Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Biden’s Monumental Ignorance Of Catholicism

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue

On January 30, when President Biden was walking on the White House lawn, he was asked a few questions by reporters. One of them asked about Catholic opposition to publicly funded abortions. “Catholic bishops are demanding that federal tax dollars not fund abortions.”

In an angry reply, Biden pointed his finger and said, “No, they are not all doing that, nor is the Pope doing that.” 

Biden’s monumental ignorance of basic Catholic teachings on abortion is startling. 

From the day abortion was legalized by the Supreme Court in 1973, right up to today, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has not only opposed abortion, it has resolutely opposed publicly funded abortions. There is not a single bishop that Biden can name who agrees with him on this subject. 

Indeed, as recently as January 27, the USCCB’s Pro-Life Committee, chaired by Bishop Michael Burbridge, sent a letter to House and Senate leaders about this issue. Burbridge said that the “government should never fund the destruction of innocent preborn children.” 

For Biden to misrepresent Pope Francis is even more appalling. 

On September 15, 2021, Pope Francis was unequivocal on this issue. “Abortion is murder.” He rightly observed that Catholic teaching is consistent with science. “Scientifically, it’s a human life. The textbooks teach us that. But is it right to take it out to solve a problem? This is why the Church is so strict on this issue because accepting this is kind of like accepting daily murder.” 

On October 10, 2018, Pope Francis posed an interesting set of questions. “How can an action that ends an innocent and defenseless life in its blossoming stage be therapeutic, civilized or simply human? I ask you: Is it right to do away with a human life in order to solve a problem? Is it right to hire a hitman in order to solve a problem? One cannot. It is not right to do away with a human being, however small, in order to solve a problem. It is like hiring a hitman.” 

Biden is either profoundly ignorant of Catholicism, or he is lying through his teeth. Either way, for a man who loves to wear his Catholicism on his sleeve, he is a public embarrassment to Catholics the world over. Never has there been a White House occupant who more consistently seeks to sabotage Roman Catholicism than Joe Biden.

Monday, January 30, 2023

Houck NOT GUILTY on all counts; Fed’s efforts to criminalize pro-lifers fizzles in Philly

The verdict is in, and pro-life dad Mark Houck has been acquitted in federal court. United States of America v. Mark Houck has resulted in a victory for Houck and his defense team United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Statement by Peter Breen, executive vice president of the Thomas More Society:

“We are, of course, thrilled with the outcome,” stated Peter Breen, Thomas More Society Executive Vice President & Head of Litigation. “Mark and his family are now free of the cloud that the Biden administration threw upon them. We took on Goliath - the full might of the United States government - and won. The jury saw through and rejected the prosecution's discriminatory case, which was harassment from day one. This is a win for Mark and the entire pro-life movement. The Biden Department of Justice's intimidation against pro-life people and people of faith has been put in its place.”

We made it, Dad -- We're going to the SUPER BOWL with the Ferko String Band!!!

Biden And The FDA Push New Chemical Abortion Protocols That Endanger Women

Heritage Report: In the U.S., a recent study in states where Medicaid dollars are used to pay for elective abortions found that Medicaid-eligible women using the abortion pill had a 53 percent greater odds of making an abortion-related visit to the ER than similar women who had surgical abortions. If we assume women today experience serious complications from the pill at the same rate as seen during U.S. clinical trials, that would put the number of women admitted to the hospital for pill-related reasons between 197 and 2,958 a year. Heritage Expert: Jonathan Abbamonte

How Blue State Election Official Responds to DACA Recipient Proclaiming, ‘We Are Voting’

Heritage Report:  At a Jan. 10 hearing held by the Minnesota House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee, a young woman named Angelico Bello was among numerous speakers on a bill to grant state driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. “I’m a proud product of my mom. I’m also a DACA recipient,” Bello told the committee, referring to the federal program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. “As a DACA recipient, it has also been hard to have family members without a driver’s license.” Heritage Expert: Fred Lucas

Friday, January 27, 2023

This is a special edition of Faith On Trial

About a week ago the Bishop of Des Moines, William Joensen, published a document, “Gender Identity Guide and Policies,” which dealt with the issue of transgenderism, the Catholic approach, and pastoral care for those suffering from gender dysphoria. This week we tried to explain the document, from the diocese we had John Huynh, director of Faith Journey, and from the National Catholic Bioethics Center we had one of the foremost experts on Catholic bioethics, Fr. Tad Pacholczyk, Ph.D. Our program airs at 2 p.m. on Saturday and 9 p.m. on Sunday, Central Time.

The program will be posted as a podcast around noon on Saturday and it can be found at our podcast site: https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/. The podcasts are listed in order with the most recent always on top. The document itself is only six pages and can be found at:

https://www.dmdiocese.org/filesimages/Resources/1_16_23%20SOGI%20Policy%20FAQ%20final.pdf.

This is a growing issue around the country and we hope this program and the document will aid in your understanding of matter. Feel free to share.



Wednesday, January 25, 2023

Direct TV drops conservative news channel

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue

Catholics who use DirecTV should cancel their subscription and access a new carrier. DirecTV, which is mostly owned by AT&T, has decided to drop Newsmax, the cable TV station that offers quality political discourse. Why? Because Newsmax provides for a conservative viewpoint, and the left-wing operators who run DirecTV want to cancel that voice.

DirecTV is claiming the decision to drop Newsmax has to do with a quarrel over fees. Nonsense. Newsmax, which has the 4th highest TV ratings of any cable channel, has made it clear that the real issue is its political viewpoint. Some Democrats in Congress have been feeding the cancel culture with veiled appeals to government censorship of cable and satellite TV providers.

It is important that Newsmax succeed. It disseminates a fair presentation of Catholic issues, making it a unique enterprise in TV land.

To read Newsmax’s account, click here.

Tuesday, January 24, 2023

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signs Students First Act into law

Gov. Kim Reynolds
DES MOINES -- Governor Kim Reynolds signed HF 68 into law today amid hundreds of supporters in the Iowa State Capitol. The Students First Act makes state education funding available for K-12 students who choose to attend private schools.  

“Public schools are the foundation of our education system and for most families they will continue to be the option of choice, but they aren’t the only choice,” Governor Reynolds stated. “For some families, a different path may be better for their children. With this bill, every child in Iowa, regardless of zip code or income, will have access to the school best suited for them.”  

