsuits if they keep speaking their truthful message about Abortion Pill
Reversal. We brought suit in Rochester, near to where most of the organizations
are headquartered and work. Instead of agreeing to a convenient venue, James
then sued these charitable organizations in Manhattan, despite the fact that
not a single one of the organizations is located there. We are pleased that the
Court in Monroe County agreed that the cases should be consolidated together
and heard in Rochester, the ‘most fair, appropriate and logistically convenient
venue,’ and not in Manhattan, which has no connection to the case. We look
forward to defending Heartbeat International, CompassCare, and all of New
York’s pregnancy help organizations targeted by James’ unconstitutional
witch-hunt. New Yorkers deserve to know that Abortion Pill Reversal is not just
possible but safe and effective, and our clients have the right to share that truth with women who are
undergoing a chemical abortion that they do not want to continue.”
Thomas More Society attorneys
filed suit on April 30, 2024, against James in Monroe County, on behalf of
Heartbeat International and a group of New York pregnancy help organizations.
On May 6, 2024, James filed a lawsuit against the same organizations, in New
York County, which covers Manhattan.
Read the Order of Consolidation, granted May 24, 2024, by
Justice Sam L. Valleriani of the Supreme Court of the State of New York –
Monroe County, in the consolidated lawsuits, now titled Letitia
James v. Heartbeat International, et al., here.
Read the Decision on Motion to Consolidate, dated May 21, 2024, by Justice Sam
L. Valleriani of the Supreme Court of the State of New York – Monroe County, here.
Read the Memorandum of Law in Support of
Motion to Consolidate, filed by Thomas More Society attorneys on May 7, 2024, here.
Read about Thomas More Society’s
representation of Heartbeat International, CompassCare, and other pregnancy
help organizations in New York, and see relevant legal filings, here.
Thomas More Society is a
national not-for-profit law firm dedicated to restoring respect in law for
life, family, and freedom. Headquartered in Chicago and with offices across the
country, the Thomas More Society fosters support for these causes by providing
high quality pro bono legal services from local trial courts all the way up to
the United States Supreme Court. For more information, visit thomasmoresociety.org
Breaking: National Park Service Grants Knights of Columbus Permit to Hold Memorial Day Service – Update on guest’s interview
Richmond, VA—Today, First Liberty Institute and the international law firm McGuireWoods LLP announced that the National Park Service has granted a permit to the Knights of Columbus Petersburg Council 694 allowing the Knights annual Memorial Day Mass service in the Poplar Grove National Cemetery in Petersburg, Virginia. The Knights have held the service at the park every year since at least the 1960s.
“We are
grateful to the NPS for allowing the Knights to hold their service this
Memorial Day,” said John Moran, Partner at McGuireWoods.
Roger
Byron, Senior Counsel at First Liberty, added, “The Knights are thrilled that
they will be able to exercise their religious beliefs and keep this honorable
tradition alive. We appreciate the tremendous support of Governor
Youngkin and Attorney General Miyares in this case.”
Founded
almost 150 years ago in the United States, the Knights of Columbus is a
Catholic fraternal service order with over 2 million members worldwide. One
long-standing way the Knights have lived out their faith and their patriotism
is by holding Memorial Day masses to honor and pray for the nation’s fallen
soldiers. Until last year, the Knights had always held
a Memorial Day mass within the Poplar Grove National Cemetery, and the mass (or
a prayer service when a priest was not available) had been celebrated there
every year without incident since at least the 1960s. But last year, for
the first time, the NPS denied the Knights a permit to hold the service in the
cemetery, citing a new policy that designates “religious services” as
prohibited “demonstrations.”
A lawsuit
against NPS filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia by First Liberty Institute and the international law firm
McGuireWoods LLP was dismissed after an agreement to allow the service was
reached.
# # #
About
First Liberty Institute
First Liberty Institute is the largest legal organization in the
nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious freedom for all Americans.
BOMBSHELL INTERNAL DOCUMENT CALLS FOR REFORM OF JESUITS
In an internal document leaked to the press, a prominent Uruguayan Jesuit described in detail the many reasons why the Jesuits are in crisis and decline around the world and called for significant reform of the religious order. READ
Friday, May 24, 2024
New York high court upholds mandated insurance coverage for abortion, Diocese of Albany to appeal ruling
CV NEWS FEED // New York’s highest court ruled on May 21 that it would uphold legislation requiring insurance companies to cover abortions. In response, the Diocese of Albany announced it will appeal the ruling.
“While we respect the
decision issued today by the New York State Court of Appeals we will again seek
review by the United States Supreme Court of this critical challenge to
religious freedom,” the Diocese said in the May 21 statement.
The Diocese argued
that “regulatory action by the state to require religious organizations to
provide and pay for coverage of abortion in their employee health plans” is
“unconstitutional” and “involves government entanglement in the fundamental
rights of free exercise of faith and conscience.”
State financial regulators approved the pro-abortion regulation in 2017. The state legislature codified it into law in 2022.
As CatholicVote previously reported, in 2021, the Diocese of Albany, together with a group of Catholic and Anglican nuns and several other dioceses and Christian churches across denominations, filed suit against the state over the regulation.
Becket Fund, a religious liberty law foundation involved in the case, stated on its information page: “Each group is challenging New York’s abortion mandate because it believes that life begins at the moment of conception, and that to intentionally end the life of an unborn child is a grave moral sin.”
According to the
Becket Fund, the Diocese had previously asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear
its case on April 23.
The Supreme Court
agreed to consider the case, then sent it back to the state’s highest court to
reconsider. The state’s May 21 decision to uphold the regulation is the result
of the high court’s reconsideration. According to a May 21 Associated Press News report, the high court found that
the state’s criteria for religious exemptions were “too vague,” giving
officials “too much discretion to determine which companies wouldn’t have to
follow the rule.”
This week on Faith On Trial
Listen now: https://faith-on-trial.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-breen-mike-gonzalez-5-25-2024-ngYcjdEU
Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Biden Admin Files Charges Against More Pro-Life Americans After Putting a Dozen People in Prison
(LifeSiteNews) – The Biden administration has already put a dozen pro-life Americans in prison for protesting abortion, but that’s apparently not enough for Biden and the radical abortion activists in his administration.
The Justice Department on Monday filed suit
against two pro-life groups and several pro-life advocates on Monday by falsely
claiming their abortion protests are intimidating and somehow violate the bogus
FACE law that limits the free speech rights of pro-life Americans. Biden’s
cronies accuse them of “intimidating” abortion customers at two abortion
businesses in Ohio.
Biden officials claim the two groups, Citizens
for a Pro-Life Society and Red Rose Rescue, along with seven pro-life
Americans, violated the FACE law. After putting a dozen pro-life Americans in
prison on bogus charges, these new charges seek tens of thousands of dollars in
“fines” for violating the law that infringes on pro-life free speech.
The Justice Department is seeking financial
damages, including $20,516 for first violations and $30,868 for subsequent
offenses as well as injunctive relief as provided by the FACE Act.
A DOJ press release does not mention criminal
charges, but nothing prevents Biden officials from bringing them.
Monica Miller, who heads the Citizens for a
Pro-Life Society group, denied any wrongdoing and told LifeNews that she is one
of the people named in the legal charges the Biden administration is bringing.
She indicated Father Fidelis Moscinski, a Catholic priest, is also charged
along with Laura Gies, Clara McDonald, Jay Smith, Audrey Whipple and Lauren
Handy, who is already in federal prison based on the first round of disputed
FACE charges.
Miller said her pro-life activities – which
include protests outside abortion centers as well as handing women inside
abortion centers red roses with information about abortion alternatives, do not
violate the FACE law because they do not threaten anyone nor do they block
“access” to abortion
Miller said they “never block anything or
anyone–and if the Department of Justice is coming after us for our
peaceful–life-saving efforts it’s because they will simply play fast and loose
with the FACE language having to do with ‘physical obstruction’ that
prevents ‘freedom of movement.’”
She indicated that there have been 37 abortion
protests and no one in any of the protests has been charged with anything until
now.
As a result of the pro-life activities, five
babies were saved from abortions.
“We have NEVER been charged with FACE, and
indeed, the red rose rescue we did at the Planned Parenthood in
Bedford Heights, June 5, 2021, one of the two that involves this DOJ
accusation, — all charges were dropped,” Miller indicated. “We have every
confidence that through our great attorneys we will prevail over this bogus
attempt by the weaponized JOJ to drag even RRR under its persecution of those who
seek to defend the unborn from violence.”