Universal eligibility will be phased in over three years. All incoming Kindergarteners and all public-school students will be eligible beginning year one with the start of the 2023-2024 school year. Eligibility for families of children currently enrolled in accredited private schools will be income based over the first two years.  

  • During the 2023-2024 school year, private school students with household incomes at or below 300% of the federal poverty level (FPL), currently $83,250 for a family of four, are eligible.  
  • In the 2024-2025 school year, private school eligibility expands to include families with household incomes at or below 400% FPL, currently $111,000 for a family of four, are eligible. 
  • Beginning in the 2025-2026 school year, all K-12 students in Iowa are eligible regardless of family income.  

Parents or guardians who enroll their eligible children in an accredited private school will receive an amount equal to the per pupil funds allocated by the state to all public school districts each year. The funds are estimated at $7,598 per pupil for the 2023-2024 school year and will be deposited into an education savings account (ESA) to be used for tuition, fees, and other qualified education expenses. 

The state has issued a request for proposal (RFP) from businesses with experience managing ESA programs. The RFP was issued first for targeted small businesses in Iowa and will be posted publicly after 48 hours according to Iowa code. Responses are expected within three weeks. The vendor selected will manage the application process, support the transfer of funds from the state to ESA accounts of eligible students, and ensure program compliance.   

Once a vendor is selected and the system is implemented, the application period will begin. Applications will be accepted through June 30, 2023.  

Information is available on the Iowa Department of Education website at educateiowa.gov and will be updated regularly. Families interested in applying for ESAs can sign up to receive notifications when new information is posted on the webpage.  

Religion Clause: Federal Agencies Propose Rule Changes to Protect B...

On January 13, nine federal agencies published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (full text) in the Federal Register eliminating certain changes made in 2020 by the Trump Administration that loosened restrictions on faith-based organizations' operation of programs and activities funded by federal grants. (See prior posting.) The proposed new rules revert largely to the 2016 version of the agencies' rules. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking says in part:

“B]oth the 2016 Rule and the 2020 Rule contained provisions prohibiting providers from discriminating against a program beneficiary or prospective beneficiary “on the basis of religion, a religious belief, a refusal to hold a religious belief, or a refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice.” ... 

“The 2016 Rule required that, in programs supported by direct Federal financial assistance, beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries also be made aware of these prohibitions on discrimination, but the 2020 Rule removed this notice requirement.

“Because the purpose of making providers aware of nondiscrimination requirements is to ensure that beneficiaries can access services free from discrimination, ... all Agencies except USAID therefore propose to reinstate the requirement that organizations providing social services under Agencies’ direct Federal financial assistance programs give written notice to beneficiaries and prospective beneficiaries of certain nondiscrimination protections, and to apply this requirement to all such providers, whether they are faith-based or secular. The Agencies may, as appropriate, require providers to include this notice as part of a broader and more general notice of nondiscrimination on additional grounds.

“The 2016 Rule also required the notification to beneficiaries to inform them that, if they were to object to the religious nature of a given provider, the provider would be required to make reasonable efforts to refer them to an alternative provider. The 2020 Rule eliminated that requirement. The Agencies believe, however, that providing assistance to beneficiaries seeking alternative providers would help advance the overarching goal of facilitating access to federally funded programs and services. Without such assistance, it may be challenging for beneficiaries or prospective beneficiaries unfamiliar with Federal grant programs to identify other federally funded providers....

“Therefore, with the exception of USAID, the Agencies are proposing a modified version of the 2016 Rule’s referral procedure that would encourage Agencies, when appropriate and feasible, or State agencies and other entities that might be administering a federally funded social service program, to provide notice to beneficiaries or prospective beneficiaries about how to obtain information about other available federally funded service providers.

“Finally, with the exception of USAID, the Agencies are proposing to remove language added by the 2020 Rule stating that providers at which beneficiaries choose to expend indirect aid “may require attendance at all activities that are fundamental to the program.”


Wisconsin families ask appeals court to protect parental rights in education

MADISON, Wis. – Attorneys with Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Alliance Defending Freedom representing parents challenging a Madison Metropolitan School District policy filed their opening brief with the Wisconsin Court of Appeals Monday. The families are appealing their case after a lower court dismissed their lawsuit.

Lead counsel from WILL, together with ADF attorneys, argue in the suitDoe v. Madison Metropolitan School District, that the policy violates constitutionally protected parental rights. The policy instructs district employees to assist children of any age to adopt identities at odds with their biological sex, without notice to or consent from parents, and to conceal from parents the fact that school personnel are doing this unless a child “consents” to someone informing the parents.

“Parents know and love their children better than anyone else,” said WILL Deputy Counsel Luke Berg. “Both the Wisconsin and U.S. Constitutions protect their right to decide what is best for their children.”

“Parents—not school boards—have the fundamental right to direct the upbringing, care, and education of children,” said ADF Senior Counsel Roger Brooks. “It is essential that school officials not hide information from parents if their child struggles with any type of mental or physical condition at school so they can make the best, informed decisions to protect the child’s health and wellbeing. We’re asking the Wisconsin Court of Appeals to protect a parent’s right to parent.”

The appeal explains that the parents’ lawsuit is “the only way to prevent lifelong harm to minors and preserve parents’ constitutional rights, because parents cannot be expected to know either the future or what the District is hiding from them.” The brief continues, “No professional organization recommends that untrained school officials secretly facilitate gender transitions without involving parents and experts.”

Advocates for Faith & Freedom 2023

Monday, January 23, 2023

The Faithful Carrier: Headed to the Supreme Court

Maryland “Catholic” Hospital Loses… Diocese Curbs Gender “Wokeness”

By Deacon Mike Manno

By now I think most have seen or heard about the un-woke gender policies that have been adopted by Des Moines Bishop William Joensen. As diocesan clergy, I received an advance copy of the policy but was still surprised when an old Creighton buddy called at 7:30 in the morning it was released to the public to congratulate me for having a bishop willing to take a firm stand on this gender identity nonsense infecting society.

It seems he heard of our new policy on the FOX News program Fox and Friends which I actually had on at the time. I also noticed the story was picked up nationally by Newsmax as well. Now I can’t listen to them all, but at least before 8 a.m. the story had made it to two national outlets.

But, more about that at the end, I first want to start in Maryland where a “Catholic” hospital lost a round in federal court to a transgender man — that is, a woman who is making the change — for damages when the hospital, citing Catholic ethical teachings and Catholic medical guidelines, refused to perform a hysterectomy.