Pro-life women reportedly denied medical care in jail
A group of House lawmakers are calling for answers amid reports that two pro-life women were denied “necessary medical care” while in prison awaiting sentencing. Jean Marshall, 74, and Heather Idoni, 59, were convicted of violating the controversial Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act for blocking access to a notorious late-term abortion facility in Washington, D.C. READ
Friday, May 17, 2024
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
BIDEN ADMIN TO ISSUE GOVERNMENT PHOTO ids TO NON-CITIZENS
The Biden administration is planning to roll out a taxpayer-funded program giving government-issued identification cards to thousands of illegal migrants crossing the southern border. FOX News reported late Thursday afternoon that “the pilot program is expected to commence this summer with the distribution of approximately 10,000 cards.” READ
Possible Trump-DeSantis ticket and other things
By Deacon Mike Manno
(The Wanderer) – There is a lot of hubbub this week about
the possibility of a Trump-DeSantis ticket this fall. Of course the speculation
of who Mr. Trump will chose as his running-mate will dominate this year’s
political guessing game, as the VP choice always does. But this year it is even
more intriguing.
And considering that several other VP candidates are also
from Florida, it might be an interesting exercise to see how this might play
out. First let’s look at the Constitutional problems such a ticket would
produce. As we all know, the election will be determined by which candidate can
gain a majority of the electoral vote.
The Electoral College is made up of representatives from
each state in numbers equivalent to that state’s total membership in Congress,
that is House members and two Senators. Thus to obtain a majority a candidate
for president – and the same goes for vice president – needs 270 electoral votes
for election.
The Constitution places very little restrictions on the
electors except for this: “The electors shall meet in their respective states,
and vote by ballot for two persons, of
whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves.”
Consider a close election in which the electoral majority
for president is decided by 29 votes. If Trump is the winner, what happens to
DeSantis? Florida’s 30 electors may not cast their vice presidential votes for
him. So who is elected vice president?
According to the constitution, in the event that no one
receives the 270 votes, the senate will choose the vice president from among
the two top electoral vote winners. Now if the Democrats hold the senate the
candidate selected will most probably be Kamala Harris, resulting in a
Trump-Harris Administration. You’d have to go back to the early days of the
republic, Adams-Jefferson, to find a similar situation.
Would the GOP run that risk? In 2000 George W. Bush, and
his vice presidential choice Dick Cheney, were both from Texas. They solved the
problem by having Mr. Cheney move back to his home state of Wyoming. Could that
happen for a Trump-DeSantis ticket? As governor DeSantis can’t take up
residence out of state, but would Mr. Trump do so?
Of course the Democrats in New York might just solve Mr.
Trump’s dilemma for him by providing him a residence at Rikers Island.
By the way, just so you know, the situation is much
different if no presidential candidate reaches 270 votes. In that case the House
must choose from the top three candidates, with each state getting one vote,
thus it takes 26 states to win.
***
We’re all aware of the current commotions (riots?) on our
college campuses by the modern-day Nazi Youth. Several months ago before all the
Jew-shaming started, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Expression (FIRE)
released, in conjunction with the College Pulse, a report of how free speech
was tolerated or not on the nation’s campuses.
The report covered 254 colleges and surveys from 55,102
individuals from those campuses, from which the report made it’s College Free
Speech Rankings for 2024. Here are a sample of the findings, starting at the
bottom.
“Harvard University obtained the lowest score possible,
0.00, and is the only school with an ‘Abysmal’ speech climate range[O1] .
The University of Pennsylvania, the University of South Carolina, Georgetown
University, and Fordham University also ranked in the bottom five,” it
reported.
Additionally, “Students from schools in the bottom five
were more biased toward allowing controversial liberal speakers on campus over
conservative ones and were more accepting of students using disruptive and
violent forms of protest to stop a campus speech. … Deplatforming attempts that occurred at
schools ranked in the bottom five had an alarming 81% success rate.”
The four schools listed as “Good” on free speech were
Michigan Technological University, Auburn University, the University of New
Hampshire, and Oregon State University. Rounding out the top five was Florida
State University with a rating of “Above Average.”