The man (I guess) was suing the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS), and the University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center, among others, over the refusal to allow the hysterectomy to be performed in its hospital. The hospital had claimed protection from the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act which basically protects religious institutions from government interference.

Now, before we get into the weeds of the case, we should determine exactly how a public institution was seeking protection of a legal doctrine and federal statute designed to protect religious communities, and why it cited Catholic teaching as a reason to object to the hysterectomy request.

Long story, but to make it short, here’s why, as explained by the court:

“The medical center was owned and operated as a Catholic hospital by Catholic Health Initiatives prior to being purchased by UMMS. When UMMS purchased the medical center in 2012, a condition of the ‘Asset Purchase Agreement’ was that ‘UMMS . . . shall continue to operate [St. Joseph] in a manner consistent with Catholic values and principles including complying with a ‘formal reporting mechanism’ to ensure St. Joseph is held accountable for its ‘Catholic identity.’ Specifically, UMMS agreed to ensure that St. Joseph’s board implemented the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Services (the “ERDs”), as promulgated by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, in St. Joseph’s provision of health care….

“Around the time of the sale, each of the defendants entered into a ‘Catholic Identity Agreement’ with the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Baltimore, which provided a ‘framework within which to continue authentic Catholic traditions and practices’ at St. Joseph. This agreement provides that, every two years, St. Joseph ‘will undergo an audit of its adherence to the’ ERDs by the National Catholic Bioethics Center.”

The court went on to explain that the ERDs — and this was key to the court’s ultimate ruling – say “[d]irect sterilization of either men or women…is not permitted in a Catholic health care institution” but that ‘[p]rocedures that induce sterility are permitted when their direct effect is the cure or alleviation of a present and serious pathology and a simpler treatment is not available.”

The last part of the ERDs quoted is what doomed the ship for the defendants. They had argued that they must comply with the Catholic teachings on gender transition that the National Catholic Bioethics Center, which audits hospital compliance, articulates as Catholic teaching in its guidance document: “Gender transitioning of any kind is intrinsically disordered because it cannot conform to the true good of the human person, who is a body-soul union unalterably created male or female. Gender transitioning should never be performed, encouraged, or positively affirmed as a good in Catholic health care.”

But the plaintiff argued that this was not a simple procedure to change gender, but that it was an allowed exception to the guidelines because it was being used to treat a known condition, gender dysphoria. It cited the testimony of the hospital’s chief medical officer as stating that hysterectomies were frequently performed at the hospital when connected with an identifiable medical condition that could not be solved by other means, “so long as [a] hysterectomy is consistent with the standard of care for a given diagnosis, the hysterectomy may be performed [at St. Joseph].”

Thus the court found that the medical ethics would have been satisfied had the hospital approved the surgery since gender dysphoria is a recognized medical disorder and the requested surgery was not for the purpose of elective sterilization but to treat this particular individual’s medical condition for which there was no other available treatment.

Accordingly, the court found that since St. Joseph was — for the purposes of this case — a “state actor” – the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act did not apply and therefore its refusal to perform the hysterectomy was discrimination on the basis of sex and granted summary judgment to the plaintiff.

The Diocese of Des Moines

Now, getting back to my home diocese. Our bishop has issued a document, pastoral in tone, but controversial nonetheless. In it he speaks of concern for our brothers who experience gender confusion and how the Church must continue to love and assist them in their travails. Two paragraphs, I think, sum up what he is trying to say, but for space needed to be edited here:

”In a culture that advances a highly subjective conception of love, many families of an adult or child with gender dysphoria will feel a sense of obligation to support their loved one by acceding to and advocating for an uncritical sense of ‘whatever is going to make them happy’….[Family members] will likely face pressure…from the prevailing culture to affirm and validate their loved one’s newly adopted gender and, in conjunction with medical personnel, to ‘resolve’ the dysphoria by electing to pursue surgical and hormonal interventions aimed at altering the biological sex of the affected person.

“Such treatments, especially for children, are invasive and disruptive when aspects of the entire person are taken into consideration…[but] these treatments do not promote the common good of society, particularly when it comes to the institutions of marriage and family….

“For the parents of a child who presents with gender dysphoria, the overarching priority is to genuinely assist the child by acknowledging the suffering involved and to accompany him or her along the path to personal healing, self-acceptance, integration, and peace. Any response that merely ratifies and reinforces the perceived disconnect between biological sex and gender affiliation is not genuine compassion.”

Here are the diocesan guidelines:

All entities of the diocese in areas where designation by sex is required the use of the person’s biological sex shall be used and pronouns must reflect this. No preferred pronouns may be used. All persons will use the bathrooms and locker rooms that matches their biological sex.

Participation in school, parish, and co-curricular activities must be consistent with the participant’s biological sex; all persons are to present themselves in the attire of their biological sex; entry into single-sex building and instructions are restricted to persons by their biological sex; no person is permitted to have or distribute any medication for the purpose of gender reassignment on Church property.”

This, of course, is a shorthand version of the document; the full document can be found at: https://www.dmdiocese.org/resources/evangelization-catechesis/catechetical-services/cladd.

Unfortunately, some have taken this as an affront to the LGBTQ community. One Democratic state senator suggested that Jesus would not be happy with this document. Sorry, senator. I think Jesus would thank the bishop for complementing His Father’s creation.

(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every week on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)

Friday, January 20, 2023

SCOTUS NEWS: Supreme Court investigators fail to identify who leaked Dobbs opinion

By Amy Howe

Supporters of abortion rights protest in front of the Supreme Court on May 2, 2022, hours after Politico published a draft of the Dobbs decision. (Katie Barlow)

The Supreme Court has not been able to determine who leaked a draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the court said on Thursday.

The unprecedented leak last May revealed that the court was privately poised to overturn the court’s landmark decisions establishing a constitutional right to an abortion. The court indicated on Thursday that investigators would continue to review some additional evidence, but the court’s two-page statement left open the possibility that the source of the leak may never be found.

The court’s statement denounced the leak as “a grave assault on the judicial process.” And a report by Gail Curley, the court official tasked with investigating the leak, suggested that the court’s document-handling policies should be beefed up to prevent future leaks. “If a Court employee disclosed the draft opinion,” Curley wrote, “that person brazenly violated a system that was built fundamentally on trust with limited safeguards to regulate and constrain access to very sensitive information.”