Here’s how some of the leading institutions who are in the
forefront of the latest campus uprisings were ranked: George Washington
University, 185; Columbia University, 213; and Yale University, 234. The sorry
state of higher education today.
***
Several notes of interest on my radio program:
A few weeks ago we had on Ed Flynn, you might remember from
his and his wife’s book, Thunder of
Justice. He is the author of a new book exploring the messages of the
alleged Marian apparition at Garabandal, Spain. The alleged apparitions
occurred to four young girls, 11 and 12 years old, from 1961 to 1965. The
messages reportedly from the Blessed Mother contained warnings about a future
miracle, a chastisement, and a divine reset.
The messages have created quite a stir and Flynn was on the
program to talk about the new book, Garabandal,
The Warning and The Great Miracle. If you follow the link at the
bottom you can hear the interview by selecting Episode 408.
Then last week we had on the program Fr. Tad Pacholcyk,
senior ethicist at the National Catholic Bioethical Center in Philadelphia. He
was on to discuss the ethical considerations and moral teachings on in vitro
fertilization and related matters. This, of course, is a subject that has been
thrust to the forefront of political and religious conversations since the
Alabama Supreme Court ruled in February that frozen embryos were human
children. Again, you can find the link at the bottom of the column; go to
Episode 410.
What happened to Episode 409? Well that one was one of the
most interesting we had this year. One of our guests was our own Dexter Duggan
who spent 20+ minutes with me in a wide ranging discussion from St. Francis de
Sales to bias in journalism and abortion law in Arizona. Good interview, but I
did make one mistake: when I gave the studio the program notes, I misspelled
Dexter’s name by leaving out a G.
Dexter: mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa!
Report from the Iowa Catholic Conference
Roundup
of the 2024 legislative session
Every organization that advocates at the Capitol has
successes and disappointments. The Iowa Catholic Conference (ICC) invites you
to join a short Zoom webinar with a recap of the 2024 Iowa legislative session.
The webinar will be held on Wednesday, May 22 at 7 p.m. You can learn about the
ICC’s advocacy efforts as well as hear updates on the new immigration law and
the “heartbeat” abortion law. Don't miss this opportunity to engage! Please
register here.
Lawsuits
challenge new immigration law
A lawsuit has been filed in federal court challenging the
new state law on “illegal reentry by certain aliens.” It asks for the law to be
stopped from going into effect on July 1 and a finding that the law is
unconstitutional. It argues Senate File 2340 could cause someone who has
previously been deported from the U.S. to face jail time or be deported,
including those in the country legally with a green card or with a valid asylum
claim. The American Immigration Council, American Civil Liberties Union and
ACLU of Iowa filed the suit on behalf of the Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice.
The federal Department of Justice has also filed a lawsuit
against the law arguing that the federal government has exclusive power to
regulate immigration.
The Iowa bishops oppose enforcement-only measures that
reduce humanitarian protections and provide no viable solutions for long-time
residents without legal status.
The
law:
Makes it an aggravated misdemeanor for a person who has
been previously denied admission or deported from the US to be in Iowa.
Does not allow police to make arrests on the school
property, church grounds or hospitals.
Requires a judge, after a conviction, to order the person
to return to the country from which the person entered.
Bills
approved by the governor
Gov. Reynolds is wrapping up the signing of bills from the
legislative session. Among the bills of interest signed:
SF 2251, expanding Medicaid health insurance coverage for a
mother for a full year after the baby is born (ICC supported)
HF 2319, prohibiting counties and cities from funding
guaranteed income programs (ICC opposed).
SF 2421, which creates the Choose Iowa Food Purchasing Pilot Project to help support local food purchases by schools, food banks, and emergency feeding organizations, and directs $300,000 in funding to the program (ICC supported the provision).
Tuesday, May 7, 2024
The War On Science
By Bill Donohue, Catholic
League president
Anti-Catholics are famous for saying the Catholic Church is
anti-science. Yet it is well acknowledged that the role played by the Catholic
Church in the making of the scientific revolution was central. Today, those who
are profoundly anti-science are militant secularists, many of whom, ironically,
work in higher education and in the medical profession.