The court’s statement came eight-and-a-half months after Politico published Alito’s draft opinion on May 2, 2022. One day later, the Supreme Court confirmed that the leaked opinion was authentic, and Chief Justice John Roberts disclosed that he had directed Curley, who is the court’s marshal, to launch an investigation into the source of the leak.

The leaked opinion sparked protests from abortion-rights supporters and caused the court to take extra security precautions. Police officers erected fencing and metal barricades to keep protesters off the court’s plaza, while Attorney General Merrick Garland directed federal law-enforcement officials to provide security around the clock at the homes of all justices.

In early June, a California man was arrested near the home of Justice Brett Kavanaugh and charged with attempted murder of a Supreme Court justice. He told police he was upset by the leaked opinion.

The court released its decision in Dobbs on June 24. By a vote of 5-4, in an opinion that closely resembled the draft published by Politico, the court officially overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett, along with Kavanaugh, joined the Alito opinion.

In the months since Roberts announced the investigation into the leak, the court did not provide any additional information about the status of the investigation. In remarks last year at a judicial conference, Gorsuch revealed that Roberts had appointed an internal committee to investigate the leak, and he expressed hope that the justices would receive the committee’s report “soon.”

Thursday’s statement revealed that Curley and her team interviewed “almost 100 employees” – 82 of whom had access to the draft opinion. Despite those efforts, the “team to date has been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence,” the court said. The investigators will continue to follow up on a few outstanding leads, the statement added.  

The court also revealed that it consulted with Michael Chertoff, a former judge who served as the head of the Department of Homeland Security during the George W. Bush administration. Chertoff, the court said, was unable to identify anything that Curley and her team should have done as part of their investigation.

A 20-page report from Curley accompanied the court’s statement. Although investigators were unable to determine how the draft was provided to Politico, Curley wrote, they ruled out as “unlikely” the possibility that someone from outside the court had hacked into the court’s computer systems. And, Curley acknowledged, the COVID-19 pandemic “and resulting expansion of the ability to work from home, as well as gaps in the Court’s security policies, created an environment where it was too easy to remove sensitive information from the building and the Court’s IT networks, increasing the risk of both deliberate and accidental disclosures of Court-sensitive information.”

Curley’s report made a series of recommendations to improve confidentiality of documents at the court. She urged the justices to restrict access to sensitive documents and limit the number of hard copies in circulation. She also suggested that the court adopt a “universal policy” on “the mechanics of handling and safeguarding draft opinions and Court-sensitive documents” and put a system in place to track the printing and copying of such documents.

Curley reported that her investigation “focused on Court personnel – temporary (law clerks) and permanent employees – who had or may have had access to the draft opinion.” Curley did not indicate whether the report’s references to “employees” and “personnel” included the justices themselves.

In December, The New York Times reported on allegations of a 2014 breach of confidentiality at the court. Rob Schenck, who once played a leading role in the anti-abortion movement, said he learned the outcome of the court’s decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, involving religious rights and birth control for employees, several weeks before it was released. Schenck said that major donors to his non-profit relayed the news to him after dining with Alito and his wife. Alito denied Sch

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs wants to defund pro-life center for homeless pregnant women

'Hobbs' 'budget proposal takes $500,000 from pregnant, homeless women and provides $6.1 million in Title X contributions, generating millions in federal funding for abortion clinics."

PHOENIX, Arizona (LifeSiteNews) — Arizona’s new Democratic governor Katie Hobbs wants to defund a center that provides housing and support for homeless pregnant women and redirect the money to abortions. 

“Hobbs’ budget proposal takes $500,000 from pregnant, homeless women and provides $6.1 million in Title X contributions, generating millions in federal funding for abortion clinics,” according to an analysis by Cathi Herrod, president of the Center for Arizona Policy. 

She wrote in an op-ed in the AZ Central: 

Maggie’s Place doesn’t refer women for abortions, so Gov. Katie Hobbs wants to defund it, sending expectant mothers back to the streets. No abortions, no funding. These are the most vulnerable of the growing homeless in Arizona, where we led the nation in the rise of homelessness in 2021, with an increase of 30%. 

Lawmakers understand the state’s interest in caring for these vulnerable women and their unborn babies, so they increased funding for them from $200,000 to $500,000 in 2022. This pays for housing, basic care, parental training, mental health counseling and more to help women become self-sufficient. The maternity home served 88 pregnant women, 37 children and 40 babies in 2022. 

Hobbs’s proposal requires centers receiving money to support abortion. Her budget allocated “$200,000 in ongoing funding for pregnancy services that are inclusive of all options and support personal choice.” 

The budget proposal is just one more example of a leftist agenda item Hobbs has quickly tried to enact since taking office. She also signed an executive order that could force religious entities to provide adoption services to homosexual couples in violation of their faith and federal law. 

Hobbs’s husband also backs so-called “sex changes” for gender-confused children. 

National and state Democrats have also taken aim at pro-life pregnancy resource centers as part of their ongoing war against women choosing life. For example, Michigan Democratic governor Gretchen Whitmer vetoed funding for pro-life pregnancy options this summer. Senate and House Democrats also sent a letter this summer demanding that Google censor search results that show women their options to choose life. 

Pro-life churches, groups, and pregnancy resource centers have faced fire bombings, vandalism, and other attacks, with little to no pushback from the White House and leading Democrats. 

A leftist in Michigan even shot an 84-year-old volunteer who was simply knocking on doors and hoping to talk to residents about a ballot referendum.

Do Chinese Donations Explain Biden’s Energy Policies?

Heritage report: Under Biden’s anti-fossil fuel energy policies, Americans have been left with higher costs and a weaker economy while China has gained a larger market for its “green energy” wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicle batteries. Could the money and the policies be related? The New York Post reported that tens of millions in donations to the University of Pennsylvania came from Chinese donors after the Penn Biden Center was first announced in 2017. Heritage Expert: Diana Furchtgott-Roth

The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database Tops 1,400 Cases

Heritage report: The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database now includes 1,412 proven instances of election fraud, and our legal center is monitoring many other ongoing prosecutions. The database, which provides a sampling of recent election fraud cases, demonstrates the vulnerabilities within the electoral process and the need for reforms to secure free and fair elections for the American people. Heritage Expert: Hans von Spakovsky


Disney CEO Proven Wrong

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue  

We all make predictions, but most of the time they are of no real consequence when we’re wrong. Bob Iger, the Disney CEO, made a prediction nearly a year ago that not only proved him to be wrong, it proved how morally challenged he is. 

Last February, Iger, who at that time was the retired Disney CEO (he subsequently managed to worm his way back in), stuck his nose into something he should have stayed out of: he publicly announced his opposition to parental rights by condemning efforts by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and the state legislature, to ban teaching kids grades K-3 about sex. (The Disney CEO at the time, Bob Chapek, agreed and led the charge against parents.) 

The central issue driving this discussion was allowing teachers to question kids in the early grades about their status of being a boy or a girl. Are you happy being a boy or a girl? This baited question is designed to get children to consider the possibility of switching their sex. It is the most pernicious part of the LGBT agenda. 

Iger did more than encourage Disney to work against parental rights—he accused those who supported the bill of promoting hatred, and possibly violence. “If passed, this bill will put vulnerable, young LGBTQ people in jeopardy.” 

Iger demonized a large swath of Americans, mostly Christian, by accusing them of promoting a cause that endangers innocent children. It was a despicable thing to do. 

It is for these reasons that the Catholic League decided to do a documentary on what has happened to Disney. The wait is about over. The film will debut on Monday, January 23rd.

Thursday, January 19, 2023

America’s Biggest Issues: Conservatism vs. Progressivism

Religion Clause: New Michigan City Ordinance Permits Animal Sacrifice

As reported by the Detroit Free Press, the Hamtramck, Michigan City Council on Tuesday by a vote of 3-2 voted to amend the city's Animal Ordinance to permit animal sacrifices on residential property. The new Ordinance (full text) provides in part:

Any person wishing to conduct an animal sacrifice for religious purposes must notify the City by reporting such intention to the Clerk’s Office at least one week prior to the date of animal sacrifice;

(1) Such person shall provide the exact date and time of animal sacrifice to the City and shall schedule a time for the City to conduct post sacrifice inspection of the site to ensure, in the opinion of the inspector, that the area was properly cleaned and sanitized after the sacrifice was concluded.

(2) Such person shall pay the City a fee, as set by city council annually, for the sanitation inspection. Such fee shall be paid at the time when such person informs the City of the sacrifice as required above.

(B) Any and all actions necessary to restrict the act of sacrifice from public viewing must be taken without exception. The public, for the purposes of this subsection, shall be defined as any individual who has not formally indicated their intention to view the animal sacrifice.

Hamtramck has a large Muslim population and all members of City Council are Muslim.  Some Muslims sacrifice animals for Eid al-Adha.

Religion Clause: Title IX Religious Exemption Survives Constitution...

In Hunter v. United States Department of Education, (D OR, Jan. 12, 2023), an Oregon federal district court dismissed a suit brought by students who have attended a religious college or university challenging the application of the religious exemption in Title IX in a manner that allows religious colleges and universities to discriminate against LGBTQ students. Rejecting plaintiffs' equal protection claim, the court said in part:

“Plaintiffs have not alleged how the religious exemption fails intermediate scrutiny. Defendants point out that the Ninth Circuit has recognized “that free exercise of religion and conscience is undoubtedly, fundamentally important.”... Exempting religiously controlled educational institutions from Title IX—and only to the extent that a particular application of Title IX would not be consistent with a specific tenet of the controlling religious organization, see 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a)(3)—is substantially related to the government’s objective of accommodating religious exercise.”

The court rejected plaintiffs' Establishment Clause challenge applying the Lemon test. The court also rejected various other constitutional challenges to the exemption.


Mark Houck Lawyers: Congress Excluded Abortion Clinic ‘Escorts’ From Federal Protections - The Stream

Mark Houck Lawyers: Congress Excluded Abortion Clinic ‘Escorts’ From Federal Protections - The Stream: Congress purposefully excluded abortion clinic escorts from Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act protections, attorneys for pro-life father Mark Houck argued in a pretrial hearing Tuesday.

Tuesday, January 17, 2023

Diocese of Des Moines bans puberty blockers, cross-dressing, even preferred pronouns on property

A Catholic diocese in Iowa has enforced seven strict “gender identity” policies for all its parishes and schools — forbidding puberty blockers, cross-dressing and even preferred pronouns on its property.

The Diocese of Des Moines said the policies are mostly aimed at those it says suffer “gender dysphoria” and were produced “after two years of study, prayer, listening and consulting.

You can read the policy here: https://www.dmdiocese.org/filesimages/Resources/Gender%20Identity%20Guide%20and%20Policy_Final_13%20January%202023.pdf

Monday, January 16, 2023

The Perversion of the Clergy - The Stream

The Perversion of the Clergy - The Stream: It is one thing for a Christian leader to come with a secret agenda, hiding his or her real intentions under the cover of orthodoxy and apparent orthopraxy. It is another thing when a Christian leader, an ordained clergyman, a purported minister of the gospel, comes with an overtly perverse message. But that is what we are seeing today, right in front of our eyes.

The Religions Of Congress

By Deacon Mike Manno

(The Wanderer) – The Pew Research Center has released its findings of the religious makeup of the 118th Congress which took office at the beginning of this month. Among its findings is that the number of Catholic members is down ten members, to 148 from the 158 in the previous 117th Congress, which ended in December.

The report noted that those members of Congress who claim Christianity as their religious preference was at 88 percent, while at the same time in the population at large the percentage of those claiming to be Christian had dropped from 78 percent to 63 percent since 2007. Going back a bit further, the report noted that in the 96th Congress (1979-1980) 91 percent of the members of Congress had self-identified as Christian.

The religious views of twenty members are unknown, since they either failed to respond to the question, or their religious beliefs are otherwise unknown. This includes the new New York Republican Cong. George Santos, who told his hometown newspaper that he was “clearly Catholic” but had campaigned as being “Jew-ish.” We’ll probably hear more about him and his conflicted resume later. As we went to press this week, calls for his resignation had begun.

Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, identified as “unaffiliated” while another, Cong. Jared Huffman of California, described himself as a “humanist.”
Pew reported that “the 469 Christians (out of 534 total members) at the start of the 2023-2024 session comprise — by a smidgen — the lowest number since Pew Research Center began analyzing the religious affiliation of the House and Senate for the 2009-2010 session. During the eight most recent [Congresses], the number of Christians in Congress was above 470, and it exceeded 500 as of 1970.”