It was scientists like Copernicus, Boyle, Linnaeus,
Faraday, Kelvin, Rutherford and Kepler who were responsible for the origins of
modern science. As David Klinghoffer notes, they were “overwhelmingly
religious.” To be specific, they sought to understand God through his creation.
This doesn’t stop Catholic critics from pointing to Galileo
as the classic example of the anti-science legacy of the Catholic Church.
But Galileo did not get into trouble because of his ideas;
after all, his ideas were taken from a priest, Copernicus, who was never
punished. Indeed, Father Roger Boscovich continued to explore Copernican ideas
at the same time that Galileo was charged with heresy, without attracting a bit
of opposition. Had Galileo not presented his hypothesis as fact—that was the
heresy—he would have escaped trouble.
Contrary to the mythology, Galileo never spent a single day
in prison. Nor was he tortured. In fact, he spent his time under “house arrest”
in an apartment in a Vatican palace, with a servant. More important, his work
was initially praised by the Catholic Church: Pope Urban VIII bestowed on him
many gifts and medals. A century later all of Galileo’s works were published,
and in 1741 Pope Benedict XIV granted him an imprimatur.
Today many of those who follow science are being punished
for doing so. Just consider what is happening to students and professors who
insist that sex is binary.
When a 67-year-old woman found someone “with a penis”
grooming himself next to a young girl in a Planet Fitness ladies’ locker room
in Fairbanks, Alaska, she took a photo of him to prove her experience. Those
who run the gym said he had every right to be there: he identified as a woman,
so that was that. She was banned from ever entering again.
When a man walked around totally naked in a Planet Fitness
ladies’ locker room in North Carolina, he was arrested for indecent exposure.
But not because the gym is unalterably opposed to such behavior—they were upset
because he didn’t tell them in advance that he believes he is a woman. In other
words, indecent exposure is not indecent if the pervert with male genitalia
says he is a woman.
“Brittney Griner and Her Wife Are Expecting Their First
Child.” That is the headline published by “Today” on the famous woman
basketball player and her girlfriend.
In the Planet Fitness examples, and in the “Today”
instance, it is painfully obvious that we are living in a surreal world, one
where politics has thrown science overboard.
A man can say that he is a woman—or a worm for that
matter—but when self-identification contradicts reality, such declarations are
palpably false. To be explicit, there is no such thing as a transgender person.
It is a fiction. We are either male or female (intersex persons are not a third
sex). Planet Fitness can rely on politics, e.g., the ideology of
transgenderism, but in doing so it is contradicting science.
Similarly, it is a legal fiction to say that two people of
the same sex can marry. Marriage is a universal institution designed to channel
the sex drive of men and women in a socially responsible way. An
important function of marriage is the possibility of the procreation of
children; they need a stable and patterned environment in which to grow.
In other words, the most important cell in society, the
family, is integrally tied to the institution of marriage. They are both the
reserve of one man and one woman, and no amount of ideological
protestation matters.
Brittany and her lover are denied by nature from having a
family. They can rent a womb, acquire someone else’s baby, or adopt the
children of some other couple, but they cannot create their own offspring.
That’s the way nature, and nature’s God, work.
Science is not based on whim or fancy. It is based on laws
that reflect the empirical reality of nature.
In a sane society, those who teach that the sexes are
interchangeable, and that two people of the same sex can realistically marry
and have a baby, should be fired for misrepresenting science. They are more
akin to the devotees of the Flat Earth Society than they are to serious
scholars.
To those who say such a position is lacking in compassion
for those who disagree with this analysis, it needs to be said that when
compassion conflicts with truth, it needs to take a back seat.
It is regrettable, yet understandable, that those who work in higher education and in the medical profession have witnessed an attrition in the prestige they once enjoyed. They alone are to blame and they alone can fix it. Rediscovering the verities of science is a good place to start.