While the number of Catholics in Congress declined nearly two percent over the last Congress, the number of Protestants rose by six members to 303, an increase of a little over one percent. It was the first time in four Congresses that the Protestant total topped 300. Of the Protestants, the Baptists and Methodists were the largest singular denominations, with the Baptist numbers remaining the same at 67 members for 12.5 percent of the total. Methodists declined by four and make up 5.8 percent of the total with 31 members.

Of the Protestants, the number that did not specify a particular denomination, but identified as: just Protestant, evangelical Protestant, or just Christian rose from 96 to 107 members.

Other Christian Protestants included in significant numbers were Anglican/Episcopal, 22 members, down from 26 last term; Presbyterian, 25; down one from 26, while Lutheran stayed the same at 22. The report noted that the Anglican and Presbyterian denominations have suffered from a general decline in membership overall. The total of Mormons remained at nine.

Of the non-Christian religions, Jews lost one member from last term to a new total of 33, giving them 6.2 percent of the total membership in Congress. Buddhist, Muslims, and Hindus remained at their previous levels, two members, three, and two, respectively.

One new member from Florida, Cong. Anna Paulina Luna, listed herself as a Messianic Jew. Three members identified as Unitarian Universalists.
Reporting on the differences between the chambers, the report said, “Both the Senate and the House are numerically dominated by Christians, with each chamber having a similar Protestant majority (57 percent in the House, 56 percent in the Senate). Looking at Protestant subgroups, Baptists make up a slightly larger share of the House (13 percent) than the Senate (10 percent). Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Lutherans, and Congregationalists comprise larger shares in the Senate than in the House.
“Catholics account for a slightly greater share of House than Senate members (28 percent and 26 percent, respectively). There are eight Orthodox Christians in the House, but none in the Senate.”

Of the non-Christians, Jews have a more significant presence in the Senate with nine percent of that body while they have only six percent of the House membership. There is a Buddhist in each chamber, and all the Muslims, Hindus, and Unitarian Universalists are in the House.

When viewed by party, the congressional religious make-up is more Christian than the general population. While Christianity is the dominant tradition of both parties, Republicans are — by percentage — more heavily represented than the Democrats, 99 percent (268 out of 271) to 76 percent (201 of 263). However, a greater share of Democrats identify as Catholic, 31 to 25 percent.

Among the total numbers of Democrats, 12 percent are Jewish, of the members whose religious preferences are not known, seven percent are Democrats. All Unitarians, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus are Democrats.
Sixty-nine percent of the Republicans in Congress identify as Protestants. Baptists make up 15 percent of the total; Methodists and Presbyterians, five percent; nondenominational Protestants, 25 percent. All nine Mormons in Congress are Republicans; two members are Jewish.

For the purposes of analysis, the authors of the study included the three Independents in Congress, Senators Kyrsten Sinema, Angus King, and Bernie Sanders as Democrats.

While the percentage of Protestants is declining in the adult population, the “newcomers to Congress are substantially more likely than returning members to identify as Protestant: Nearly two-thirds of freshmen (64 percent) are Protestants, compared with 55 percent of incumbents,” the report said. However, it points out that nearly 30 percent of the incoming members claim an unspecified denomination of Protestantism.

Catholics make up 22 percent of the newcomers to Congress while incumbents make up 29 percent. The report concluded:

“There also are nine members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints [Mormons] and eight Orthodox Christians among the incumbents.

No newcomers identify with either of these groups. Jewish members of Congress make up six percent of all freshmen, identical to the share of Jewish returning members. There are no Buddhists, Muslims, or Hindus among freshmen members of Congress, and the religious affiliations of five congressional newcomers — including Santos — are unknown.”

Interesting breakdown. At least, on paper, there are a lot of God-fearing gents and ladies all primed to do us well. Problem, of course, is that we can only see what is on paper: numbers, breakdowns, and affiliations. You can’t see what is in their hearts, and, as we all know, just because someone calls himself a believer, or even a Christian, doesn’t mean that they are or will even act as if they do.

We can, however, pray that these public affirmations of faith will play out in the real world to our benefit and the glory of God.

If we want to truly petition Congress we might first start by praying that the members will be true to God’s will.

You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every Thursday on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/) 

Parental Rights Under Attack

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue

The bad news is that parental rights are under attack all across the country. The good news is that our side is fighting back. 

It is hard for those who want to sunder parental rights to admit it openly, which is why they typically engage in stealth campaigns. The fact that those involved in this scam are working in the White House, education and healthcare is alarming. Once again, it is the ruling class that is the problem. 

We have prepared a report citing several examples of this furtive agenda. Here’s a few examples. 

  • On April 27, 2022, President Biden told educators, “They’re not somebody else’s children; they’re like yours when they’re in the classroom.”
  • On July 14, 2022, it was reported that Biden’s CDC was encouraging LGBT youth to engage with Q Chat Space. This online chat space, where youth can discuss sex, polyamorous relationships, the occult, sex change operation, and activism, is designed with a “quick escape” feature so it can easily be hidden from parents.
  • On September 29, 2021, the National School Boards Association sent a letter to the Biden administration accusing parents of being domestic terrorists because parents were outraged over attempts to sneak Critical Race Theory and gender ideology into the schools.
  • On September 5, 2022, it was reported that schools across the country were using changes in Title IX by the Biden administration to hide information on children’s “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” from their parents.
  • On September 5, 2022, we learned that Laurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago worked with “Gender Support Coordinators” to facilitate sex and gender transitions for students. This was done under a confidential policy that allowed this to occur behind the backs of parents. The program features radical gender theory, “kink,” and “trans-friendly” sex toys for children. 

Children belong to their parents—they do not belong to the state. Parental consent is not only a right, it is an imperative. Government officials, educators and healthcare workers who disagree, and are actively subverting the rights of parents, need to be outed and dismissed. 

To read the report, click here.