Groups funding protests donated to Biden
Many of the groups financially backing pro-Palestine protests on college campuses reportedly have financial ties to President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign and billionaires George Soros and Bill Gates. Donors funding the protests “include some of the biggest names in Democratic circles: [George] Soros, [David] Rockefeller and [Susan and Nick] Pritzker,” POLITICO reported. READ
New York ag sues pro-life centers
Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James is suing Heartbeat International and 11 pregnancy resource centers for promoting the abortion reversal pill. The suit claims the pro-life groups make “false and misleading statements” about the pill’s effectiveness. READ
Saturday, May 4, 2024
‘Wokeness’ expert: protests show ‘rise of victimhood’ among youth
Catholic author Noelle Mering recently published a piece for The Daily Wire, exploring the problem at the root of the recent college protests. The students’ message is clear, Mering said: “we want a new regime in charge and it’s not the one reflected in the stars and stripes.” The protests, however, point to a deeper issue within the education system, as Mering points out. READ
Catholic support for Trump soars
According to a recent poll, significantly more American Catholics – particularly Hispanics – support Trump now than during the run-up to the 2020 Presidential Election. The survey found that 55% of respondents who listed their religion as Catholic preferred Trump, compared to 43% who favored Biden. This marks a drastic shift from four years ago when Catholic support for the same two candidates was essentially split evenly. READ
Friday, May 3, 2024
This week on FOT: IVF; what the Church teaches
What the Church teaches on IVF, this week on Faith On Trial.
Listen to the podcast now: https://faith-on-trial.simplecast.com/episodes/fr-tadeusz-pachloczyk-5-4-2024-exdxr16X
Additional resources on this topic
These are links to the two YouTube videos Fr. Tad mentioned
during the program:
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Pelosi: Dems will kill filibuster for abortion if Biden wins
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, stated during a Monday MSNBC interview that if President Joe Biden is reelected and Democrats control both houses of Congress, the party will do away with the filibuster to pass a national pro-abortion law. “Very clearly we can enshrine into the law Roe v. Wade,” said the former speaker, a self-professed Catholic. READ
Florida sues Biden over pro-LGBTQ Title IX changes
Florida – along with several other red states and women’s groups – announced it is suing the Biden administration over the Department of Education’s recent pro-LGBTQ changes to Title IX. “Biden is abusing his constitutional authority to push an ideological agenda that harms women and girls and conflicts with the truth,” Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wrote on X after announcing the suit. READ
Full-Blown Anti-Semitism
By Deacon Mike Manno
(The Wanderer) –
Shortly after I was born, my parents moved to Des Moines, Iowa from Richmond,
Virginia. Both my parents were born and raised in Philadelphia, where the rest
of our family resided, but they moved to Richmond for only one year, and it was
during that year that I was born. Thus, while most people who know me think I
was born in Philly it was really Richmond.
My dad was a
printer and had a print-shop in Philadelphia that he ultimately lost to the
city over a civil eminent domain action. They then moved to take a new job in
Richmond.
While there,
dad found and applied for a job in Des Moines. He didn’t fly so he drove his
old Chevy from Richmond to Des Moines for the interview. The firm was a large
business with factories in DM as well as several other major cities including
Kansas City, the firm’s headquarters.
The result
was a job offer as head printer. My dad turned it down saying he had applied
for the plant manager’s positon and didn’t want to move his wife and new born
son halfway across the country for a job similar to the one that he held.
So he drove
back to Richmond. While he was traveling the folks in Des Moines were contacted
by the president of the firm who was en route to Europe on an ocean liner. They
explained the situation with dad. When told of the result, he asked if they
thought dad could do the manager’s job. The answer was yes so the president
then told them to hire him.
When he
returned to Richmond, mom told him he had the job he wanted. They packed and
moved to Des Moines.
The reason
why I bring this is up is that the president of the company was Jewish, in fact,
the company was owned by a Jewish family.
When my
family arrived and moved into our new home, the family member who ran the
company locally, and his wife kindly welcomed him and mom to Iowa. Mrs. Jewish
Boss even bought a beautiful nick-knack mirror for our living room and later
updated it with gold trim. That mirror is now in my living room and serves as a
permanent memory of those early days in our family history and the welcoming
Jewish family that made room for a Catholic family in a new city.
I remember
the day my mom told me that dad’s boss couldn’t shop, eat, or visit certain
places because of his Jewish faith, and how we should act and think
differently. As I grew it dawned on me that the Big Boss in Kansas City didn’t
have a Jewish name. My father explained that during the war (WWII) he changed
it so if he was captured by the Germans they would not know he belonged to the
people who they thought should be exterminated.
My dad
loyally worked for that firm for some twenty-plus years until his death. At
that time members of the company were more than supportive of mom, my brother,
and myself.