The week with Faith On Trial

Listen now: https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/



 

Saturday, January 14, 2023

Catholicvote publishes ebook on church violence

CatholicVote announced to donors on Thursday its latest eBook, “Burning the Churches: Anti-Catholic Violence and Government Silence.” The free resource exposes the Biden administration’s failure to prosecute the surge in church attacks and offers concrete steps Catholics can take to hold them accountable. The eBook, which readers can download here for free, details the astonishing scope of the attacks – which have risen to levels not seen in over 100 years.  READ 

Supreme Court to Hear Case of Former Postal Carrier Who Lost Job After USPS Refused Religious Accommodation

Washington, D.C.—Today, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to review a Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision finding that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) is not required to provide religious accommodation allowing an employee, Gerald Groff, to observe the Sunday Sabbath.  Groff is represented by First Liberty Institute, Baker Botts LLP, the Church State Council, and the Independence Law Center. 

“It is unlawful for employers to discriminate against employees on the basis of religion,” said Kelly Shackelford, President, CEO, and Chief Counsel for First Liberty. “It’s time for the Supreme Court to reconsider a decades old case that favors corporations and the government over the religious rights of employees.”  

“Observing the Sabbath day is critical to many faiths—a day ordained by God.  No one should be forced to violate the Sabbath to hold a job,” added Randall Wenger of the Independence Law Center. 

Aaron Streett of Baker Botts said, “We are simply asking the Supreme Court to apply the law as written and require employers to grant meaningful religious accommodations to people of faith.” 

Lead trial counsel Alan Reinach of the Church State Council observed: “Workers have suffered too long with the Supreme Court’s interpretation that disrespects the rights of those with sincere faith commitments to a workplace accommodation. It’s long past time for the Supreme Court to protect workers from religious discrimination.”  

Gerald Groff began his career with the USPS in 2012 in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, as a mail carrier. When the post office started delivering packages on Sundays for Amazon, Groff chose to be reassigned to another post office branch that did not participate in Sunday deliveries, even though it came at the cost of his seniority, because it allowed him to follow his religious conscience. When Sunday deliveries began at that post office branch, he then asked for a religious accommodation to observe Sunday Sabbath. The postmaster initially granted his request, allowing him to work additional shifts on other days of the week instead, but later the USPS offered only proposals that would still require Groff to work on Sundays and thereby violate his conscience.  Forced to choose between his faith and his career, Groff resigned and sued the USPS.  The district court sided with the USPS, concluding that accommodating Groff would pose an undue hardship on USPS. The Third Circuit upheld that decision. 

Attorneys for Groff, argue that, as a federal employee with USPS, Groff was protected by Title VII from discrimination based on his religious beliefs and practices.  They suggest the Supreme Court re-examine TWA v. Hardison, the key case that determined the lower courts’ decisions.

Thursday, January 12, 2023

Iowa Governor Leads on Ambitious School Choice Initiative

Under Gov. Kim Reynolds' plan, all Iowa families who opt their child out of the public school system would be able to access the state’s portion of per-pupil spending—about $7,600—through an ESA to use for private school tuition, tutoring, textbooks, curricular materials, special-needs therapy, and more. Heritage Expert: Jason Bedrick

House Passes Bill Protecting Babies Born Alive in Botched Abortions

Nobody should get away with infanticide. Without specific enforcement provisions or clear legal consequences for negligent providers, abortion survivors are left vulnerable to neglect and ultimately death, particularly in abortion sanctuary states and jurisdictions. The status quo is unacceptable. The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would augment current law by requiring that infants born alive after an abortion receive proper medical care and establishes criminal consequences for abortionists who fail to do so. This is not a hypothetical problem. State and federal data confirms that babies can and do survive abortion attempts. Protecting these children isn’t remotely controversial. Heritage Experts: Melanie Israel, and Emma Waters

Diplomacy in Drag

At a time when inflation has forced belt-tightening in households across America, the State Department has seen fit to give a cultural center in Ecuador $20,600 to host “drag theater performances,” with the goal to “promote diversity and inclusion.” Heritage Expert: Simon Hankinson

Monday, January 9, 2023

How Catholic Are Congressional Catholics in the 118th Congress?

By Catholic League president Bill Donohue 

In the 118th Congress, Catholics comprise 28% of the seats, the largest of any religious affiliation. But just how Catholic are these Catholics? 

We reviewed the scorecard of incumbent representatives and senators as tallied by National Right to Life and NARAL, the two most authoritative sources measuring congressional support for the right to life and the right to abortion, respectively, in the nation. For newly elected members, we consulted their stated record on this subject when they were candidates. Here is what we found. 

In the House of Representatives, there are 65 Democrats who claim a Catholic identity, 54 of whom have a perfect pro-abortion record; and all 10 of the newly elected members are in the pro-abortion camp. Of the 56 Republicans who claim a Catholic identity, 48 have a perfect pro-life voting record; one has a mostly pro-life record; and the seven newly elected members espouse a pro-life position. 

This means that 98% of the Catholic House Democrats are pro-abortion and 100% of the Catholic House Republicans are mostly pro-life. 

In the Senate, there are 15 Catholic Democrats, 12 of whom have a perfect pro-abortion record. Of the 11 Catholic Republicans, 7 have a perfect pro-life record. 

This means that 80% of Catholic Senate Democrats are pro-abortion and 100% of Catholic Senate Republicans are pro-life. 

In the last two years, both parties have become more entrenched in their positions. Even people known to be more moderate on this issue ventured closer to their party's extreme. For instance, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine moved more to the pro-life camp. However, moving in the opposite direction was Joe Manchin of West Virginia: he had a perfect pro-life rating in the 116th Congress but dropped down to a 67% score in the last congress. 

Similarly in the House, Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ) became more pro-life after leaving the Democratic party. Henry Cuellar (TX-D), who was widely seen as the last pro-life Democrat in the House, earned a higher score from NARAL and a lower score from National Right to Life. 

Does this mean that Catholic Republicans are better Catholics than Catholic Democrats? On the issue that the bishops regard as the "preeminent" issue of our time, namely, abortion, it certainly does. It must be said, however, that as a true measure of one's Catholic status, one's voting record on one issue is not necessarily dispositive. 

Some argue that a congressman's record on social justice issues is a more accurate gauge of his Catholicity. The problem with that contention is that it is much more difficult to make comparisons on such matters. To wit: Catholics who favor more government welfare programs contend that their position is better aligned with Church teachings, yet Catholics who oppose more government dependency maintain that they are more faithful to the Church's teachings on the poor. Climate change is another issue that is difficult to score. 

Ultimately, whether one is a "good Catholic" depends on factors of a more intimate nature. But it is not wrong to suggest that elected Catholic officials who maintain a decidedly pro-abortion voting record are an embarrassment to Catholics. They most certainly are. After all, the right to life is the most foundational of our natural rights. This is not an observation—it is a fact of life. 

To read our tally of the voting records on the issue of abortion for all Catholics:

For the House, click here.

For the Senate, click here.

Why Biden Doesn’t Care About The Border But You Should

By Deacon Mike Manno

(The Wanderer) – One of the nice things about the Christmas holidays is that this paper skips an edition at the same time my radio station goes to all sacred music through January 1. That gives me a nice respite from column writing and program producing to just relax and contemplate what the Old Year has wrought and what the New Year might unveil.

As I watched the year-end reviews on television I was reminded of a column I wrote back in September of 2020. I looked it up and had an amazing, but not unexpected revelation. And the first thought that crossed my mind was: I warned you!!!

Here is, with some new additions, what I wrote back then:

I started with the old maxim of “divide and conquer” which had been used throughout history to achieve military and political victory over one’s opponents. A variant of that was used in our political system but it was toned down somewhat by an overwhelming sense of national unity.
Unfortunately, I wrote then, that over time we have lost the sense of an overarching unity that transcends all, with each side playing to its own base of niche groups, railing against the other side’s groups in order to gain power.

With that in mind, let’s go back to 1966 when two members of the Democratic Socialists of America, Columbia University sociologists Richard Cloward and his wife, Frances Fox Piven, articulated a strategy which sought to quicken the fall of capitalism by overloading the government with a flood of impossible demands which would push society into crisis and economic collapse.

Much of their theory was based on the work of socialist community organizer Saul Alinsky. Cloward and Piven started with welfare reform. They argued that the welfare system manipulated and weakened the poor who could only advance when “the rest of society is afraid of them.” Yet in their view, the welfare program provided a safety net which calmed anxieties and placated the poor.

Thus Cloward and Piven argued that activists should work to sabotage the welfare system by forcing it to collapse which would spark a poor people’s rebellion to which the government must respond. They suggested endorsing goals, such as a guaranteed living wage and the redistribution of wealth.

Their strategy was outlined at the 1966 Socialists Scholars Conference. The following year the National Welfare Rights Organization was founded which began to use the tactics Cloward and Piven had suggested, in which the poor and minorities were urged to seek all the benefits allowable under law. The idea was to overwhelm the system using such tactics as relaxing welfare requirements, like the elimination of work or job requirements, which would lead to economic collapse.

As I wrote in 2020: Organizers used sit-ins, mass demonstrations, school boycotts, picket lines, and riotous behaviors, to gain legislative and court victories. Despite good economic times, welfare rolls jumped over 200 percent; in New York City alone for every two working persons, there was now one on welfare. Although the guaranteed living wage was not achieved, the tens of billions of dollars in welfare entitlements came close to sinking the economy, just as Cloward and Piven had predicted, and was partly responsible for the bankruptcy of New York City in 1975.

After the attempt to scuttle the economy by trying to overload the welfare system, the pair moved to other areas, one of which was the voting system. They disapproved of the electoral system for the same reason they complained about the welfare system: It placated the marginalized, giving them the idea that their vote gave them a stake in the government which dissipated their anger.

To that end the team concentrated on transforming the Democratic Party. In 1982 they presented their plan in the left-wing publication, Social Policy, which entailed the same roadmap they used to try to overwhelm the welfare system: flood the system with new voters to provoke a political backlash.

As I wrote back then: “The backlash would force officials into using unfamiliar and cumbersome registration procedures, purging non-voters from the rolls, and other voter suppression devices that would create an anti-backlash against the establishment over voting rights. The result led to the transformed Democratic Party, now allied with the poor in their new ‘class struggle.’ Groups like ACORN led on these issues demanding such things as the 1993 Motor-Voter law which made it easier to register to vote but harder to determine the validity of the new registrations.”
The journalist and writer John Fund wrote in his book Stealing Elections: “Examiners were under orders not to ask anyone for identification or proof of citizenship. States had to permit mail-in voter registrations, which allowed anyone to register without any personal contact with a registrar or election officials. Finally, states were limited in pruning ‘deadwood’ — people who had died, moved, or been convicted of crimes – from their rolls.”

Fund reported that Motor-Voter did swamp the voter rolls with millions of invalid registrations filed on behalf of sometimes dead or nonexistent persons, setting the stage for unprecedented levels of voter fraud and voter disenfranchisement claims.

As I wrote then, Fund reported that in 2010 then-Cong. Barney Frank (D., Mass) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) were preparing legislation whereby any person whose name was on any federal list would be automatically registered to vote without any identity verification at polling stations. The intent was to overwhelm the voting rolls to collapse the system as was tried with the welfare system. It was all an outgrowth of their plans to destabilize the election system causing chaos to the benefit of the socialists.

Of course, this necessitated help from friends embedded in the government bureaucracies to “assist” in the administration of the new socialist economic programs which were now being provided by the taxpayers.

Libertarian economist Wayne Allyn Root wrote in 2010: “Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven….They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival…and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.”

He also suggested that if you add healthcare (Obamacare) with statehood for the District of Columbia as well as Puerto Rico, legalization of the approximately 12 million illegal immigrants then in the country, and raising taxes you’ll get the “perfect Marxist scheme.”

That is what I wrote back in 2020, before the disastrous response to the COVID pandemic which forced school, business, and even some church closings and well before the debacle of the “COVID requires rules change” election. And yet what happened immediately after the election was the unofficial opening of the Southern Border and the swamping of our Homeland Security system by a flood of incoming immigrants who were allowed to boarder-jump all the while our border protectors were reduced to administrative duties, baby sitting, and scattering the new arrivals across the nation by the dark of night.

And we still hear of plans to give amnesty (read that citizenship and voting rights) to all those who entered the country illegally, as well as statehood for DC, and we already have authorized 87,000 new IRS agents to suck up any lose change the bumpkins in the cheap seats have left.
Things are progressing nicely for those wishing to overload and override the systems of government. Biden and his cronies know exactly what they are doing: following the Marxist playbook of Cloward and Piven. It’s working nicely for those who wish to — not to coin a phrase — “fundamentally change America.”

And we wonder why our traditional civic values, beliefs, and even religious institutions are under attack. It’s all part of the plan.

Fentanyl anyone?

(You can reach Mike at: DeaconMike@q.com and listen to him every Weekend on Faith On Trial at https://iowacatholicradio.com/faith-on-trial/)