Later we
went through the same thing with the Civil Rights movement and I learned that
one of my father’s employees could not eat at a drugstore due to his skin
color. My parents taught me the same about our “colored” friends. I remember at
my dad’s funeral that same, now elderly, black man, approached my mom at the
internment ceremony and asked if he could have the honor of one of the flowers from
the casket spray.
And now Jews
are the enemy. American academics now seem to be taking up verbal (and sometimes
physical) arms against anyone who is Jewish or supports Jews or the nation of
Israel. One wonders if this is America or 1930s Germany and whether or not we
should be expecting a new Kristallnacht.
The
“peaceful protests” that are now engulfing some of our major universities, most
rising from Anti-Semitism and pro-Hamas individuals, are clearly outgrowths of
far left political philosophies, encompassing a wide range of leftist thought.
This is the icing on the cake for a movement that has striven over the years to
weaken our institutions and to bring Cultural Marxism and all that it implies,
to the forefront of the American conversation.
But it is
not surprising to me that the latest hubbub (dare we call them riots) has grown
out of Columbia University. The school has too many historical connections with
the type of ideology that is on display right now.
It was the
Communist Bella Dodd, prior to her return to the Catholic Church, who honed her
Communist ideology in and around Columbia. On orders from Moscow she placed
over 1,200 Communists in U. S. seminaries during the 20s and 30s in order to
infiltrate the Church with Communist ideology. In the early 50s she told Bishop
Fulton Sheen that world-wide several of the Red plants had achieved the rank of
cardinal and bishop, indicating a successful mission.
Dodd graduated
from Columbia where she made her first Communist connections and taught at the
nearby Hunter College. She was tasked by the Communist Party U.S.A. to
infiltrate the New York teachers’ union, which she did.
Columbia was
also the 1934 landing point for a cadre of professors from the Frankfurt School
in Germany where the concept of Critical Theory was developed. It taught that immutable
human traits were responsible for all societal inequities. Thus it divided us
into tribes, some as oppressors and others as the oppressed.
This was
Cultural Marxism, and one of the main proponents of it, Herbert Marcuse, was
himself a product of that same Frankfurt School. That ideology has spread,
throughout the academic world from college down to elementary school, and
upward to professionals in all walks of life who now control a significant part
of the new American establishment.
Any wonder
why this is happening now. It is to disrupt our institutions and social
conventions. It’s been brewing for a while and is just now boldly coming out of
the shadows of academia where it had been hiding.
-30-
(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every weekend on Faith On Trial or podcast at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Report from the Iowa Catholic Conference
The Catholic bishops of Iowa have released a statement addressing migration issues including the new “illegal reentry” law set to take effect July 1 and a call for immigration reform with humanitarian protections.
The bishops said, “While Catholics may disagree within the limits of justice on the specific approach to reforming the immigration system, we ask lawmakers in Washington, D.C., to resist easy answers and do their job … we again ask for ‘border protection policies that are consistent with humanitarian values and with the need to treat all individuals with respect, while allowing the authorities to carry out the critical task of identifying and preventing entry of terrorists and dangerous criminals.”
Roundup on the 2024
legislative session
Every organization that advocates at the Capitol has successes and disappointments. The Iowa Catholic Conference (ICC) invites you to join a Zoom webinar with a recap of the 2024 Iowa legislative session. You can learn about the ICC’s advocacy efforts as well as hear updates on the new immigration law and the “heartbeat” abortion law. The webinar will be held on Wednesday, May 22 at 7 p.m. Don't miss this opportunity to engage! Please register here.
Civilize It: Unifying a Divided Church
On Tuesday, May 14 at 2 p.m., join Cardinal Robert McElroy, Bishop Robert Barron and Bishop Daniel Flores as they dialogue on the challenge of polarization in the Church today and the path forward. The conversation will include reflections on their roles as shepherds and leaders in their dioceses and in the U.S. Church, and on important topics such as the Synod on Synodality, encounter, and where to find hope amid the polarization.
Gloria Purvis, renowned Catholic speaker and host of The Gloria Purvis Podcast from America Magazine, will moderate the conversation. This virtual event is co-sponsored by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic Charities USA, Glenmary Home Missioners, and the Jesuit Conference. You can watch the livestream here.